• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Fulfilling the National Oath


The spoils of the old Ottoman Empire hadn’t been thoroughly divided, and years after peace was signed between the Allies and Turkey the Iraqi-Turkish border was finally being settled. One could wonder if Britain could have settled the issue earlier, when Turkey was facing unrest, in its favour but in the second half of the 1920s, Turkey was more united than ever. As a matter of fact, the Mosul question had gained much attention in the country, where the nationalist frenzy that had begun with the independence war hadn’t settled down. This made the Turkish leaders prone to assert their positions in the region, and to demand a revision of the temporary border, located on the Brussels line.

Mustafa Kemal and his underlings however knew that the demographic situation in the province wasn’t in their favour as it was home to Assyrian Christians who hated the Turks and to Sunni Arabs. The Turkmens were expected to back the Republic, as they were kin to the Turks, but the Kurds were a wild card. Experts who had come to the region earlier had considered it dominated by Turks, but in a few years a distinct Kurdish nationality had begun to form. The Sheik Said uprising, as well as the Turkification policies that denied them any particularism, meant that the factor that made them feel Turkish, the Caliphate, was gone. It was widely expected that the attitude of the Kurds would be the key to Mosul for one side or the other.

What all agreed upon was the dislike of Britain. The Mandate itself was opposed by most Arabs, who wanted independence or union with the rest of Shams; the Kurds had been morally supported by the Allies during the early stages of their rebellions, before the larger Sheik Said uprising, but afterwards had been abandoned and never received the weapons they had hoped for; the Assyrians were supportive of the British but remained a small minority. The Kurds themselves were divided between the ones who wanted an independent Kingdom of Kurdistan and the ones who remained loyal to Turkey and felt Turkish albeit with a different language. The British administration didn’t truly campaign for Iraq, and the Arabs began to publicly oppose the colonizers, who were giving away their homeland to the old Turkish oppressors. The Syrians tried to intervene and to persuade the Iraqi government to offer autonomy to the local minorities to gain their votes, but the Iraqi government had very limited power and couldn’t make such promises. In the meantime, Turkish soldiers arrived in the region, and restored a well damaged public order.

Hnawmjh.jpg

Turkish soldiers near Mosul.​

The British Army also moved in to maintain order, but their presence wasn’t as impressive as the Turkish one, as for the first time since the Battle of Megiddo the Turks were setting foot in the region, and if they didn’t openly come as conquerors many locals felt as if the old Ottomans were coming back. Comparing the situation of Ottoman Mosul, close economically to Anatolia, and the perpetual unrest Iraq was facing, coupled to the news of wonderful economic performance in Turkey, made some leaders rethink their positions. The Arab nationalists were horrified at the idea of a return of the Turks and soon the Turkish patrols were thrown rocks upon, and regularly faced attacks. In early April, order had been restored in the province, although tensions between communities ran high. The pro-Turkish campaign orchestrated by the Society with large funds given by the local Turkish consulate was everywhere, and the Iraqi nationalists could only count on private funds.

The organization of the elections was disputed by all parties, as the Turks claimed they would only accept the result concerning the small region the Ottoman Parliament had called a region of Turkey in 1920, while the British intended to let the majoritarily Arab Western regions vote. At the end of the day, the referendum was carried in the entire region, as outlined by the British protocol. Only the wealthy elite, made of conservative Muslims, would get to vote as the mass of Arabs was disfranchised. After all, the tax system in the region was disrupted and only urban elites and rural chiefs were able to cast their votes.

When the result came in, Turkey won by a small margin, a mere 47 votes. 9704 persons voted to remain a part of Iraq, while 9751 intended to go back under the wing of the Turks. However, in the regions outside the scope of the National Oath boundaries, 3228 men voted for Iraq while a mere 403 went to favour the Turks. The Kurdish vote had been determinant and widely in favour of Turkey, as they received promises of cultural autonomy within the Republic, promises the Arabs couldn’t make them. All over Turkey, people demonstrated to show their support for their government that had once again defeated the perfidious Allies, and united a new part of Turkey with the motherland. In Britain, the news was received more cautiously, and ties with Turkey were seen as paramount, for the Navy needed the Mosul oil fields for its operations in the Indian Ocean.

In the Western regions of the Mosul Vilayet, riots broke out. The Turkish and British forces were forced to withdraw, facing attacks by the tribes, reinforced by volunteers from Syria. In Baghdad it took three days to the British army to stop the riots and for three whole days, Baghdad was aflame. In the rest of the country an uprising launched by Mehdi al-Khalissi was gaining momentum although the british troops managed to keep control over vital infrastructure and cities, maintaining their hold on the country.

Abdullah ibn Hussein never had the influence of his brother Faisal and had been appointed King of Iraq merely to please its Arab population. But Abdullah wasn’t the as open-minded as Faisal and saw the inclusion of Mosul as tantamount for Iraq, to bring religious balance in a Shia country. He had no real power, as the British administrators ran the country, but in name he was a monarch, the head of state of Iraq. Following the advice of fellow Hashemites such as ‘Abd al-Ilah and nationalists - Muhammad Hasan Abi al-Mahasin was close to the puppet ruler - he thus made the most important move of his career by abdicating in favour of Faisal. Arabs, he claimed, needed unity and a rump Iraq wouldn’t be able to survive on its own. Facing the heinous resurgent Turks and treachery and disrespect from Britain, he had no other choice than to dissolve his country.

Zzfur6a.jpg

Abdullah and ‘Abd al-Ilah, shortly before the abdication.​

At the same time, the nationalist Kurds began to spread their propaganda among the general Kurdish population, that was less supportive of Turkey than the elites, and underground organizations were created to arm and train volunteers before the day of the liberation of all Kurdistan could come. The Khoybun was the main party behind this movement and from Beirut it led the fight for Kurdish freedom. Turkey had to openly welcome the Kurdish regions of Iraq into the republic but at the same time the Kurdish threat was growing and factions in the Parliament opposed all exceptions to Turkification.

The legality of the events in Iraq was dubious and as May Day was celebrated all around the world, Paris, London and Ankara would have to find a fitting solution, to solve the Mosul Question once and for all.
 
Progress Agreement of British Borneo

In light of recent progress of Sarawak and its heightening to the status of a model colony his Majesty's government has decided to fund and encourage this trend of the developing nation situated in North Borneo.

  1. The United Kingdoms shall transfer $200 000 000 to the Kingdom of Sarawak.
  2. The Kingdom of Sarawak pledges to invest $200 000 000 pounds into repaying their debts.
  3. The Kingdom of Sarawak pledges to invest majority of its budget into financial growth for the next coming 5 years.

[] Signed by British representation
[X] Signed by Sarawak representation


Signed by His Higness, Charles Vyner de Windt Brooke, Rajah of Sarawak
nQaETAi.png
 
Last edited:
TREATY OF TELAFER

Recognising the referendum that was held in the Mosul region, in between the dates of April 20th and 22nd, which had shown that a majority of the voters have casted their vote in favour of the Republic of Turkey.


THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND;

THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY;

And the KINGDOM OF IRAQ




Have agreed to elevate democracy and respect the outcome of the aforementioned referendum, and have agreed as follows;


Article I: The High Contracting Powers agree that the Mosul Region’s southern border shall be set at the Telafer line, marked in the annex.


Article II: The Kingdom of Iraq shall refrain from drop all claims on the land, resources, and all other property of the Turkish Republic north of the Telafer line


Article III: The inhabitants, whether settled or semi-nomadic, who enjoy the rights of pasturage or who own property on the other side of the Telafer line shall continue to exercise their rights as in the past. They shall be able, for this purpose, freely and without payment of of any duty of customs or of pasturage or any other tax, to transport from one side to the other of the line their cattle with their young, their implements, their tools, their seeds, and their agricultural produce, it being well understood that they are liable for the payment of the imposts and taxes due to the country where they are domiciled.


Article IV: The Transfer of sovereignty shall begin as the treaty is signed, with the Turkish administration and security forces assuming their duties until October 29th, when the region shall be formally transferred to the Turkish Republic. The British and former Iraqi troops shall withdraw south of the Telafer line.


V. Recognising the security situation in Iraq proper, the Republic of Turkey shall allow the United Kingdom to retain their military bases in the Mosul region pending final agreement.


VI. The Republic of Turkey declares that it shall not, unless directly and openly threatened, interfere with the situation in Iraq.


VII. The Republic of Turkey, the Kingdom of Iraq and the United Kingdom of Great Britain declare that they dedicate themselves to the friendly ties between their nations and shall remain actively seized on the matter of preserving and advancing them.


[X] Gazi M. Kemal, President of Turkey

[ ] George Clark, British Ambassador Plenipotentiary to the Republic of Turkey

[ ] Iraqi representative
 
200px-Imperial_Coat_of_Arms_of_Iran.svg.png

It is a crass thing that most Iranians exist only in the limit of the people within their immediate vicinity, who know their name and even then only know them by their personal name and the name of their father or mother. For a modern nation, this will not do. I declare that all must all choose a surname and register with it, to help in the organisation of Iran and to show ourselves a modern people. Family and heritage is important, and it shall remain important, but the new Iran must not be an Iran of different kinships but an Iran of Iranians. Every step in the direction of modern nationhood is vital.
 
wcLqFlC.jpg



Address by President Mustafa Kemal to the Turkish National Assembly.


Honorable deputies, elected representatives of the noble and esteemed Turkish nation. I have returned to you from a long journey to Telafer, which is now -like Mosul and Kirkuk- a Turkish city. Here I have met with the British Ambassador to our country and an Iraqi delegation to finalise the terms of the sovereignty transfer. We have negotiated a plain and simple deal, my friends, that shall see our Mosul at least reunited with the Motherland on the day of her ressurection, October 29th. That day, I shall rejoice. Not only for one of the final steps in uniting the Anavatan but that the final wound between our country and Great Britain, a country that I consider a great friend of the Turkish nation, is finally healed.

My friends, the mixed population of Mosul is shown by the shallow electoral victory, of merely 47 votes. Mosul has a long and proud history of religious tolerance, and it is something we should not break. We can not afford to break it. Yes, our Turkish and Kurdish brothers make up the majority of the population, but they are not all Sunni Muslims like most of the country. There are, of course, the Shia. But there are too the Christians, like the Assyrians and Armenians. There are the Jews. There are the Mandaeans. They are of varied ethnicities and creeds indeed, and many of them are not Turkish. But they have democratically become Türkiyeli, and we should welcome them as we would welcome our long-lost cousins. We should not force them to immediately switch their language, we should not force them away from their religion. We should not abuse them in their own homes. Gentlemen, this is what happened to our people not even a decade ago! It would be an unspeakable dishonour onto our nation's flag if we had forgotten already! I have here a paper, which has the text of our National Pact on it. I shall cite the Fifth Article to you.

The right of minorities as defined in the treaties concluded between the Entente Powers and their enemies and certain of their associates shall be confirmed and assured by us - in realiance on the belief that the Muslim minorities in neighbouring countries also will have the benefit of the same right.

The people of Mosul have entrusted us all with the safety, security, and future of not only themselves, but of their communites and family, as well as their future generations. And it would be a loathsome act to betray their trust. I believe that it is paramount for the internal stability of the Turkish Republic is the will of all Turkishes - Turk, Kurd, Armenian, or Assyrian - is the will of us all to live together under one banner. The red banner with the star and crescent that when we see it, we feel proud of our country and our being a part of it. I appeal to you legislators to ensure that the religious and ethnic rights of non-Turkish groups throughout the country will be respected. The moral character and civlisation of a nation are to be measured by how its weakest members are treated; as a civilised nation, it is not unreasonable that we tend to all people within our borders.

It is a shame that there are those countries who do not believe this. While many examples can be listed throughout history, there is one that is on the mind of every mind right now: Romania. The heavens above Transylvania will forever be stained by these ungodly crimes, that go against everything a human being stands for, that were committed by its Hungarian population. It shows the Romanian army is capable of acting on its own, outside government oversight, and do as it wishes against its country's minorities. The Hungarian people have suffered, and the Transylvanian state hopefully guarantees their wellbeing, and that of the Germans. But what of the Turks?

According to our estimates, the Turkish population of Dobruja alone numbers some 140,000. Furthermore, anywhere between 17,000 and 20,000 Tatars reside there, and some 90,000 Gagauz refugees fleeing the Red Army. This is a nation whose actions have gotten it blockaded by the Royal Navy twice in the last seven years and does not respect the minorities living within it. If the lunatic ultranationalists in Romania could do this to their fellow Christians, what feeling must they harbour to the Turks who ruled them before, who adhere to a different fate? Gentlemen, I do not want to await and see it for myself, I want to prevent this from happening in the first place. I plea to you to pass a motion offering immediate and unconditional nationality for all the Turks, Tatars, and Gagauz who wish it.

Gentlemen! The time for peacefully building our country has finally come. The increase of tax rates was a most necessary evil, but we must not be content with our stagnating economy in this era of prosperity! We must attract more foreign capital and skill, show that it is worthwhile to work with Turkey and that the Turkish economy is a safe investment! But we must not only shout that we are, and come with numbers. We must prove to the world that we are a country that builds, not begs. What we need is more and better railroads throughout our country, that link the ports and the hinterland.

We must make sure that the fields of our country, which are severely underdeveloped, produce enough for our peasants to produce more than basic foodstuffs, but also fruits, vegetables, and cash crops to export in larger quantities. We must build a railroad from Adana to Tehran, to aid a fellow nation that is breaking free from the shackles of poverty and ignorance in her development. We must develop our industry, so our light industry may grow and our heavy industry be born. We are a land of bountiful natural resources, what prevents us from producing our steel and concrete to build our own railroads? It is ignorance.

In the coming years, we shall work to reform the Turkish language. I was born in Thessaloniki, Greece. In Macedonia then, and in Istanbul and Ankara now, I speak a Turkish language that makes me nearly unintelligible in Kahramanmaraş and Telafar. Furthermore, our language is contaminated with the Persian and Arabic languages. Our language is in need of reform, like our state was. It needs to be centralised, modernised, and quite frankly purified. This new modern language needs a new modern alphabet, of course. I have ordered prominent linguists to develop this new language, and an appropriate alphabet based on the Latin alphabet.

Furthermore, the educational system of our country is quite frankly, sub-par. We have freed it from the tyrrany of the sheikhs, but it must be modernised thoroughly! All Turkish children must receive class in a modern classroom, where an educated teacher must teach a western and scientific curriculum to the children, the society of the future. Turkey without a skill base will remain forever dependent on agriculture, and our industry shall never become significant if we have no skilled labourers. Men and women, adults and children, must be educated. And the first step of education is being able to read and write; literacy, which shall from the implementation of the new curriculum be at the top of the agenda of the Ministry of National Education.

There is much work to do, gentlemen. But I am proud to be the president of a country which is so eager to work, to learn, and to improve itself. I pray for the well-being of all Türkiyeli, from Edirne to Kerkük. May this great country, like the phoenix, be reborn from the ashes and rise to heights it has never seen before!








(Türkiyeli literally means 'People who live in Turkey'. As you probably guessed, it denotes all who live in Turkey, whether they are ethnically Turks or not.)
 
Last edited:
292px-Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_%28HM_Government%29.svg.png

Progress Agreement of British Borneo

[X] Signed by British representation

With Sarawak continously increasing debt, it has become clear that it is needed for us to step in and help them overcome this issue, and as such we are happy to sign this treaty.


TREATY OF TELAFER

[X] George Clark, British Ambassador Plenipotentiary to the Republic of Turkey

As the people has selected their vote, as well as the final negotiations finished. We hereby happily sign this and hope for a better future with the Turkish republic. We will also station more troops in Iraq to ensure the stability in the region.
 
Bribing President


Cao Kun had won two large political and military victories against his enemies. he first engineered a coalition to see Duan Qirui’s downfall. But the subsequent arrangement didn’t suit him and his relations with Wu Peifu, his consensual strategist, soured as he was raising troops to crush the remnants of the Anfu Club. After his victories against the Fengtian-Anhui coalition, he had a free hand in Beijing and could easily push Wu Peifu aside and get elected President.

Cao Kun thus had everything he had been yearning for and had no reason to disrupt the status quo. As a matter of fact, he had no interest in political affairs and let the technocratic members of the government work, only intervening when he felt his interests were at stake or that he could effortlessly expand his power. Cao Kun saw himself as a modern emperor and now that the North-South rift was mostly healed, he refused to let agitators pertubate the order he had fought to create in the provinces. He thus gave orders to arrest prominent members of the Rural Reconstruction Movement and made a mistake he would come to deeply regret.

The Western interests were fairly well represented among his faction, and they wanted a pro-Western environment to allow investment, but they also wanted the missionaries and christians to be protected. Feng Yuxiang for instance was a leader Western diplomats considered promising; for he was a zealot, easily corrupted and didn’t appear to threaten the established interests of the nations that benefited from the unequal treaties. Among the Zhili, many began to doubt the actions of the leader who was criticized in secret by various representatives of business interests. Wu Peifu was slowly turning into a symbol of unrewarded loyalty, and of what could happen to any follower of the President.

NQTGWZO.jpg

The head of the military academy had been abandoned by the man he had always supported​

In Manchuria, Zhang Zuolin hadn’t disarmed. For three years he had trained his troops, supplied by the Kwanting army and taxing the booming industries of the region under his control. Zhang Zuolin entered a pact, called the Constitution Salvation Army, with most Anhui leaders, and with Feng Yuxiang who was swayed by the promises of riches and more power. Officially, there was a filiation with anti-Yuan Shikai coalition but power-hunger was the main motivation behind it, the anger of the Zhili members at Cao Kun’s recklessness aside. The only thing Zhang Zuloin needed was a casus belli.

Claiming that cooperation with the Russians regarding the railways under their legal authority was difficult as the Soviets had infiltrated their ranks, and thus made these revenues unpredictable, he refused to give Beijing any taxes for the year, saying local authority would be able to use them more wisely. In all but name this was a declaration of independence. If Cao Kun allowed this to happen, he was destroyed politically. He thus officially striped Zhang of his rank and convocated him in the capital. Zhang Zuolin thus came, with his full army and then his allies, Feng Yuxiang the first, openly joined him to oust Cao Kun from power.

With nearly half the armies of China converging on Beijing, Cao Kun was getting restless. He made openings to the dissenters, offering them power in Manchuria, and tried to bide time, hoping he could count on the South to preserve his power. But Tang Jiyao who was tempted to assist him - the drug crime lord and the kleptocrat felt close - faced opposition too as his soldiers refused to die for their Vice-President and instead made Long Yun their new leader. Chen Jiongming was a reformist, and much like Yan Xishan, was interested by his province before anything else and morally supported the revolting warlords. The President being able to dismiss a warlord was a bad precedent to set, and Cao Kun had been shaming the Presidency and wouldn't be helped by the modernize of Guangdong.

Within the Zhili, Sun Chuanfang was the only one who didn’t openly fight Cao Kun, mainly because his close friend Wu Peifu was used as a hostage but he refused to send any troops to Beijing either. Cao Kun was thus all alone, and his troops started knowing it. Division commanders tried to contact the rebels and to switch sides, some were caught but most would be able to ensure their continued power in the wake of Cao’s fall. The battle for Heibei was eventless. The demoralized troops of Cao Kun, 9 divisions, fought for a week before routing and the President was forced to meet Feng and Zhang in his office. They made him sign his resignation in Huang Fu’s favour.

gWMlls5.jpg

Cao Kun in the Portuguese colonyl​

The effective distribution of power remained to be determined however. With elections incoming, all sides wanted to ensure they would get what they saw as their due. Huang Fu was meant to serve for two years to finish Cao Kun’s - who had fled toMacao - term, but real authority would be divided between the winners. The deal was uncertain, independent leaders such as Yan and Chen wanted to have a say in governmental affairs but in an unexpected turn of events, it was decided to leave partially to popular sovereignty. Yuxiang and Zuolin guaranteed each other they would get to control key ministries in the new government but how this would exactly take place - who would get the War Ministry or the Vice-Presidency for instance - would be modeled after the elections. The draft was that the technocratic government would be weakened to allow representatives of the various warlords to serve as ministers and to defend their interests, with Yuxiang and Zuolin taking the lion’s share. Zuolin also wanted to expand his territory but how that would take place was still being negotiated.

One real consequence; that would impact the elections was the destruction of the Zhili Clique as a political force. Wu Peifu still enjoyed respect and credit but for the most part Cao Kun’s followers, even those who had fought him, were at the mercy of the winners who wouldn’t hesitate to replace them. Even if they remained in place, the organized block they represented was gone, and maybe the local elite would then vote for reformist parties such as the growing Young China Party supported by Zuolin instead of simply supporting whoever was in power in the province.
 
640px-Flag_of_France.svg.png

French politics in the 1920's:

Regarding the far-left
From 1920 the French far-left was represented solely by the French Section of the Communist International (SFIC), which was active between the years of 1920 and 1927 and formed it's own parliamentary group. Formed out of the Tours Congress, where a surge in hard-line pacifist socialism almost destroyed the French Section of the Workers International (SFIO), the SFIC was the premier socialist party from it's foundation till the 1925 parliamentary election.

With the wind taken from their sails by conservative-led social reform and their focus on extra-parliamentary action, the SFIC entered into the 1925 election struggling to gain ground, yet ironically it was interference from Moscow that ultimately doomed their French supporters in the election. The SFIC was born from the strongly anti-war mood prevalent in post-war France, but whilst the rank-and-file maintained calls for anti-war strikes the leadership clamoured for punitive action against Germany; the mixed message and evident infighting within the party caused voters to abandon them at the polling stations. Political violence against the right-wing Republican Federation was merely the icing on the cake of the communist debacle, and public support for the SFIC plummeted.

In the few years since the election the SFIC struggled to remain relevant: tensions in Romania and Hejaz took centre stage , issues which the SFIC failed to take a clear stance on. When Soviet troops marched towards the Prut river, the SFIC declared the action legal under international law; while technically correct, their voice was alone and French opinion was unmoved by such technicalities. The downward spiral finally ended when Stalin's internal purges became internationally known, causing the SFIC to voluntarily dissolve itself, with nearly all members joining the SFIO.

Regarding the left
Prior to the Tours Congress, the SFIO was the dominant socialist part in France, with the Republican-Socialist Party (PRS) and other minor socialist parties forming the right wing of the socialist movement. However, overwhelming anger at the prolonged war in Turkey caused the vast majority of the SFIO to break-away and form the SFIC, leaving Leon Blum leading a pitiful rump which was forced to sit with the PRS if it was to have any say at all.

In the run up to the 1925 election, commentators varied on whether they thought the SFIO would rise again or disappear entirely. On the one hand the strongly anti-war credentials of the SFIO and it's more moderate stance put it in good stead to regain votes from the SFIC, but on the other the party had achieved nothing of note in five years and their membership was at an historic low. In the end, the SFIO managed a stellar success, coming third nationally in the vote, far beyond most expectations.

The collapse of the SFIC in late 1926 caused the re-unification of the SFIO, allowing the party to cement it's position as the leading faction on the political left.

Regarding the centre-left
In 1920 the French centre-left was represented by PRS and the Republican, Radical and Radical-Socialist Party (PRRRS), both of which sat together the French parliament.

The collapse of the SFIO in 1920 breathed fresh air into the lungs of the PRS, a party originally founded by socialists who refused to join the SFIO. In the run-up to the 1925 election several minor socialist groupings formally merged with the PRS, and the combined party of moderate socialists hoped to fill the void left by the fragmentation of the SFIO. Ultimately, Leon Blum's strong campaigning and old voter loyalty left the PRS fighting to make gains. Following the election, the PRS has continued to struggle to find an identity between the less moderate socialists and the radicals, and since the election the party has sat SFIO rather than with the PRRRS. In turn, the PRRRS became isolated from their traditional partners.

For the PRRS, the 1925 election was a fork in the road. Recently allied to the reformist socialists, the fragmentation and growing extremism of the left-wing cause many in the party to look towards a "Republican concentration" of conservative republican parties. Their pro-German policy hurt them badly following the German attempt at usurping the Austrian state, and the weakened party made motions to support the governing conservatives. Shortly after the collapse of the SFIC in the polls and the success of the SFIO, the left wing of the party obtained the withdrawal of Radicals from the cabinet and the return to a policy of alliance with the socialists (while still sitting independently), a move which threatened to collapse the nascent government. However, a section of the party's right wing defected and formed the Independent Radicals (IR), a group who sit as the Independents of the Left and continue to support the conservative government.

Regarding the centre-right
In the aftermath of the Great War, the Social and Republican Democratic Party (PRDS) formed the main centre-right political party, supported by a scattering of independent representatives and centrist radicals. After the 1919 election, the PRDS organized and led the National Bloc alongside the Republican Federation (FR) and Republican Independents (a loose grouping of reactionary independents), founded on patriotism and anti-bolshevism.

The PRDS has hoped that their strong position within the Bloc would allow them to form a Republican "third-way", distinct from the left and right, favouring neither reaction nor revolution. As an overture to the Radicals, and to weaken the socialists, Poincare oversaw the passing of moderate social reform, much to the disdain of the FR. As a result, the FR had to be won over with a strong colonial and militaristic policy. Despite his toxic public image following the Franco-Turkish war, Poincare managed to narrowly hold on to the Presidency, specifically by allowing fears of the rising SFIC to convince the parliamentary conservatives that governmental collapse could lead to national revolution. Such fears held together the fragile coalition, and the government limped on towards the 1925 election.

It was hoped that compromise with Germany over the reparations would make détente between Briand (effective head of the PRRS and advocate of compromise with Germany) and Poincare more likely, yet Germany's aggressive attitude regarding Austria and diplomatic brinkmanship forced Poincare away from this policy and further into the arms of his political allies. Ultimately the dream of a centrist, Republican movement would die in 1925; despite their control of key government posts, the PRDS had failed to outline a clear policy that could unite the centre. Further, repeated political mistakes caused the party to slowly concede leadership of the government to the FR. The splintering of the PRRS only served to cement this political reality. Subsequent to the 1925 election the party has rebranded as the Democratic Alliance (AD).

Regarding the right
The French right has been dominated by the FR since 1920, with various reactionary independents forming a fringe faction.

As part of the National Bloc, both the FR and the independents were part of government in the lead up to the 1925 election. While disgusted by overtures to the Germans, the conservatives were too fearful of the communists to risk collapsing government. In this way, Poincare was allowed to strengthen the position of the President of the Republic at the expense of the legislature, a development that the FR were happy to allow.

During the 1925 election the FR took a clear stand against Germany, expressing a willingness to maintain the restrictions on Germany by force if necessary. Generally considered a politically unwise move given the anti-war sentiment of the nation, the conservative rhetoric struck a chord with the French people, granting them a strong plurality of the French vote. From their new position of strength, the FR were able to dictate the terms of the new government, greatly helped by Poincare's strengthening of the executive office. Observers predict that the governing coalition of right-wing interests will seek to further cement their constitutional vision upon the French state, reorganising the home front before seriously contending with external affairs.
 
Chapter XIII: Cao Kun Presidency and Elections of 1927

It is not a good start to a Constitutional government when the first Constitutionally-elected President is deposed three years into his five-year term. If anyone was under the impression that China’s 1924 Constitution would immediately transform the country into a Western-style Democracy with rule of law, such misconceptions are dispelled with the 1927 coup against Cao Kun.

Now, Cao Kun is not, by any means, a model President. He is elected in 1924 largely because he and his ally Feng Yuxiang defeat the Anhui-Fengtian coalition and he is the one with the most battle-ready troops under his command in China after the war. In the three years since his election Cao does little to inspire any confidence - he neglects Presidential duties and intervenes in government only when he sees a chance to enrich himself or one of his allies. Though his party is friendly to Western business interests he demands bribes and kickbacks and is inconsistent in his policies towards business and the West, that is when he has any policies at all.

Meanwhile, with the national government either complacent or incompetent, private groups begin to address China’s social problems, coalescing into what is known as the Rural Reconstruction Movement. The movement has both Western and provincial support, but it threatens Cao’s power by exposing government incompetence and empowering non-governmental organizations. In 1926 Cao attempts to end it by arresting the most visible member of the movement, Jimmy Yen.

Yen is saved by the Shanxi warlord Yan Xishan in the first sign of trouble for Cao. Yan is a powerful warlord who has survived many government changes since the Revolution. His defiance of Cao leads to other such instances and Cao quickly finds himself surrounded by enemies. In warlord China no warlord, no matter how powerful, can rely only on himself. By 1927 Zhang Zuolin in Manchuria, Yan Xishan in Shanxi, Li Zongren in Guangxi, and, most damning of all, Feng Yuxiang, the War Minister, all conspire to remove Cao.

Zhang Zuolin has his own bone to pick with Cao Kun. Supported by the Japanese Zhang dislikes the pro-Western attitude of the government, but even more so he detests the position of President being abused. Yan Xishan and other regional players support the Rural Reconstruction Movement and dislike Beijing corruption. Li Zongren and a handful of younger officers have plans of their own for reforms and cannot wait to sweep aside the leftovers of the Qing general corps. And Feng Yuxiang, as usual, is swayed by money and his own desire for power.

The war itself is uneventful enough to be referred to as a “coup,” though fighting goes on for a week. Cao Kun escapes to Macau after he is forced to resign the Presidency in favor of Huang Fu. This is entirely unconstitutional, as the Presidency should go to the Vice President Tang Jiyao, but Tang is ousted by his own soldiers for supporting Cao and dies shortly thereafter. The perpetrators of the coup form an extraconstitutional “Supreme Military Council” and this body holds real power in Beijing while Huang Fu nominally holds the Presidency.

Despite these flagrant violations of the Constitution the generals allow the scheduled 1927 elections go to ahead. The National Assembly of 550 representatives is to be elected after the previous one served out its three-year term. Though the beginning of the election is pushed back due to fighting in most places across the country it takes place over the scheduled time period.

The Progressive Party, China’s dominant political force, is in disarray. It is an amalgamation of Qing-era reformers and Qing-era generals and Cao Kun was its nominal leader. Although nominally against warlordism and promoting the rule of law it is, in fact, the party most closely tied to warlords and most against drastic reform. With most Qing-era reformers dead or retired and most Qing-era generals dead or forced out of power the party is held together by its support for Cao Kun. Without Cao it is likely to splinter in the near future as it combined many different groups with different interests, but in 1927 it is likely to win the elections, though it is unclear what exactly it would do afterwards.

The Young China Party is in the ascendance across the country. Its right-wing nationalist ideas are popular with the younger generation of officers, students, and intellectuals. Zhang Zuolin’s son, Zhang Xueliang is a major supporter as are many of the perpetrators of the coup such as Li Zongren and others connected to the Beijing Military Academy. The party has tried to woo Wu Peifu, but the respected general has remained aloof. Still, across China there is a desire for strong leadership and major national reforms and the YCP promises both.

The China Public Interest Party is reeling from the ousting of its highest-profile leader Tang Jiyao. Its Western-style liberalism has not been successful in attracting support so far, though its advocation of federalism has won it the support of some warlords. Though Tang supported Cao Kun during the coup the party’s other members like Chen Jiongming did not. It remains to be seen if this party can transform into a national liberal party representing the interests of business and middle class or if it will remain a regional Guangdong outfit under Chen.

The left wing of China’s political spectrum has not recovered since the collapse of the KMT. A handful of KMT leaders such as Wang Jingwei remain abroad, in Moscow or San Francisco, and continue to ostensibly “lead” the KMT. Membership in the party itself in China has dwindled to a few hundred. Hu Hanmin, Chiang Kai-shek and many others have either left the party to become independent or have joined other nationalist outfits such as the YCP. Some left-wing nationalists and socialists have organized the Chinese Peasants’ and Workers’ Democratic Party, but whether it can fill the void left by the KMT remains to be seen.

The 1927 election is strange in that it takes place so soon after the leader of the largest political party is ousted in a coup. What will happen if the Progressives win the largest share of the vote as they are likely to do? Huang Fu is a member of the party, though he is clearly just a puppet of the Supreme Military Council. The militarists among the Progressives may be ok with this arrangement, but the reformers are unlikely to be. Yet at the same time the reformers are likely relieved by the ousting of Cao Kun since this opens the door to changes in the country. It is a strange election happening at a strange time, but the fact that it is happening at all is a testament to the resiliency of China’s nascent democratic culture.
 
557px-Emblem_of_the_Moldavian_SSR.svg.png

Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic​
Comrades! Long did we toil under the oppressive boot of the Tsars, squeezing the very breath out of our people. When the Revolution happened in Russia, we thought we could secure our safety by joining the Kingdom of Romania, who promised to guarantee our rights and freedoms. Sadly, the lies of Romanians have been proven by their actions in Transylvania general and their most recent actions against our people and the Transylvanians. We must fight against the cruel regime of the Romanians who seek to preform pogroms similar to those of the Tsars! The Red Guard of the USSR has enabled us to fight for independence from the cruel yoke of the Romanian madmen. We must fight together to free our nation, our people, and the worker from any attempt of the Romanians to impose their rule upon us.

Long Live the Revolution!

~ Yevstafiy Voronovich, Chairman of the Central Executive Committee of the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic
 
Last edited:


Diplomatic Statements from the Kingdom of Hungary:​

To the Polish Republic and the Participants of the Baltic pact:

We congratulate the Polish Republic and the Baltic states involved in the pact on their diplomatic achievement, however in light of the recent Soviet agression into Bessarabia, we think that such a pact should be expanded, and should the members of the pact consent, Hungary would like to join this agreement on mututal defense.

Regarding the Situation of Romania & Transylvania:

With the Transylvanian Question agreed upon with the Romanian Government, the Hungarian Kingdom once more reiterates its goal to reduce its armed forces back to such a level as agreeable with its neighbours, notes however that this reduction in size of the armed force will happen once the Transylvanian nation is organized and hopefully, once the Soviet Threat is no more. This delay is in no way aimed at any of our nieghbour states, and we hope that, despite historical problems they will come to understand this decision.

The nation is a pocess of daily consent to the government, as iterated by Ernest Renan, and just as the people of Transylvania have given their consent to create the Transylvanian state in their borders, be they of Romanian, Hungarian or German ancestry, so have the people of Bessarabia, ever since its time of annexation by the Romanian state given their consent to live in it - as such it is our firm belief that by the will of its people, this territory should be Romanian. As such, let the Transylvanians be Transylvanian - for they wish it. But let also the Bessarabians be parts of the Romanian state, for such is their wish. They do not want to be Russian, much less do they want to fall under the gruesome spectre of Bolshevism, confiscating their homes and their property.

With the help of God for Homeland and Freedom:
Matyas III, King of Hungary
 
Last edited:
600px-Flag_of_Romania.svg.png


Regatul României
Kingdom of Romania

"Nihil Sine Deo"

Trăiască Regele

With Regards to the Hungarian troops in Hungary and the Transylvanian State:

The government of Romania welcomes the Hungarians willingness to co-operate, and we hope that we can attempt to heal the bonds that have been so badly damage over many years. The Kingdom of Romania announces that it shall respect the Dresden Declaration and thus withdraw troops from the specified "Dresden Zone"; which was agreed when the declaration was first agreed upon. Those who wish to remain citizens of Romania when this new nation is formed, will be able keep their citizenship, and those within Romania, if they so desire it, can emigrate to this new Transylvanian state. The areas outside the "Dresden Zone" will still remain De jure Romanian, and any people who are forming illegal militias in these areas will be arrested for breaking-the-peace.

With Regards to Bessarabia and the Aggressive actions from the Soviet Union:

As long as the illegal occupation of the territory of Bessarabia continues, the Kingdom of Romania will not cede the land to the barbaric and dictatorial Soviet Union. They call our nation one of a "cruel regime" yet they run a one-party autocracy, political opponents are murdered in their sleep; or worse carted of to Siberia, and those who once supported them now detest them, as evidenced by Leon Trotsky's escape from the nation. What kind of nation drives away one of its principle founders? one that has sucumb to Tranny and Totaliterianism, the aggressiveness of the Soviet union against the Soviet union is well know, as nations such as Poland have suffered under its worth, as illegal wars annexing independent nations are declared as like clockwork, however Romania says No! The Government Says No! The State says No! and most importantly, the People say No! We are standing up to the Pariah that is the Soviet Union, and we not surrender to the tyranny that has befallen it. With this, we are applying to join the "Anti-Soviet pact", as it has come to be known. We hope that we can work with Poland, the Baltic states and other nations in Europe in defense against the oppressive nation of the USSR.
 
Coat_of_arms_of_the_Soviet_Union_1923%E2%80%931936  .svg

The Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics

The previous year has seen success in the industrialization of our nation allowing us to narrow the gap between the USSR and the Western imperialists and bringing much benefit to the worker. Every day that the industry of the USSR grows is another day that the lives of the worker improves. However, the previous policies of growth were separate and unconnected. In order to better address the need to further industrialize the nation to ward off potential external threat as seen in the recent actions of the imperialist League of Nations, a new plan for the industrialization, agricultural growth, and economic expansion the industrialization of the USSR shall be implemented, a Five Year Plan.

urss_soviet_poster_33.jpg

Socialist construction under Lenin's banner

The Five Year Plan shall have four goals, to increase the industrialization of the USSR, to improve the literacy of the population, to improve agricultural output, and to improve transportation around the Soviet Union. The focus of industrialization shall be to dramatically increase production of steel, agricultural implements, trains, electrification, and industrial goods to further support the growth of the USSR. Furthermore, this policy of industrialization shall provide better protection of our worker’s paradise from enemies of the proletariat, while also improving the living conditions of the worker.

urss_soviet_poster_09.jpg

Do you help to liquidate illiteracy?

We must also work to reduce the illiteracy in our nation and better educate our nation. Our nation needs educated workers to improve production and increase their knowledge of our righteous struggle against the capitalist oppressors. And most importantly, it will improve the livelihoods of Soviet women and enable them to better integrate into the productive economy of the nation.

soviet023a.jpg

Poor and middle class, increasing crops, establishing a technological culture,
and strengthening the economy!

The improved output of nation’s industry and increased urbanization of nation will require greater agricultural output to feed the worker. The new agricultural implements produced shall be immediately distributed to the agricultural worker such that agricultural productivity increases and more workers are able to move to the cities. These new agricultural implements will also serve to increase the quality life for the agricultural worker.

urss_soviet_poster_30.jpg

Furthering the development of transport within the USSR

The nation will also require the improvement of our nation’s transportation infrastructure to enable the transport of the increased production from our plan and better the ability of our people to travel with the USSR.

~ Iosif Stalin, General secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union



A Declaration by Leon Trotsky Regarding Stalin

Communist-International-1920.jpg

Communism shattering the chains of capitalist oppression

Though there has been much disagreement about how the communist nation should spread around the world and how the USSR should be part of this grand project to free the people of the world from the boot of the capitalist oppressors, Comrade Stalin and I have come to an agreement over the future leadership of the communist project. Comrade Stalin shall remain the leader of the USSR and continue in his efforts to bring the nation forward and become a shining example of the benefits of the communist system, though I personally might not agree with all of his methods, they are for the benefit of the proletariat.
I shall take charge of the International Communist Movement in support of proletarian internationalism and furthering the revolution outside of the USSR. It is my belief that through the International Communist Movement that the proletariat may be freed from the clutches of the bourgeoisie and imperialists.

Long Live the Revolution!

~Leon Trotsky, Chairman of the International Communist Movement



A Declaration regarding the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic

[video=youtube;yHBVXLORIqc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHBVXLORIqc[/video]
The Internationale in Romanian

The USSR formally recognizes the independence of the Moldavian SSR (MSSR), and their struggle against their Romanian oppressors. In light of the continued Romanian aggression, the USSR will guarantee the independence of the MSSR and transfer those units currently within the borders of the MSSR to the control of the MSSR such that they can better protect their independence. We hope to foster closer ties to this young nation in the future.

~ Georgy Chicherin, People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union
 
Last edited:
((This game looks intresting. Would love joining in next time round.)) Soz for disrupting the flow:wacko:
 
(( Join the IRC Channel, instructions on first page ))
 
xc!1920.gif


Československá republika

The Czechoslovak Republic is happy to see that our industry is growing and that our country is, once more, an attractive location for foreign investors. We would also like to calm our neighbours about their concerns on tariffs being raised upon foreign goods; our recent measures only tried to help our own enterprises without impeding the chance of a fair competence respecting the current laws, and no commercial war is intended. Our Government firmly believes that commercial interchanges are one of the ways to improve relations and keep peace en Europe, and we will pursuing such an ideal.



Edvard Beneš, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czechoslovak Republic
 
Arbeit ist schwer, ist oft genug ein freudloses und mühseliges Stochern; aber nicht arbeiten - das ist die Hölle.

The SPD and the Heidelberg Program


m0JKcyR.jpg




The SPD had kept the Erfurt Program - that made it the least revolutionary party of the International before the war - until 1921. This meant that the SPD claimed that cooperation with bourgeois order and parties was positive, and would only quicken the coming of the revolution. The party was thus willing to become the regular member of a bourgeois democracy, disregarding the doctrinaire socialists who wanted to strengthen the workers' movement only to create a truly social state. In 1921 this revisionist stance was strengthened as a it contained no reference to class struggle. The USPD and the SPD had split and the SPD was establishing itself as a moderate left-wing party, unlike the Independents and the Communists. However in 1927, after years of difficult collaboration with some of the returnees from the USPD that wanted the party to emphasize its socialist core, a new program was drafted in Heidelberg.

The SPD before the war thus saw itself as a legitimate actor in the public scene although it was denied real influence by the conservative forces. It was thus supportive of the general warlike consensus and majoritarily voted in favour of the war and supported the Kaiser's regime against the Allies. The pacifists formed the left-wing of the party and some of them would form the core of the Spartakist League but the bourgeois elites of the party under Noske refused to accuse the military after the war and instead collaborated with it to quell dissenters. But since the merging with the USPD the SPD changed its stance and instead wated the country to remain as close to the Versailles Treaty as possible. Pacifism was a trend in the 1920s, and the socialists wanted to establish good relations with the West and to achieve large-scale disarming, and the Heidelberg program attested of this change. The Socialists even said that the United States of Europe were their goal and wanted Germany to enter the League of Nations to ensure a lasting peace, casting aside the old spectres of militarism and revanchism.

The SPD was based on the power of the unions and supported workplace democracy and dialogue. The program announced that the objective wasn't the destruction of capitalism anymore but that the socialization of the means of production would be achieved by dialogue and natural changes, not by drastic ones. The SPD supported self-managed factories but had no issues with capitalism, instead it denounced wildcat strikes and wanted the workers and the industrialists to reach a consensus. Unionism was the base of socialism, they claimed and it would lead Germany to prosperity.

The Socialists then advocated for better unemployment benefits, help for jobless workers and free healthcare for those who couldn't afford. After years in the blur, they wanted to reaffirm their commitment to realist socialism and thinkers such as Bernstein, Bauer - the Austrians had been involved in the creation of the program - or Kausky had been key to the affirmation of the social-reformism stance of the party, that had thus abandoned doctrine to focus on improvement of the people's lives.
 
Die Machtmittel der Republik in die Hände von Herzens-Republikanern

The 1927 elections


M8Z4Y5s.jpg




The KPD - although Germany was close to the Soviet Union - hadn't managed to obtain large elctoral scores after it merged with most of the USPD. The Communists remained close to their old motto of everything or nothing and were opposed to the Republic as it stood. Some cnvergences were seen at a small level, with unions being defended by SPD and KPD members, but for the Communists didn't acknowledge the liberal Republic as the system Germany deserved and thus refused to create a large left-wing front wth the SPD. the SPD itself had no interest in that either and it meant that the KPD was expected to remain sidelined in 1927 too.

The SPD had reaffirmed its commitment to social change and supported the unions, and also pacifism. The SPD wanted to unite the Germans who wanted to see moderate changes to improve the quality of life of the people, and who didn't want to commit another 'European massacre'. The SPD wanted unity with Austria but not war with France, and opposed the militarism of others.

The Zentrum tried to accomodate the BVP once more but the issues between the left-wing of the party and the Bavarians were too large to be ignored and the Zentrum risked to be utterly destroyed if the plan went through. The Zentrum thus campaigned on moderation, defence of Catholics and their rights, and on small social reforms - mostly to introduce natalist policies. The Zentrum was unlikely to lose many votes, unless the Nazis in the Rhineland made a breakthrough, but it appeared resigned as far as Bavarian votes were concerned.

The DDP didn't want social reforms, instead it wanted to preserve the liberal Republic that had been built. It had given Germany prosperity, a prosperity that didn't seem to halt, and the concessions made to the workers in 1919 were enough. The DDP wanted to attract the votes of white collar clerks and civil servants who appreciated the life they had lived for the last few years.

The DVP remained monarchist at heart but as Stressemann put it, it wasn't its core issue any longer. The DVP wanted to preserve the uniqueness of Germany while making it ever more modern, and was supportive of the actions of the previous government although it deplored the loss of Austria and the fact that the ties with the United States weren't as close as they could have been.

TheWirtschaftspartei was a conservative Party that unlike the DNVP didn't concern itself with reaction. It simply wanted a conservative government, less taxes and more rights for the people. The Economic Party platformed on realism and old German common sense, and wanted to run the government as a good father would. Supporting the small peasants, the small business owners and restoring the true German values was something many members of the middle class could support, instead of the decaying DNVP.

The DNVP didn't change. Reactionary, idealizing the Empire, xenophobic and highly militarist, it still hoped the Republic could be undone. Its leaders had managed to get a President elected and maybe they could restore the Empire, to let the country go back to its natural course. It was a huge party but its lack of results meant that the people who were satisfied with the republic slowly turned away from it.

The Nazi Party had potential, but with increasing quality of life and the fact that Strasser's revolutionary theses had been disavowed; its Fuhrer didn't expect to gain power just yet.
 
640px-Kingdom_of_Romania_-_Big_CoA.svg.png


The Constitution of 1927

During a time of both internal of external strife, Romania was on the verge of a political collapse, the Transylvanians had risen in reaction to the mass-murder of Hungarians by over-zealous generals, and to compound problems the Soviet Union had invaded for the Territory of Bessarabia; also known as Moldova, using the fact that the Succession and prompt diplomatic-annexation by the Kingdom of Romania was technically recognised by an international party; although there had been little to no complaint from outside the Soviet Union itself. Under these pressures, and the fact that countries such as Germany and Turkey were worried about their minority populations in Romania, Ferdinand I; who was very near the end of his life, saw it fit to reform the Romanian Constitution to the result that it would protect minorities in the nation and modernise it.

King_Ferdinand_of_Romania.jpg

Ferdinand I of Romania

The previous constitution, which was written in 1866 was a rather paradoxically, put together when Romania was only Moldova and Wallachia; Romanians were in the Majority with very few ethnic or religious minorities: For example it decreed that only Christians could hold citizenship, and thus discriminating against the Jewish population via denying them citizenship. It did however have some quite progressive with regards to personal liberties: such as the freedom of conscience, of the press, of assembly, of religion (Albeit for christians), equality before the law: regardless of class; individual liberty and inviolability of the home. It also made capital punishment illegal during peacetime and afforded the right to property to everyone (Although, men having a deciding say with regards to property). It did have some alterations later on, such as the lifting on the offical ban on non-christian citizenship: although it was still almost impossible for Jews to gain citizenship, the electoral collage was slowly destroyed; with it being abolished in 1917 and the right to property was weaken to allow for land reform in the same year.

harta.gif

Romania in 1866

Then, for a decade there was no change made with regards to the Romanian constitution, and in result this would lead to only strife in the country. While the lack of reform was not a direct of the original Transylvanian risings (That was mostly due to Hungarian Agitation) the lack of protection would lead many; including Romanians, to call for independence and the creation of a New Transylvanian state. The lack of restrictions on the military also could have emboldened the commanders to do what was "in the best interests of the country", What they were really thinking at the time is not known however, as the trails of said commanders seamed to be more of a "witch hunt" than anything else.

Attack_on_Rebel_Position,_Somosierra,_Madrid_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg

"The Transylvanian Freedom Front"

The 1927 constitution was signed on the 22nd of January in the city of Bucharest, and its contents was again, a contradiction. It corrected previous flaws, such as citizenship for Jews and the electoral system; which finally had universal male suffrage and first-past-the-post voting for constituencies. With the situation in Transylvania, the new constitution favoured federalism over centralisation, with regions having their own Official Regional languages and the right to educate them in their own language; provided they learnt Romanian as-well. Education was rather well represented in this constitution, as educating the rural populace was the government's next goal for the nation. Next was the issue of Women's rights: They were expanded greatly, although not achieving the same suffrage level of men, they were allowed to vote in local elections, and could inherit property almost on the same grounds that men could, a widower could retain the same property of her husband and a single women could own property without a husband. This was met with some major protest from the conservatives and the aristocracy, since it means that the succession of many titles were now in dispute and it would over-turn years of conservative understanding. These issues would be eased as the monarchy would remain strictly Agnatic-Primogeniture, allowing nobles to eliminate females from succession.

Fabric_Synagogue_in_Timisoara_Romania.jpg

A Newly constructed Synagogue in Romania

The Organisation of the state was one of the most important subjects of this new constitution. It introduced a more federalised system to the Kingdom, having the Monarch at the top as the Head of State and supreme commander of the armed forces. Next came the Prime Minister, who was appointed by the Monarch in the same way the British Parliament worked, actually many things from the Romanian 1928 constitution were lifted from the British system. Then was Parliament, which had mandated elections every 4-6 years. After that came the army, where made more responsible and were given less freedom politically, mostly as a punishment for the Transylvania massacres. Under the Parliament came the regional representatives, who we elected under the Instant Run-off voting system, and represented each state (Shown Below). Below that were various municipal governments of either cities or departments. The interesting aspect of the constitution was that both Transylvania and Moldavia (Called Bessarabia) were both accounted for as states, with one being under Soviet occupation and the other being in open revolt. There were also some forward strives made with religious freedom, while the Romanian Orthodox Church and Greek-Catholic Church having preferences over other religions, freedom to practise religion and construct religious centres was guaranteed by the constitution.

Greater_Romania.svg

The Territorial divisions of the Kingdom of Romania

This constitution would change quite a bit in Romania, the way people thought of women was changed, religious minorities now had the freedom of worship and political suffrage was given to all men. These changes did have a noticeable effect on Romanian society, some of it was progressive, and there was inevitable backlash. Yet the most important result of the constitution was the way the state and Government thought of Romania itself. Romania was no longer a nation state built or the Romanian people, it was a large nation in the eastern Balkans, with many different peoples and religions, more of a Geographical than ethnic construct. The notion of Romania was changing, and the state was doing so to.
 
Last edited:
((Just a heads up, my irc presence will be minimal until Tuesday because I'm seeing family over the weekend. If anyone desperately needs to talk to France send me a PM.))