• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
This explains everything, it does.

It does explain why I am awesome, yes. And cooler than those mere mortals with Androids :p
 
You don't have to explain yourself to me. I pretty much managed to prove I am a wolf (or at least someone important) using my own method. :eek:o
I'm neither BTW.

My votes/comments round the deadline I think ended up there because I get off work around that time and I usually check in just before loging off. See now what you did, I explained myself to you. Can we call it quits? ;)
I had to explain myself so i will have an alibi in the future. :p

And sure, that is a good idea.
 
Sanguine Thistle said:
Goodie or those. It is a good lynches. But l' amends, leaves it hook. To treat it like evacuees. Let hold it to play while the doctor and the mackerels went. I' ; Mr. to leave the city two days. We will see which state is the village in when I return.

Zombie.png

The thistle of the zombi turns over only d' a small voyage to the city to turn over and find so that the village postulates unnamable with its body made. That is to say or goodie, Syber have probably those be lynches a good which why the thistle of the zombi which is for him is voted before it was the thistle of the zombi. Now, the village of geschroeft is. The thistle of the zombi was a stomme drives out. With died mackerels, the improbable baddies, n' import which reason had was to be wasted a special hunting on him, and after the rout of mackerels lynches, no goodie a hunting on him does not have will have wasted one of both. The thistle of the zombi is with being been relieved free for the EC. The thistle of the zombi can turn over now to its small piece and the more intelligent conversation with the worms to find.

The thistle of the zombi n' do not test d' to hope for reason for n' import which result of this play. The thistle of the zombi cannot suppose qu' it was killed by those, well qu' it was does not suspect the thistle of the zombi. For this reason is to be lost probable better for the zoetigheden, but c' is something which will probably arrive d' a manner or d' another. The thistle of the zombi suspects that this play this last strong seems on, and probably on same the manner, washouts him interesting l' the eleventh treason of hour will finish. The thistle of the zombi cries for you them.
 
Vote Jensthemens, because I'm fairly certain he's only gotten one vote the entire game.
 
Vote Emperor Walter

Motivation :
Some of the best players (marty, jonti) were hunted during the first days.
Normally veterans wouldn't do that, so I guess some newbies are dominating the packs. And Emperor Walter is a (relative) newbie, isn't it ?

I just don't see this at all. marty99 and jonti-h were hunted on back to back nights. For this theory to work that would mean that either there are two packs of newbies or only one pack consisting entirely of newbies. Neither of these scenarios is really believable to me and pushing the vote onto a newer player seems wolfish to me.

Good to hear. :) Unless you are lying through your teeth then we have one no-kill accounted for. Unfortunately that propbably means the other no-kill was not a blessed.

I guess I don't really see any reason why he would lie about it. If he did and the person that actually got hunted last night came forward to expose the lie he would look pretty wolfish. And saying that you were blessed when you were actually cursed doesn't make sense because it draws some suspicion on you when you could just say nothing. I guess he could be gambling on trying to clear himself though.

Quite, we should have gotten someone evil by now even by pure luck and/or the baddies should have eaten one of their own. The packs must have starten out really small, there is just one pack or the baddies are having quite a bit of luck.

Since the seer died very early and probably didn't had time to get an apprentice I would imaging the wolves would become bolder and might even be the ones trying to steer the votes. That fits for AVN and his (in my opinion) illogical case against Emperor Walter yesterday so I'm going to repeat my vote.

vote AVN

Isn't there almost always multiple packs in big? With the low number of players the packs probably just started small like 2 players each.
I too think AVN's case against Emperor Walter was kind of odd.

vote AVN!

I went back and reread the first couple of posts after each update to see if anyone else tried to steer the votes early like I accused AVN of doing and there are a few people who have done it:

Day 2 saw walrus going for Syber_Sis and EURO for walrus.
Day 3 saw WD going for walrus, AVN for Walter and dublish for Kriszo.
Day 4 saw me going for AVN and Lemeard for Jensthemens (less motivated so maybe that is not so much steering the vote)

Hm, no real pattern there. :( I was hoping to catch someone do it more than once. The only thing that keeps repeating is walrus being accused. That's a pattern of sorts but what does it mean? Lets find out!

unvote AVN, vote EUROO7

EUROO7 is always getting picked on. Quit making him cry so much it's annoying. Besides you should believe in yourself, I think you were right about AVN.
 
Vote Walrus

Sorry Walrus. Its not that I hate you, I just find your voting and behavior after syber suspicious. Not a lot, but right now its enough to make me vote you. Especially since the village has been quite quiet and there really isn't a lot of stuff on people.
 
walrus is being less active than normal i feel. I can't do bold on my phone :( Vote walrus.

I can vouch for him. He was having his Texy-as raped by the Mexicans.

Belgium saved him though :D
 
Hmmmm.. This has got *I HATE YOU* written all over it...:p


I hate you all!

For no particular reason except I'm dead and can't play so /bored :p
 
Vote AVN

He has had little attention as of yet.

On the packs: I'm starting to think we might only have 1 pack on our hands; a big pack though. The hunter that shot TT might've been a baddie (since hunter is a trait), perhaps they were even already going for parity. If they had a lot of luck, they might've started with 3 wolves and 2 cultists, got contacted by the sorc, and either the sorc has an apprentice or the wolves hit a cursed player on night 2. That would be 7 baddies around out of 15 players atm (would've been 14 if last night's hunt were successful). It's just a scenario though, if there were 2 packs I think the majority of the village is already a baddie..
 
I suppose a number of people didn't read the rules.
The apprentice is not described as one of the possible roles -> There are no apprentices in this game, unless the GM made a major mistake of course.
 
Last edited:
No apprentices? :confused:

I'm so used to them being there. As of when have they gone out of fashion?
 
I think we need to avoid any chance of a tie today. If the theory of 1 pack is right, then ties are a 50/50 chance of win or lose.

It is odd that when the hunt kill is announced, there is no Pack mentioned who killed that night like most do. Thats either the way the GM runs it or there is no point as there is only 1 pack.
I will have to look over the game and check the vote count before i commit a vote today. Im worried we are close to being over run, especially with the no-kill night!! Hopefully we may still have a 2/3 days to turn this round if there is any luck left out there.
If the no-kill is GA caused, then we may have a chance. There must be a Priest knocking around if theres a sorc. If theres no sorc, then thats another bonus towards keeping plarity off for a few days. Unfortunatley, its all 'What If'..:(
 
It is odd that when the hunt kill is announced, there is no Pack mentioned who killed that night like most do.

Most GM's do that? Haven't noticed.
 
Most GM's do that? Haven't noticed.
No they don't. Most GMs tells us which pack a dead wolf is from but there has been no dead wolves here yet and IIRC Ciry is one of the GMs that don't even give us pack affiliation for dead wolves. Apart from that what Steed says makes sense though.
 
No they don't. Most GMs tells us which pack a dead wolf is from but there has been no dead wolves here yet and IIRC Ciry is one of the GMs that don't even give us pack affiliation for dead wolves. Apart from that what Steed says makes sense though.

That I agree on.

To top it all off there's the plotter and silencer traits. We'll have to be real careful to avoid a tie..