• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Victoria 3 - Dev Diary #52 - Player Objectives

16_9 (2).jpg

Hello everyone, and welcome to Victoria 3’s 52nd Dev Diary. My name is Nik or Paradoxical Nikname and I am here to tell you about Player Objectives in the game.

DD52_1.png


Objectives screen
You might have already seen this screen from the last Dev Diary, but I will go through it again quickly. Here we give you the player a choice on what you would like to do in your game. You have the tutorial, three different objectives and the Sandbox. If you missed the last Dev Diary and would like to know more about the Tutorial (click here). Then you have the three Objectives to choose from, we’ll go into those in a bit. Finally, we have a sandbox for those of you who want a completely unguided campaign.

What are Objectives
There are multiple goals we are trying to achieve with objectives. First and foremost we wanted to present the player with some suggested accomplishments to try and achieve before the end of the game. How the player chooses to complete the tasks in the end is up to them.

Another one of our goals is to make an extra challenge for players who have dipped their toes into the tutorial and now want to try and take that knowledge and see if they can carry themselves without the extra help from the tutorial.

Also we see it as a way of giving the player an idea of what to play. Say that you are in that, “I wanna play (insert Paradox Title)” mood, but you don't know what you want to do or who to play as. Now we have a mission for you to complete either as a specific nation or a random one.

One thing I would like to make clear to you is, these are not an extra set of tutorials. These are their own challenges available as an additional option. There are no “How” and “Why” tutorial lessons that guide you towards completing the tasks. It is entirely up to you to solve and complete the task at hand.

Player Agency and Direction
Much like the Journal system walks a tightrope between historical accuracy and the player's ability to create their own alt-history, the Objectives system has to balance agency and direction. Too much direction and you feel railroaded or puppeteered, too little direction and the goal just becomes noise competing for your attention instead of something to strive towards.

In early playtests we found that many players were intrigued by all the systems and how they fit together but didn't know why to perform certain actions in the game, because nobody was pushing them in a particular direction. This was particularly true for strategy players new to Victoria, while those with prior experience could more easily formulate goals for their campaigns before they started: "I want to liberalize Tsarist Russia" or "I want to form Poland as Krakow" or "I want to make Qing the globally dominant economic force".

The Objectives system helps with this in two ways:
  1. By having the player tell the game what kind of game they want to play, the game can suggest suitable countries and provide relevant challenges
  2. By having the player decide on a campaign goal ahead of time, they have at least an initial direction for their first steps

Objective pacing and modding
As mentioned briefly in the Tutorial dev diary, the Objective system includes a pacing mechanism that hands out appropriate Journal Entries to players at the appropriate time. This system is invisible during play, but can be utilized by modders to make their own Objectives - or even more tightly scripted long-term event chains or campaigns, if desired.

Each Objective has a series of subgoals, with trigger conditions that can include previous subgoals and effects that happen when they trigger. This means subgoals can become eligible to fire only when a certain subgoal is marked complete, or for as long as a different subgoal isn't complete, or when any of a named set of subgoals are complete. The typical effect when a subgoal triggers is to grant a Journal Entry, but it can also perform any number of other things - setting up preconditions, firing notifications, changing AI parameters, and so on.

Combined with the capabilities of Journal Entries, this technically lets an enterprising modder make entire branching narratives that can change based on the conditions of the player and the rest of the world when the subgoal was triggered. In practice we're much more open-ended in how we use it for the Objectives that will be in the game at launch, since we only use it to provide some player-selected direction for their campaign.

Recommended starts
Each Objective will have its own recommended nations to play as that can be easier or more difficult to complete the Objective as. It is also entirely up to the player if you wish to play as one of these recommended nations or if you instead wish to select your own nation to play with objectives on. These countries are selected because they are interesting nations to pursue the stated objective with, and may have their own unique quirks to overcome or leverage as they progress through the challenges.

DD52_2.png

Starting a game with an objective enabled
At game start, similar to tutorial, you will get a notification letting you know that you are playing a certain objective. After letting the game tick for a few days you will get your first task, simply complete the task and move on to the next one.

DD52_3.png


DD52_4.png


DD52_5.png

Progressing through the objective
As stated earlier above, Objectives work like a chain of Journal Entries. Unlike the Tutorial however, there aren’t special triggers that are needed for them to fire after completing the previous entry. Most will appear immediately after you complete the previous Journal Entry.

These tasks are meant as a helping hand, you will need to complete them to get to the final Objective, but you will be free to complete the objectives any way you want. One of these objectives can be as simple as making sure that a good in your home market is not too expensive. Another could simply be a requirement to pass a certain law.

DD52_6.png

The Final Objective
After completing the secondary objectives, you will receive your Final Objective. This objective, which is named after the full Objective, will take much more time and effort to complete. The tasks before were meant to help you along the way and prepare you for the final task. Upon completion of the Final Objective, you will receive an associated Achievement.

Economic Dominance Objective

DD52_7.png


For those of you who love pie charts or want to put your economics degree to the test, we have the Economic Dominance Objective. For this Objective we want to present the player with a host of tasks that relate to improving your economic power base, with the overall goal being to control a large part of the Global GDP within your market.

Hegemony Objective
These flags are not all correct (yet)! The technical reason for this is that the game hasn't actually started yet, the dynamic flag system can't kick in and alter the flags appropriately for the start conditions, so it falls back on a default flag. We're looking into it :)

DD52_8.png


For all you map painters out there we have the Hegemony objective. In this objective you will aim to have a large portion of the global population within your, or your Subjects', borders. Subjugations and aggressive expansion may both be part of your strategy, but ensuring your population growth is on par with the rest of the world is also crucial.

Egalitarian Society Objective

DD52_9.png


If you aren't particularly into the big number go up or expansionist game, we have a Nation builder objective for you as well. In Egalitarian Society your task will be to make the most equal society you can. You will need to expand your institutions as well as passing more progressive laws to achieve your goal. Once you have established this equality of (legal) opportunity, the final challenge will be to also develop a very high average Standard of Living and education rate among all your Pops.

Ending
That's all from me today. As many of you know most of Paradox goes on vacation next month so there will be no Dev Diaries in July, but we will be back in August with more!
 
  • 172Like
  • 57Love
  • 13
  • 11
  • 9
  • 3Haha
Reactions:
I'm usually pretty positive to what are presented but this selection felt lackluster. Only "Egalitarian Society" stood out to me. This isn't normally a problem in my experience to set my own objectives but if we get this option then some more flavourful choices further down the line.
 
  • 4
Reactions:
I'm usually pretty positive to what are presented but this selection felt lackluster. Only "Egalitarian Society" stood out to me. This isn't normally a problem in my experience to set my own objectives but if we get this option then some more flavourful choices further down the line.
The given options seem sufficient to me. What sort of additional objectives are you thinking of?
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The given options seem sufficient to me. What sort of additional objectives are you thinking of?
I will start with saying that I think that its a weird thing to offer these objectives from the start, partially because it would seem to me that there's a significent overlap on the concept of achivements. Players can set their own objectives but here's are a few objectives that I would like to see if we're going with this feature at all.

Universal Monarchy - Unite the entire world and rule it as an absolute monarch for 25 years

Brotherhood of Mankind - Ensure that every country on Earth is a monarchy

Terminus Stands - By the end in 1936 all territorial borders are identical to those in the start in 1836

Liberality - Make the world a liberal paradise

The Red Planet - Make every territory on Earth is under socialist rule
 
  • 9
Reactions:
I will start with saying that I think that its a weird thing to offer these objectives from the start, partially because it would seem to me that there's a significent overlap on the concept of achivements. Players can set their own objectives but here's are a few objectives that I would like to see if we're going with this feature at all.

Universal Monarchy - Unite the entire world and rule it as an absolute monarch for 25 years

Brotherhood of Mankind - Ensure that every country on Earth is a monarchy

Terminus Stands - By the end in 1936 all territorial borders are identical to those in the start in 1836

Liberality - Make the world a liberal paradise

The Red Planet - Make every territory on Earth is under socialist rule
None of those seem like things that it should be possible to do.
 
  • 11
Reactions:
I will start with saying that I think that its a weird thing to offer these objectives from the start, partially because it would seem to me that there's a significent overlap on the concept of achivements. Players can set their own objectives but here's are a few objectives that I would like to see if we're going with this feature at all.

Universal Monarchy - Unite the entire world and rule it as an absolute monarch for 25 years

Brotherhood of Mankind - Ensure that every country on Earth is a monarchy

Terminus Stands - By the end in 1936 all territorial borders are identical to those in the start in 1836

Liberality - Make the world a liberal paradise

The Red Planet - Make every territory on Earth is under socialist rule
Those sound like very specific goals suitable for achievements. This system is more of a way to guide a newer player in a certain direction but not to such a specific outcome.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
None of those seem like things that it should be possible to do.

Give gamers six months with the released game and I can promise you that someone will have done it or be able to pull it off.

Those sound like very specific goals suitable for achievements. This system is more of a way to guide a newer player in a certain direction but not to such a specific outcome.

Hence part of why I was mentioning of why I see the overlap between the two concepts. Could be that its to help new players "win" the game but we'll have to see how things will turn out.
 
  • 4
  • 1
Reactions:
Give gamers six months with the released game and I can promise you that someone will have done it or be able to pull it off.

The fact that the game has flaws is not a reason to encourage people to think that those flaws are features. Your suggestions are all various flavors of world conquest, which is contrary to the devs' intentions for the game (even though they recognize it will probably be possible). I don't see why the game should accommodate people who fundamentally misunderstand what the game is about.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
The fact that the game has flaws is not a reason to encourage people to think that those flaws are features. Your suggestions are all various flavors of world conquest, which is contrary to the devs' intentions for the game (even though they recognize it will probably be possible). I don't see why the game should accommodate people who fundamentally misunderstand what the game is about.

I don't recognize much in what you write with what my intentions were. For the record I have never done or accomplished a world conquest game in my entire life in a Paradox game. That includes attempts at it. I'm just not interested in map painting alone to pull it off and invest myself into a project like that.

And for the record there is one, and exactly one, that is a matter of world conquest and that is also about managing to rule the world as a authocrat for a quarter of the game's timeline. Not very easy if Victoria II is something to go by.

But for your sake I will go through my ideas that are distinctly NOT world conquest objectives.

Brotherhood of Mankind - Ensure that every country on Earth is a monarchy

The Red Planet - Make every territory on Earth is under socialist rule


These two are not world conquest but rather interventionist in that you act to ensure that a certain ideology rules the world as opposed to that you yourself rules the world. For example I look forward to at least two different objectives as Russia and France, or Spain, to install, prop up and support Orthodox or Catholic monarchies across the world.

Terminus Stands - By the end in 1936 all territorial borders are identical to those in the start in 1836


Again this is more of interventionist in that you actively do what you can to prevent anyone, including yourself, from expanding to new territories or changing the borders.

Liberality - Make the world a liberal paradise

How this makes for a world conquest is something I really don't understand. More like interventionist, again, but this time in a more Jacobine kind of way as opposed to the previous. Or just use diplomacy to shape the world into a more liberal place.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
For some reason people seem to be thinking these game objectives are also achievements or something.
 
  • 4
Reactions:
For some reason people seem to be thinking these game objectives are also achievements or something.
Possibly because the dev diary directly states that there's an achievement for each game objective.

Brotherhood of Mankind - Ensure that every country on Earth is a monarchy

The Red Planet - Make every territory on Earth is under socialist rule


These two are not world conquest but rather interventionist in that you act to ensure that a certain ideology rules the world as opposed to that you yourself rules the world.
And how do you propose to enforce that without conquering or establishing hegemony over those territories?

If you're deciding what government form a country has over the wishes of its own rulers and people, then you've conquered it, whether you acknowledge that or not.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
I will start with saying that I think that its a weird thing to offer these objectives from the start, partially because it would seem to me that there's a significent overlap on the concept of achivements. Players can set their own objectives but here's are a few objectives that I would like to see if we're going with this feature at all.

Universal Monarchy - Unite the entire world and rule it as an absolute monarch for 25 years

Brotherhood of Mankind - Ensure that every country on Earth is a monarchy

Terminus Stands - By the end in 1936 all territorial borders are identical to those in the start in 1836

Liberality - Make the world a liberal paradise

The Red Planet - Make every territory on Earth is under socialist rule
None of those seem compatible with what they're going for with the player objective system. Those are more proper for achievements than player objectives.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
For some reason people seem to be thinking these game objectives are also achievements or something.
Probably due to the significent overlap between the two concepts.
Possibly because the dev diary directly states that there's an achievement for each game objective.


And how do you propose to enforce that without conquering or establishing hegemony over those territories?

If you're deciding what government form a country has over the wishes of its own rulers and people, then you've conquered it, whether you acknowledge that or not.
With diplomacy for example? Unless I recall wrong we're supposed to be able to get the same stuff with both war and diplomacy. In my mind world conquest, as was refered to in previous points, to me is map painting and annexations. This isn't map painting but interventionist in that you don't paint the map with your country.
None of those seem compatible with what they're going for with the player objective system. Those are more proper for achievements than player objectives.
Probably due to the significent overlap between the two concepts.
 
These objectives are just guides, right? They don't provide any benefits (besides the ones aimed for), correct?
Completing the objectives that are in the game on release will confer no benefits other than earning the related Achievement. Similarly, the sub-objectives along the way confer no benefits other than the ability to progress towards completing the final objective. There's nothing in the system that prevents it though, it could also be used to build a kind of "RPG questline" campaign where the player gets rewards for every challenge they complete or even an invisible HOI-style Focus Tree system where rewards are provided at each node. We haven't used it like that because we wanted the player to pursue the Objectives challenges for guidance, not for extrinsic rewards.
 
  • 9
  • 2Love
  • 2
Reactions:
Is it possible to invert this, as an additional option? That is, would it be possible to select a country, and then the game could show me what could be interesting challenges for that country?
Good idea, but unfortunately no. Of course we could invert the flow and have you pick from the Objectives' Recommended Countries first and then see which they're associated with, but at least at launch that would only be a list of a dozen or so countries each with a single Objective. Clicking through the objectives is just as easy at that point. Perhaps it would make sense to add this kind of selection flow in the future as more Objectives and Recommended Countries are added, though!
 
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
I really like this system. Helps you focus on your goals for your campaign and can still do sandbox if you want.

You mentioned that countries in the game are recommended for interesting reasons, whether there are extra challenges or opportunities for that. However, I would love to know what those are in a blurb besides just what it normally states when choosing a nation. Some nations I get, but others I would love to know why so I can see exactly what will be exciting about playing that country for the objective.
Good point! We intend to update the descriptions accordingly for each country/objective pair, the text in these screenshots is a more generic sitrep blurb at the moment.
 
  • 4
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
Will new objectives be written and updated on a regular basis or does Paradox consider this to be the three that the game needs and that's it?

I remember at the tail end of CK2 the team released an "interesting character" every few weeks and it was totally optional but it was a nice touch that this kind of could fit into. A bit of "this month's idea is do X". Like you say, sometimes you aren't sure what you want to do, but with only three ideas those will eventually run out.
Hard to say at this point how frequently we will update or add more objectives post-release, but we definitely intended it to be infinitely expandable with e.g. expansions. Whether we'll ever turn it into more of a "monthly challenge" type thing I can't comment on now but the possibility exists!
 
  • 3
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
Some of the recommended country picks seem rather weird though. Wouldn't Qing and Russia better fit as potential hegemons than as your first pick for egalitarian society? Similarly, Spain, Egypt and Japan do not seem like the most obvious picks for hegemons, even if they might be well positioned for easy pickings.
Weird, perhaps - but certainly interesting, which is our measuring stick. Qing and Russia are easier and more obvious candidates for Hegemony than Egalitarianism, but that also means players will likely gravitate towards that combination anyway without suggestions. Turning those countries Egalitarian however is a greater challenge and more likely to provide a unique and dynamic playthrough. Taking an isolationist country with a lot of early-game domestic concerns like Japan and turning them outward into a hegemonic superpower is similarly the kind of thing that can really shake a game up. Keep in mind you can always play any objective with any country if you like!
 
  • 4
  • 2
  • 1Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
I wonder how hard it would be to create multiplayer objectives as a more direct alternative to PvP.
Objectives are sadly not supported in multiplayer, at least not at launch. This is less about a technical restriction than a matter of the choices you make when you start a game though, so we may enable this in the future if the idea becomes popular / a requested feature.
 
  • 5
  • 2
Reactions: