Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

IGC 2.2 Discussion

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Show only dev responses
I thought about that, and it certainly wouldn't be wrong, but I think a couple of rebellions in the region can only be historical. :)
 
Originally posted by Doomdark
I thought about that, and it certainly wouldn't be wrong, but I think a couple of rebellions in the region can only be historical. :)
Click to expand...

Yes, but uh... I usually have enough rebellions in the rest of Denmark-Norway anyway you know :)
But more importantly, It really ain't good that Sweden has no CB on Denmark if they have already taken Skåne and Gotland...

Happened in some of my games, and Sweden just doesn't look as good without Jämtland :D
 
Blah

REally... We ain't talking 'bout a Mastermind here (that's me :cool: ), more like AI or some human players.

(In my current MP-game Sweden actually only took Skåne and Gotland- don't Ask me why)

And really... We all know that Denmark truly belongs Sweden anyway :D
 
Last edited:
Isn't Gotland way easier to leave as last anyway ?
Click to expand...

Well it is a matter of taste... With time, the AI tends to leave a huge garrison on Gotland, getting bigger all the time until it starts dying of attrition. It can be a bitch to throw out the Danes when they've got 60k troops there. It is much more convenient to take Gotland early IMO.

On the other hand, Skåne is a more valuable province than Gotland. ;)
 
I actually just don't take Gotland :D I had vast tracts of lands in Northern Europe and Denmark had their capital and Gotland. I didn't really need it. Then again a Swede might think differently about that ;)
 
Doomdark, I have learned that during beta-testing of EU, Shia nations [Mameluks and Persia] received 1 colonist per year from religion. It was supposed to be used for religious conversion, but AI failed to use it adequately and Shia nations were left without colonists. Analysing history of Iran "Persia", I have read that after the conquest of former Persian territory by Safavids led by Ismail in 1501, and after he was proclaimed Shah of Iran, he declared Shia Islam the state religion and used proselytizing and force to convert the large majority of Muslims in Iran to the Shia.

I played several games as Persia and now I am even writing and posting an AAR on Persia. I had only one event [I think it wasa random event because I only had it only once and not in other games too] of Conversion of Heretics. During Ismail's rule all Sunni provinces [with Persian CB shields in the game] were converted to Shia sect. I think it should be added to the list of historic events several conversion events, so that by end of Ismail's rule all Persian national provinces would be with Shiite religion.
 
Cornelius,

If it was possible I would do it in five minutes. However, that type of event does not work in the Historical Events file. Sorry. :(
 
Originally posted by Doomdark
Cornelius,

If it was possible I would do it in five minutes. However, that type of event does not work in the Historical Events file. Sorry. :(
Click to expand...

But how do you altered historical events for Russia? Or you mean that you do not know the code of "conversion of heretics" event?
 
I am not willing to bet my life on this, but I do believe that the religious conversion event does not work correctly in the historical events monarchs file. Most types of events don't, after all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back