I'm sorry if this is posted in the wrong place but at least I reported it.
If you move an army of lets say something as small as 2 in the beginning of the month, no men will be lost. If you move them towards the end of the month, you'll lose some.
For example, I move an army of 2 from Anglia to Kent on June 1st, no men will be lost. If I move an army of 2 from Anglia to Kent on June 25th and the month crosses over to July, then I will lose some men.
Sorry if it's kind of confusing and if its even a bug at all. I just think it's wierd, I think that you should be able to move men whenever you want and not lose any if they walk for less than a month. To make it simpler, let men walk for 1 month (or more, whatever) so you don't lose any. Don't make it matter if the months cross over. Does anybody agree? Does it make sense?
If you move an army of lets say something as small as 2 in the beginning of the month, no men will be lost. If you move them towards the end of the month, you'll lose some.
For example, I move an army of 2 from Anglia to Kent on June 1st, no men will be lost. If I move an army of 2 from Anglia to Kent on June 25th and the month crosses over to July, then I will lose some men.
Sorry if it's kind of confusing and if its even a bug at all. I just think it's wierd, I think that you should be able to move men whenever you want and not lose any if they walk for less than a month. To make it simpler, let men walk for 1 month (or more, whatever) so you don't lose any. Don't make it matter if the months cross over. Does anybody agree? Does it make sense?
