I checked this in my game as Zhang Xueliang. Indeed, warlords can't obtain other warlords' generals. An unfortunate omission, considering that warlords have their own content and achievements.
- 2
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I would advise you to improve three more things:
1. make it so Sinkiang joins ChUF later on historical. Currently they join mid 1937, when in reality they weren't fully allied with the Kuomintang until late 1942 I think
2. make so that Japan's AI on historical is more prone to naval invade Shanghai (and with a bigger force) to add flavor and let them exploit the International Comission modifier
3. slightly increase the buff Germany gets for operation Barbarossa. It got a bit too weak on this update and usually barely reaches Kiev.
3a. though I think Germany should have less coal to better reflect shortages of it they suffered historically.
1. make it so Sinkiang joins ChUF later on historical. Currently they join mid 1937, when in reality they weren't fully allied with the Kuomintang until late 1942 I think
2. make so that Japan's AI on historical is more prone to naval invade Shanghai (and with a bigger force) to add flavor and let them exploit the International Comission modifier
3. slightly increase the buff Germany gets for operation Barbarossa. It got a bit too weak on this update and usually barely reaches Kiev.
3a. though I think Germany should have less coal to better reflect shortages of it they suffered historically.
Last edited:
- 2
- 1
- 1
I really shouldn't be judging people on their grammar, but by Long Yun's grace these mistakes almost looks like they're intentional
And honestly, looking at what you've been talking about Yunnan, it seemed like you kinda just glazed over it with little consideration for the political status of the place.
The problem about unique focuses aren't about power nor potential, but rather uniqueness. What that Yunnan could've done historically that can't also be done by any other warlord? Khotan was engaged in a "war" with the Xinjiang Clique, Yunnan never really had anything else of sort. Oh, and you want a democratic opposition? Sure thing, that's what the main warlord political tree is for!
In short, I only have one question to you: What "unique" content can Yunnan bring to the table that confines itself within the timeline of the Second Sino-Japanese War?
Yup, got them, will be fixed in next patch
Thanks for alerting us to it.Not sure about the railway, I kind of like that the American investment encourages the construction of railways, and feel that having some pre-constructed would detract from that.
- 7
i know this is a bit weird to ask considering that this is not our update but, can you please fix the locations of the two victory points of Cao Bang and Hué (Also, please remove the diacritic, it is inaccurate) and the port in Tonkin?Yup, got them, will be fixed in next patch
Not sure about the railway, I kind of like that the American investment encourages the construction of railways, and feel that having some pre-constructed would detract from that.
Here it is shown that Prov. #9948 has a victory point that is Cao Bang. However, the province itself clearly resembles and occupies the space of Lạng Sơn province, the province immediately southeast of the real Cao Bang. The actual Cao Bang province is located in exactly Prov. #12065.
Likewise, Tonkin's port is located in Prov. #1185, on the Right Bank of the Red River. However, in real life, this area is mostly fertile deltas with no good natural spaces to serve as a port. The real place suitable for a port is located on the other side of the river, in Prov. #4119, being the place of Tonkin's largest port even to this day, Haiphong.
Going a bit south, Hué is located in Prov. #10309. However, in real life, there is a natural border in the Hải Vân pass geographically dividing Prov. #4379 and Prov. #10309. And yes, Hué is on the North of this pass. This should've been really obvious, since Prov. #4379 literally resembles the OTL current centrally-administered city and former province of (Thừa Thiên)-Huế. Albeit, #10309 is also a major province, being the place for Tourane/Đà Nẵng.
Also, the real-life Tonkin-Yunnan railway actually goes through the Left Bank of the Red River, not the Right Bank as shown currently in-game. Plus, at this point there are already railways built specificately to connect Hanoi with Haiphong and Lang Son, they should really be added.
- 2
would be very nice if you optimize the game even more because I have a potato PC: thanks
- 1
I rechecked that Turkestan is also missing new Sinkiang core owned by Khotan Ma. #1042 - Khotan.was really nice of you to fix all of these! I checked them, and everything seems pretty good now with new states. There is only one more required Siberian state that player can't core under Turan, but I assume that’s a design choice, so I don't mind.
There is just a tiny detail missing regarding Turkestan:
Fixes for Turan core and assimilation after No Compromise, No Surrender (list of all missing new states)
Summary Fixes for Turan core and assimilation after No Compromise, No Surrender (list of all missing new states) Platform Steam Operating System Windows 11 Game Version 1.17.* Enabled DLC All of the above Do you have mods enabled? No...forum.paradoxplaza.com
I realized after submitting my bug report that although Altai (ALT) has core states required for the formable nation of Turkestan, but the tag itself cannot form it. ALT should be added to the list of eligible nations.
Since Maymanah #1007 (Afghanistan) was added to Turan, it should likely be included as a core for Turkestan as well. However, it should not be a requirement for forming the nation. Fighting an entire additional country for just one state would be too punishing for players trying to form Turkestan as a minor power.
PLUS:
This is not about formables:
Please add Uzbek core to Maymanah in normal game in addition to Turkmen core. Its little bit disputed region in central asia.
- 1
Can you at least show how to use it? It is not used in game nor have documentation...
has_any_grand_doctrine = yes/no do not work, {} also throw error
You added trigger but do not updated documentation nor showed how to use it.
It is just a step better than "Added new trigger/effect for docrines"
This does not appear to work when I tested it today, I am still a subject after the intervention timed event was concluded peacefully.
Last edited:
- 1
Is the Hiroshima Naval Engineering Facility supposed to be out of supply by default?
- 1
why does Philippines army advisors like Paulino Santos and Russell Volkman that aren't generals? they already have tiny advisor portraits
- 2
- 1
I can not release puppet states when I play as Wang Jingwei's China. Seems the requirement will never be fullfilled
Initially, I was not a fan of this new energy mechanic at all. Now, with this patch, my opinion has completely changed. This is awesome, really awesome! Not only does this add more depth to the game, but it also makes sense and is historical. Well done, Paradox! GG -- this is really, really cool!
- 1
- 1
- 1