Hey Crook, why don't you mail me those files? It would spare me a lot of unnecessary work...
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
Crook,
I would hate to see Granada go, but I am not immune to good arguments... So convince me.
As for the files I need, that would be the monarch and leader files for Persia and the Uzbeks, plus the historical monarch events file. I reserve the right to leave some of the leaders out though.
I would hate to see Granada go, but I am not immune to good arguments... So convince me.
As for the files I need, that would be the monarch and leader files for Persia and the Uzbeks, plus the historical monarch events file. I reserve the right to leave some of the leaders out though.
Jehangir,
As I see it, the whole point with Granada is its existence as a revolter; not its short initial existence in 1492. As such, it is as valid and relevant as most other revolters.
What I want to know is how important the Qazaks were in the grand scheme of things.
As I see it, the whole point with Granada is its existence as a revolter; not its short initial existence in 1492. As such, it is as valid and relevant as most other revolters.
What I want to know is how important the Qazaks were in the grand scheme of things.
Ok, I have heard enough to convince me that Granada can be safely dropped. However, I am not entirely sure the tag should be used for the Kazaks. I must say that in my games, Russia still does tend to conquer Sibir eventually, so I have few worries about hindering the Bear more, but every reassignment of a tag should be carefully considered.
TRI is a moslem tag, so it should be used for a nation with moslem or exotic type units. The Kazaks are one clear alternative, but there are also some SE Asian states that might be added... So, Kazaks or Siam, Korea or what?
If we combine Catalunya and Aragon, that leaves us with another catholic (or orthodox if it exists from the start) nation. One logical use would be to assign the free tag to New Spain and reinstitute Sardinia again.
After that, all we have left is FPR, which I assume is protestant when it revolts, or converts when possible. It should be used for a nation in Europe; possibly Mecklenburg.
As for the Iriquois, it is true that they are always inactive, but there is not much else that the tag may be used for...
TRI is a moslem tag, so it should be used for a nation with moslem or exotic type units. The Kazaks are one clear alternative, but there are also some SE Asian states that might be added... So, Kazaks or Siam, Korea or what?
If we combine Catalunya and Aragon, that leaves us with another catholic (or orthodox if it exists from the start) nation. One logical use would be to assign the free tag to New Spain and reinstitute Sardinia again.
After that, all we have left is FPR, which I assume is protestant when it revolts, or converts when possible. It should be used for a nation in Europe; possibly Mecklenburg.
As for the Iriquois, it is true that they are always inactive, but there is not much else that the tag may be used for...
Yes, Siam is Auytthaya or course; I was thinking of Cambodia.
Hmm, now that I think about it, Cambodia is probably not such a good choice - it was a messed up country in this time frame. How about something in Burma? I believe there was some pretty powerful nation in the area... Taunga or some such. Even had the edge on the Siamese if I remember correctly.
Hmm, now that I think about it, Cambodia is probably not such a good choice - it was a messed up country in this time frame. How about something in Burma? I believe there was some pretty powerful nation in the area... Taunga or some such. Even had the edge on the Siamese if I remember correctly.
Last edited: