1.) We need a tag treasury and a treasurer to manage it. This is necessary so there is not a clash of IDs by two different people. They should be handed out carefully and efficiently. Perhaps in units of 10 ID's for events (or something like that). Nation tags are much more limited, and therefore should be handed out more sparingly. Leaders and ministers and unit types also need to be managed carefully.
2.) This is a personal opinion, but I think we really should not limit other mods to use the events and ideas formed in this project. The only limitation that we should impose is that the original author(s) should be credited. This is if we want to live up to the first two words which make up C.O.R.E.
3.) A config tool (which has been done with the IGC and later AGC) would be really a great thing to have, as it allows controversial things to be optional and configurable for the player.
4.) I assume we are started in 1936 with this project? In any case this (and other information) needs to be properly included in a F.A.Q. of some sorts. Later on when we have the project well established, we may want to consider other start points.
5.) Perhaps a project philosophy of some sorts? Some guidelines which explain the criteria for acceptable events. Such as event must be free of grammatical errors, have logical and realistic choices, and so on.
6.) I find it slightly annoying that there is no period after the last letter of CORE in our forum title. I hope some moderator will read this and fix this minor problem.
2.) This is a personal opinion, but I think we really should not limit other mods to use the events and ideas formed in this project. The only limitation that we should impose is that the original author(s) should be credited. This is if we want to live up to the first two words which make up C.O.R.E.
3.) A config tool (which has been done with the IGC and later AGC) would be really a great thing to have, as it allows controversial things to be optional and configurable for the player.
4.) I assume we are started in 1936 with this project? In any case this (and other information) needs to be properly included in a F.A.Q. of some sorts. Later on when we have the project well established, we may want to consider other start points.
5.) Perhaps a project philosophy of some sorts? Some guidelines which explain the criteria for acceptable events. Such as event must be free of grammatical errors, have logical and realistic choices, and so on.
6.) I find it slightly annoying that there is no period after the last letter of CORE in our forum title. I hope some moderator will read this and fix this minor problem.
