Ruler leading an army don't trigger a Regency

[hquijanog]

Information​

I have verifed my game files (Steam only)​

Yes

I have disabled all mods​

Yes

I am running the latest game update​

Yes

Required​

Summary​

Ruler leading an army don't trigger a Regency

Description​

Every time you leave your court to lead an army, like in a war or raid, your designed regent don't takes your place like it does when you are in an activity like hunting.
I think this is a defect and a miss chance to for new events to trigger.
Potentially you could be many years leading your army fighting on the crusades in the other side of the world and no one is helping you ruling your realm.
By having a regent for these situations, you could have a regent that slowly tries to take your throne and triggers a civil war, very similar like the Robin Hood stories.

Steps to reproduce​

Make your ruler lead any army and send it away to another part of the world. Regency never triggers even if you stay outside your realm for decades.

Game Version​

1.10.2

Platform​

Windows

Additional Information​

Affected Feature​

• Events
• Gameplay

Save Game​

Other Attachments​

 

[Herennius]

This is (at least for the time being) by design, as implementing it proved troublesome in multiple ways during development. The designeres, especially @Wokeg , explained the reasons multiple times, e.g. here:

regency and war (again)

I really like the new features sof the dlc. But making no regeancy while leading army during war is really disturbing - you go feast to neighbor province : you got a regency - Wagin war in the holy land for years : no regency Hope this will be...

forum.paradoxplaza.com

However, it is not completely off the table that in some distant future this might change.