-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Well I would endear the notion of becoming a sacrificial lamb. But that sort of masochism just doesn't do it for me. Then again once could just go to Essos...
Well, then if you were in Westeros, you would just die then. If not to the Others, then to the Aztecs. It's as simple as that. Those who can survive the Long Night and adapt to the Aztec's culture will thrieve.
I mean, it's not like Westeros was already a paradise wonderland to start with. If the Westerosi culture is supplemented by the Aztec culture after the Light Night and the Aztecs held onto Westeros for a couple generations, rather than conquerors, they will be seen as liberators who saved the land from the White Walkers and enlighten the "barabarians" to their culture.
That is how I see it if my proposed scenario happened (White Walkers conquer Westeros, Aztecs invade with dragons).
I do not know what you are arguing about, but I'm gonna say you have a very intense dislike the Aztec/Greek cultures and very strong association to the European nations which Westeros based off of.
- 2
So what is your stake in this? Would you mind terribly explaining why you disagree with whatever point I'm trying to make? You seem to be arguing for the sake of arguing.
- 1
This thread seems to have been made purely for that. At least seeing what you two have done of it
- 3
It didn't start out that way, I was just pitching ideas. Then, he started trolling.This thread seems to have been made purely for that. At least seeing what you two have done of it
- 1
Did abolitionist societies such as Braavos or Pentos not cross your mind?
Eh, explain? It's seven AM and I haven't had a drop of caffeine.He wasn't the only one
Our first posts in regard to our little discourse revolved around why the arrival of the Aztec's would or wouldn't be considered a 'liberation'. I offered facts and information as to how continuing life as a survivor of the Long Night would be futile under the Mesoamerican yoke, whilst you simply offered your 'opinions'. After our third posts respectively I basically went 'f*ck it' and we basically switched roles. I think that's what TheArrogantOne is trying to say, though I might be wrong.
I just thought that this discussion was so pointless that you both have to be trolls. No offense.
1: Aztecs are just silly to have in this mod.
2: WWs should not get free troops. That's gamey and stupid. They should get troops appropriate to the amount of casualties they've inflicted on the north to represent necromancy.
2: WWs should not get free troops. That's gamey and stupid. They should get troops appropriate to the amount of casualties they've inflicted on the north to represent necromancy.
1. Agreed, though Aztecs are "just silly" in vanilla equally. Let's not start a debate about this. If you want Aztecs, use the DLC. If you do not, don't.
2. I had the same thought, actually, but I doubt it's possible to mod. I support the idea wholeheartedly... but first, it has to be possible, and I'm not sure if it is.
But it was what OP asked, Aztecs vs WWs. It's in the title.
If you came into this thread and thought a discussion about Aztecs vs WW is pointless, why on Earth did you click in the first place?
But it wasn't the topic...
The main theme, if I recall correctly, was "Do the Aztecs get an advantage vs White Walkers, if not, could they?" and you made it an argument, themed "Would you prefer to be killed by the Others or rather by the Aztecs?"
Seriously.
- 1