275) FIXED IN 1.03: Knights Templar bug? no sieging? Am I overlooking something.

[Dearmad]

Knights Templar bug? no sieging? Am I overlooking something.

I had a few Knights templar units sent to me and used them, but whenever they're in a combined unit that unit will not siege any enemy castles. Once I detach them and sent them off then the siege begins.

 

[unmerged(27919)]

I used knights from all three orders in my struggle for holy land but didn't noticed that problem,but sometimes army doesn't start siege (no matter if it include order troops) , moving it from county and returnig helps

 

[Dearmad]

Yep. It's now floating around that this is a bug with mercenary troops at times.

 

[Cat Lord]

Is it still happening in 1.02 ?

Mercenarie troops not sieging ?

Cat

 

[Sikker]

Is it still happening in 1.02 ?

Mercenarie troops not sieging ?

Cat

Yes. The problem is that sometimes (always?) anonymous commanders won't siege. They need a leader with a face .... (and all bought troops hasn't got a commander)

 

[unmerged(2036)]

Yes. The problem is that sometimes (always?) anonymous commanders won't siege. They need a leader with a face .... (and all bought troops hasn't got a commander)

my exact impression.

 

[unmerged(28192)]

They do start a siege, sometimes. It just takes them a LONG time, before they think of what they should do.

 

[Bismarck]

Ok, well, what about this case. My vassal was in a war with another country(christian), and I sent 3 regiments of templars to help them siege a province until it was close to falling so they could win the war faster... however as soon as they arrive, the siege stops dead... and I give them the command to pull out and the siege starts over.... so I stop their movement and the siege stops again.

I would agree this need to be looked at.

M

 

[Cat Lord]

FIXED IN 1.03

Cat