Rosacrux said:The hellenized (macedonian had greek culture, nevertheless, not to mention that they were greek to begin with) parts of Egypt were Alexandria, Kyrene and another area on the opposite side of the Delta I don't remember now. Also, there's this thing: which classes should be considered the carriers of the provincial culture? The upper classes in both Seleucid empire and Egypt were Greeks and hellenized locals and while the lower classes in most provinces were predominately locals, it's not easy to decide on the culture that or the other way.
The Victoria approach with different POPs having different cultures would be definitely more realistic, but seing Rome is a stripped down EU3 (which in turn has 1/10 of the complexity Vicky sports) such an approach would be out of Paradox's plans for this game.
Well, I'd say it would be realistic to give them Greek culture (to Egypt too) but keep most provinces to their local culture, to represent the division between the official state culture (and the ruling class elite culture) vs the people's culture. Some provinces in Egypt should be Greek culture to begin with but those would be few.
I believe having the characters (representing the ruling class) as a different culture than the majority of the population is enough of a representation for game purposes. We can of course go into details about the actual culture split for an eternity, but that still won't allow us to represent it any better in the game. I think I'll stick with Macedonian culture (since it exists, even though the differences between it an Greek culture are rather ambiguous) for Egypt and Seleucia, since both of them are Diadochi empires.