While it made a fun game. There are some buggy incoherences when excommunication, revocation and a war against a vassal claiming his king title are mixed.
Here king A has B as heir (who himself has king A as heir) and 3 wars against him, an excommunication, a revocation and a vassal claiming his king title ("war for England").
When excommunication war is lost, king becomes B, but the other two wars continued (at least the millisecond needed to conclude the other peaces).
It seems instead of being at war with B the vassal claiming the king title remained at war with A (now a duke). Making a peace with him, who had no claim on him, he (and all his supporters) became independant, not giving a claim on their titles to king B either nor gaining the king title.
Instead of ending when B was crowned, the revocation war continued too, against him. And so when B lost the winner got the option to... re-crown king A.
Here king A has B as heir (who himself has king A as heir) and 3 wars against him, an excommunication, a revocation and a vassal claiming his king title ("war for England").
When excommunication war is lost, king becomes B, but the other two wars continued (at least the millisecond needed to conclude the other peaces).
It seems instead of being at war with B the vassal claiming the king title remained at war with A (now a duke). Making a peace with him, who had no claim on him, he (and all his supporters) became independant, not giving a claim on their titles to king B either nor gaining the king title.
Instead of ending when B was crowned, the revocation war continued too, against him. And so when B lost the winner got the option to... re-crown king A.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
