Where does it say that? I wrote that definition of Liar and I'm pretty sure I didn't intend it to say that.
Heh, you're right, it's just those trait groups that are listed. My reading skills are really deteriorating. Whoops. :blush:
Where does it say that? I wrote that definition of Liar and I'm pretty sure I didn't intend it to say that.
I got confused because EURO told cultist pack affiliation in the update when a cultist died and I never do when I have these cultist rules - so I figured he had attached cultists in his rules (even when I knew he had copied my rules and marked out the difference - yeah, not my proudest WW moment, this game...).There came one weird moment when johho publicly didn't know his own rules, and marty asked yet again if we were hunting and had me explain what a back-up hunt was..
Disappointed I didn't win, but damn this was a fun game. Thanks for hosting and congratulations on an excellent game EURO.![]()
Well, he also thought I was a wolf days before I actually became one, so I wouldn't put too much stock keep in his gut![]()
Unfortunately, I might not get away with openly getting the Priest lynched in a Big again. I hunted Skobie the Seer and got the first Priest tamius lynched in one night/day cycle.![]()
Heh, facepalm * 2 for me. Yeah, since your pack had two members in the guild I don't think the GA protection for me would have passed the vote...![]()
Speaking of which, Randy's contacting Skobie saying he had sorc-scanned him as the seer, then claiming distiller powers in the thread, then distilling Skobie that night...in hindsight that was a bizarre move.Lucky Skobie didn't notice it because that would've been a pretty obvious sign of evil.
Oh really? I could've sworn he said he had. If you're right, then that was a bizarre coincidence. Randy did claim distiller powers, or if not, he posted in the thread something which would be the textbook way of doing it - he was offering people a bottle of 80% grain alcohol or something.
RP. And like linked above, Liar can't distill.
Interesting about Randy. Why all the RP about distilling then?
Where does it say that? I wrote that definition of Liar and I'm pretty sure I didn't intend it to say that.
I had a plan that you would unvote to Esemesas, I would have unvoted to you (I could have unvoted MC and made the tie even bigger, but it would be a bit too obvious on me) .BTW marty, what *would* have happened if I had logged on in time and snipe-claimed cloak of invisibility? Quite a bit of havoc, I gather?
That is a weird coincidence. Because I honestly viewed - through my insider lens - every RP post you made as setting up to sneak in a claim somewhere. You also seemed to use the exact same format for that claim as you did for every other one. It seemed...I mean' I still can't believe that was coincidental. :rofl: :rofl:
You would also have claimed brutal the next day, I was hoping.
You can only claim one a day though, or so the rules imply.Brutal one-eye-open van helsing, actually. With a standing order to claim either brutal or van helsing depending on whether the village decided to lynch me or not.
Have fun trying to shoot me, suckers. I will take someone with me no matter what you do if you try.
That would have bought me another day, I reckon, since the only sensible thing for the village to do in that situation is to *not* lynch me, but lynch somebody else and come back the day after (after the one eye open expired).
I really get why not many baddies choose that trait. It's an extremely high risk trait to have. But damn it has a lot of power.
He would obviously just state all three clear for everyone to see, and then tell Euro of the one which would make sense. i.e. not lynched - claim OEO, lynched - brutal.You can only claim one a day though, or so the rules imply.
Oh I know that, but the way Randy was saying it, he actually would have had all three. There was no way to be certain of taking someone with him. Only bluffs and double-bluffs.He would obviously just state all three clear for everyone to see, and then tell Euro of the one which would make sense. i.e. not lynched - claim OEO, lynched - brutal.
I don't think it has caused that much havoc when I've had it in games earlier. Mostly it was just used to save someone from lynch, much like a leader that can save himself one day.But I had been planning some havoc with our cloaks for a few days prior to this. Not sure if anyone realised the sheer destructive power it could have.
And a good job you did with it too.Most of it was just me trying to create a proper cover where I could basically pull any kind of rabbit out of my hat and still look clean where claims are concerned. It was really a lot of fun.
Also, for the record: I did *not* expect to survive this game. In a pickpoint game the odds of too many dead villagers showing up with 9 or 9+ points are just too high, and keeping that trait a secret for long if you're actively using it are very very low. Even if I did manage to kill the priest the reveal of said dead priest would give the village too big a clue towards where my real allegiance lied.
My plan was to show off the PL trait, make clear how that thing can be a really big boon to whatever side picks it, and also show how it actually improves the game experience a lot if it's played properly.
So as far as I'm concerned this game is a success.
OEO doesn't protect you against hunters/assassins though.Brutal one-eye-open van helsing, actually. With a standing order to claim either brutal or van helsing depending on whether the village decided to lynch me or not.
Have fun trying to shoot me, suckers. I will take someone with me no matter what you do if you try.
That would have bought me another day, I reckon, since the only sensible thing for the village to do in that situation is to *not* lynch me, but lynch somebody else and come back the day after (after the one eye open expired).
I really get why not many baddies choose that trait. It's an extremely high risk trait to have. But damn it has a lot of power.
You can only claim one a day though, or so the rules imply.
The reason why not many baddies chose it is because not many had the pickpoints. In fact almost every baddie that had the pickpoints to do so DID choose it.![]()
Oh I know that, but the way Randy was saying it, he actually would have had all three. There was no way to be certain of taking someone with him. Only bluffs and double-bluffs.
IIRC I put Liar as somewhat cheaper pickpoint wise for baddies than for goodies since it should be much harder for a baddie to get away with lying. Did EURO do that too?
OEO doesn't protect you against hunters/assassins though.
I would definitely have chosen it if I had the points.I was really surprised to see Aedan choose that. I expected to see absolutely nobody else on team evil choosing it, just because using this is such a fickle thing and so liable to get you lynched for it.
Because as a cultist you have better prospects of victory. You can switch sides, you get better traits and in lynchings wolves are a priority.I don't get why baddies don't choose wolf more often. The fact that priest is cheaper than seer, and that sorc/priest powers are cheaper than seerish, makes it much more likely that there are fewer goodies who can scan you if you decide to spend the points on wolf.