• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

HoI4 Dev Diary - Ship Designer

Hello, and welcome back for another look at what is probably my favourite feature of Man the Guns: the Ship Designer. It has cost us a lot to make - sweat, tears, sanity (several members of the team now understand the “Poi” meme).

The stated goal of Man the Guns is to make the naval gameplay more involved and adding more depth to it by adding more roles that need to be covered and giving the player new tools to fill these roles. We also wanted to make sure that we had a system that could represent a wide variety of ship types with a minimum of clutter. Finally, we wanted the system to be as moddable as possible.

As many of you have concluded from Daniel’s little accident on stream last week, we have overhauled ship types to be ship hulls instead. The ship hulls themselves are basically empty containers with no combat stats. For simplicity’s sake they do contain stats like cruising range and HP (although they don’t have to!), but the rest of the stats come from modules.

(It should be noted that a lot of the numbers and the GUI you are about to see are not completely final so please keep your pitchforks pointing downwards and your torches unlit)

britain_cruiser.jpg


Every hull type has a limited number of slots in which you can fit these modules, and also restricts what type of module you can fit. So a Destroyer - now called a Light Ship Hull - can’t mount heavy guns or airplane launchers but can mount depth charges, whereas a Battleship - now called a Heavy Ship Hull - can mount airplane launchers and heavy guns but not depth charges. These slots come in two flavors - fixed and custom slots. Fixed slots are things that are either mandatory - like the engines - or shouldn’t compete with other things. All ships except submarines have a fixed AA slot, for example. You don’t have to fill that slot if you want your ship to be completely helpless against air attacks, but you can also only ever mount AA guns in that slot. Custom slots are much more flexible and allow you to tailor a ship to a specific role. Higher levels of ship hulls generally have more custom slots available.

ENG base hull destroyer.jpg


Say you play Britain and have somehow ended up in a war against Germany. Submarines are raiding your convoys and you are desperate for new escorts. Under the old system, you built a bunch of destroyers at a fixed cost, maybe spent some naval XP to upgrade their ASW capabilities and that was that. Under the new system, you take an early (read: cheap) light hull and strip out everything you don’t need. That ship is going to operate in the middle of the Atlantic, far away from enemy air, and the opponent has no carriers, so it needs little, if any, AA. The enemy surface fleet hasn’t shown itself in years, so you can skimp on the gun battery and the torpedo armament to cut down cost. You also go with the most basic set of engines to keep the ship as cheap as possible - it doesn’t have to be fast to catch a submarine. Instead, you load the ship down with depth charges and sonar modules to track down enemy submarines. The goal is to make a cheap convoy escort that can be mass-produced.

Britain destroyer Escort.jpg


However, Japan has been making aggressive noises recently and you expect to fight in the Pacific against enemy carrier battlegroups. So you start with a more more modern destroyer hull and add as much AA as it can carry to send it to help out Australia.

Britain Fleet Destroyer.jpg


Unfortunately, you miscalculated and the Japanese are running swarms of cheap, disposable destroyers with lots of torpedoes and not much else, using their carriers in a defensive role to provide air cover. So you design a light cruiser with plenty of guns to annihilate the destroyers before they can do too much damage. It won’t be cheap, but it’ll give you the edge - once it is in service. Somewhere along the line you’ll also want to build up a carrier battlegroup or two of your own, and that means you’ll have to also look at cruisers and battleships for escorts as well as the carriers themselves…thankfully you have a number of old battleships and cruisers lying around that could be given a second lease on life by refitting them (details to come in a future dev diary!)

A lot of these considerations come down to cost. We played around a bit with the idea of having ship hulls provide an amount of tonnage and modules cost some tonnage, but in the end we found that it was easier to understand if the number of variables restraining a design was fairly small. While the system will allow you to build super ships with naval attack values that dwarf the values you can reach in 1.5.4, they will not be cheap and they will have some other areas in which they are weak.

britain_hermes.jpg


The system also allows you to build a number of ship classes that have been requested a lot, without having to add new subtypes. A light carrier is just a carrier with fewer hangar modules (and thus considerably cheaper), an anti-aircraft cruiser is just a regular cruiser that mounts dual-purpose main guns (which perform somewhat poorly against surface targets compared to other armament options). A seaplane carrier is a cruiser that dedicates most of its custom slots to airplane launchers, giving it great surface detection at the cost of being bad at pretty much everything else.

Germany_panzerschiff.jpg


For some ship types we made special hull types that give special capabilities. The Panzerschiff hull is available for Germany and is essentially a cruiser that mounts a single battleship-grade heavy battery module. Sweden and other nordic countries get a special Coastal Defense Ship hull, which is slower than a regular cruiser but can also mount a battleship gun. The German pre-dreadnoughts have also been given their own hull type, but here it is more a case of missing capabilities…Most of these are set at game start, but some are available as special rewards for completing certain focuses.

germany_cruiser_submarine.jpg


As you may have guessed, modules are unlocked by researching technologies. Most of these are in the new and revised naval tech tree which isn’t ready to be shown off just yet, but some are spread around other tech trees. Radar research gives you access, unsurprisingly, to radar modules, and researching anti-air in the artillery tree unlocks better AA guns to mount on your ships. Fire control computers are a side branch of regular mechanical computing machines.

Here is brief list of modules for each ship type, note that some of this will not fully make sense until you see the details of the naval combat rework that is coming in a future dev diary (™):

Light Hulls:

- Light Battery: Provides some naval attack against other light ships, higher models also have dual-purpose capabilities to add AA

- Anti-Air: Provides some air attack

- Depth Charges: Provide sub attack

- Torpedoes: Provide some torpedo attack

- Mine Rails: Provide some mining capability

- Minesweeping Gear: Provides some capability to sweep mines

- Radar: Adds some surface detection. Later models also provide bonuses to naval and air attack

- Sonar: adds some submarine detection

- Fire Control System: adds a bonus to naval attack and anti-air

Cruisers:

  • Light Battery

  • Light Medium Battery: adds some more naval attack and armor piercing, better against light ships

  • Medium Battery: adds some naval attack and armor piercing against other heavy ships. Less effective against light ships.

  • Anti Air

  • Depth Charges

  • Torpedoes

  • Mine Rails

  • Secondary Battery: gives some attack against light ships, particularly useful for heavy cruisers and battleships. Later models have dual-purpose capability to also add AA value

  • Airplane Launcher: adds some surface and submarine detection

  • Armor: adds some armor to reduce incoming damage at the cost of speed

  • Radar

  • Sonar

  • Fire Control System

Heavy Hulls:

  • Heavy Battery: Adds a large amount of naval attack and armor piercing at the cost of speed. Basically useless against light ships.

  • Secondary Battery

  • Anti-Air

  • Armor

  • Airplane Launcher

  • Radar

  • Fire Control

Carriers:

  • Deck Space: Provides more space for planes

  • Deck Armor: provides some armor and HP at the cost of speed. Competes with Deck Space for slots

  • Anti-Air

  • Secondary battery

Submarines:

  • Torpedoes

  • Mines

  • Radar

  • Schnorkel: Reduces visibility of submarine

As you can see, your light hulls will carry a lot of weight to provide defense against submarines, but can also be turned into quite potent AA units or nasty torpedo boats. Cruisers are meant to be very flexible and fulfil a variety of roles, from being essentially super-heavy destroyers with plenty of torpedoes and guns to being the poor-man’s capital ship or being large, fast minelayers. Battleships and Battlecruisers are separated by different armor schemes and not much else, but with heavy armor being both labor and resource intensive, perhaps some corners could be cut…

britain Carrier.jpg


Carriers are now more flexible in terms of size, ranging from tiny carriers for a handful of planes all the way to 100+ plane supercarriers. That should make the entry into the carrier game somewhat achievable even for smaller nations. Submarines are still largely the same, but with some upgrades they can be very hard to find indeed and special submarines can lay as many mines as a dedicated minelaying cruiser for less cost and lower risk of detection.

While the ship designer window itself is going to be part of the DLC, the old naval tree you already know will simply unlock pre-scripted ship designs, and instead of the ship designer window you get the regular variant upgrade screen you are already familiar with.

Britain super battleship.jpg


Assuming that the Ship designer works out as we hope it does, we might expand the system to cover tanks and airplanes as well. Some of the backend was made with tanks and airplanes in mind, but we are mainly concerned with overloading the player with design choices during potentially hectic situations in the war (you are trying to micro the encirclement of 6th Army but you also need to design a new tank destroyer…). Ships have a long lead time so we expect you to have to design them less often.

That is all for the week. Next week we will talk a bit about what you can do with your old ships...and why you probably won’t be able to build min-max battleships on the first day of the game.


Rejected Titles:

Playing with LEGO-Ships

Who designs the designer?

Basically made just to allow Sweden to have its historically accurate fleet

This is a Panzerschiff. It schiffs Panzers.

Aviation Battleships are bad and you should feel bad.

This radar nonsense will never work

What’s wrong with my bloody ships today?

The spirits of Emperor Wilhelm II and Sir John Fisher were consulted for this feature

We ship Iowa/Musashi

RIP the torpedo battleship meta 12/6/2018-7/11/2018

The best ship design is Friendship

Count of people who ask about doing this for tanks and airplanes without reading the dev diary so far: 1
 
Last edited:
So the old Naval Tree with historical ship classes is gone? That kind of stinks...
 
So the old Naval Tree with historical ship classes is gone? That kind of stinks...

If by 'historical ship classes' you mean only historical class names, then yes. In the game now (1.5.4) there's no difference between RN DD4, RM DD4 and Liberian DD4 so I don't know why you complain, the ship designer finally will give more diversity to the ships.
 
Fantastic.

DLC's should always be looking to improve on base game features in ways that are interesting and fun. Being able to design naval units in both historical and ahistorical ways to combat current/future difficulties seen in the water makes for the most comprehensive improvement we've seen yet. Other DLC's have been "nice" but really lacking in interesting decisions (outside of focus trees) that the player had to make.

Echoing others, I look forward to when (not if) this system comes to tank and air units. I would love to be able to properly design tanks to combat both other tanks and infantry. While I still get a kick out of the Sturer Emil being rated so well in armor because it's a "heavy TD", I'd much prefer a hard hitting poorly armored (and cheaper to make) long range tank destroyer for my heavy tank divisions. Throw in the ability for a few Sturmtiger variants for my infantry for city fighting and I'll be a happy camper.
 
If by 'historical ship classes' you mean only historical class names, then yes. In the game now (1.5.4) there's no difference between RN DD4, RM DD4 and Liberian DD4 so I don't know why you complain, the ship designer finally will give more diversity to the ships.

Add to this: HoI IV is'nt meant as a game with historical authenticity. :(
 
@podcat @Archangel85

This is my main question:

Is the AI capable of dealing with this system?
Will it, for example, send specialised ASW ships to the middle of the Atlantic if necessary or will it be hard coded (as the UK) to do so anyway, whatever the circumstances?

In tandem with this question, I must ask, will the AI have some kind of limited ability to analyze my focus tree choices(like I do theirs) and implement a strategy to counter it. For instance, if I go down the surface fleet line in the Germany Tree, will the AI be able to come up with a strategy to counter that?
 
If by 'historical ship classes' you mean only historical class names, then yes. In the game now (1.5.4) there's no difference between RN DD4, RM DD4 and Liberian DD4 so I don't know why you complain, the ship designer finally will give more diversity to the ships.
I guess you have a point. I guess I just always like the historical flavors that came with that. It would be nice to have a default templates based on them. However, if they do this with navy I think they should go the full way and do the same with air and tanks.

However it will feel odd off to build Strategic Bomber 3 instead of B-17 complete with picture of the plane. But I am clearly in the minority here so I'll shut up now.

Playing Germany and constantly updating your tanks while you lose the East would be awfully historicAl however.
 
Holy Guacamole, this looks amazing.

Assuming that the Ship designer works out as we hope it does, we might expand the system to cover tanks and airplanes as well. Some of the backend was made with tanks and airplanes in mind, but we are mainly concerned with overloading the player with design choices during potentially hectic situations in the war (you are trying to micro the encirclement of 6th Army but you also need to design a new tank destroyer…). Ships have a long lead time so we expect you to have to design them less often.
I said some of the backend. The only thing that means is that if we decided to make a tank designer, it would be a bit faster than making the ship designer because we already made some of the stuff we need.
Will it be possible to mod it in with MtG though?

RIP the torpedo battleship meta 12/6/2018-7/11/2018
Does that mean that MtG comes out TODAY? :eek:

Count of people who ask about doing this for tanks and airplanes without reading the dev diary so far: 1
Count me out, I at least read it before asking :D

Missing art for BB heavy armor module.
And here I thought you were just being sneaky again... See what these spy games are doing to us? The paranoia, the neurosis...
 
Expand the system to cover tanks and planes as well!!!!!! please!!!! dooo itttt!!!!!
Hell honestly I'd love to see it for everything, small arms, artillery, motorized / mechanized ect.... Really customize our arm forces.
 
It's looking like the best dlc in ages. However, I found it extremely beneficial of you would use the same system for tanks and airplanes. For those who do not want to invest the micromanagement, there could be premade variants for tankbuster, infantrietanks/heavy fighter, medium bomber and so on.
Another thing I'd like to ask is if the fuel cost of the ships is dependant on the hull size or the tonnage? In the screenshot it looks like if the light carrier would use the same amounts of fuel than the supercarrier, and this does not make any logical sense.
 
This looks amazing. It seems to have everything I wanted. It looks like another day 1 purchase for sure.

Some Petitions:
* Please do not paywall this designer. We will end up in another EU4 Estates situation again. The designer has to be a Core feature. Maybe paywall some hull types (like Cruiser Subs, Carrier Subs or Japanese Torpedo Cruisers). But please not the entire screen.
* Please allow us to mod in namelists without changing the checksum. I want to chase achievements AND have my own ship/division namelists.
 
So does this mean that ships will actually use torpedoes against other ships now? Or are they still going to prefer using their main guns above all else?
 
I guess you have a point. I guess I just always like the historical flavors that came with that. It would be nice to have a default templates based on them. However, if they do this with navy I think they should go the full way and do the same with air and tanks.

However it will feel odd off to build Strategic Bomber 3 instead of B-17 complete with picture of the plane. But I am clearly in the minority here so I'll shut up now.

Playing Germany and constantly updating your tanks while you lose the East would be awfully historicAl however.

I didn't mean to be rude or something. Anyways, you have a point with the bombers, however, I'm pretty sure that there will be preset classes of ships so there's nothing to worry about.

Even if there will be none, the group of people who can't spend 3 seconds to do something because muh micromanagement will make some sort of mod that will bring back the old ship classes.
 
Assuming that the Ship designer works out as we hope it does, we might expand the system to cover tanks and airplanes as well. Some of the backend was made with tanks and airplanes in mind, but we are mainly concerned with overloading the player with design choices during potentially hectic situations in the war (you are trying to micro the encirclement of 6th Army but you also need to design a new tank destroyer…). Ships have a long lead time so we expect you to have to design them less often.
Personally, I think it would be fine. At least with the groups I play with online we usually pause the game for events and such, so the hectic situations you describe wouldn't really be an issue. So, +1 for tank and plane design! I would love that level of detail. :)
 
Count of people who ask about doing this for tanks and airplanes without reading the dev diary so far: 3

I know there was going to be a rework on researching (for instance, no more reduced time and instead, increased speed), but does that also mean that some of the techs will have their time decreased as well?

Right now, I don't even bother, most of the time, in researching new ships unless I get a focus that improves the speed research of a certain category. Because at the moment a strong navy doesn't win you the game (nor prevents you losing), because what matters are boots on the ground and planes in the sky.

And considering how many different modules you can research for the ship (for instance, AA tech will also improve AA for ships, is the same true for Art and AT as well or standard ship gunnery is going to be its own tech?)