Originally posted by BiB
But seriously now, who cares ??
Here is a portion of a post I left you before why I care and why Paradox should (it was removed for whatever reason)...
Originally posted by BiB
For some reason people always feel moderators aren't allowed to vent their opinions if they disagree with sommink. Happens on every board. Moderators tend to be normal users who also have moderation duties. Doesn't mean they should stop being a user with opinions. Also doesn't make them a bad moderator.
Personally I have been playing with a silly AQ871 whatever name from day 1 even though I knew how to change it. If I had come accross ur query earlier I'd prolly have answered if it wasn't already but I also have stated that I wouldn't care about it. So what ? Is that such an enormous crime ? U can state ur opinion, I can state mine, people are free to state their opinions, no ?
And I really don't see what a dev team of all teams should do about a user airing his opinion
If u ever would be needing me again, I'll be up Huszics's arse 
First off, if people ask the question (especially within the FAQ section), then obviously they are looking for a serious answer instead of a snippy response. Not everybody likes to see their save files as their computer's name. It creates a feeling of detachment and unreality in the game, and everytime I've started my game, I'm wondering what the hell is wrong with the
game, not me... It simply doesn't looks professional, and as the game gets more and more popular within NA, I think you'll see this question more and more often.
A Graphic User Interface "form tag" or Prompt Box asking for a players name should not be the toughest thing in
the world and should be a breeze to implement. Personally, I don't think there should be a whole Dev team sitting
back working on bugs... the game should have been released as flawlessly as they could get it, not rush it out the
door with various spelling errors, bugs (I mean a bug in the turtorial for Christs' sake), and a manual that reads
more like a history textbook rather than a document on game mechanics.
As an amateur game reviewer, I definitely question these shortcomings, but no worries, the game is still great (would you believe I hate RTS?); but mention has to be made to potential buyer's of this game that the lack of intuitive play, and the serious problems users may encounter without having access to this site may seriously hamper immediate gratification and buyer satisfaction. As posters at this forum, it's really hard to imagine people without the internet, but trust me, they're out there, and it's these people that will ultimately suffer from not having good, solid documentation and access to this forum.
That is why it's important for criticism from consumers to be taken gravely, it'll only help the company in the long run if they address concerns as quickly and helpfully as possible. A happy customer is a repeat customer. Frankly, if I bought this game as is... well, put it this way, the game would have been off my hard drive in a flash, and returned promptly. Again, only the online support and the working patches are its' saving grace.
Oh, BTW... as a moderator myself at PCGR.com and VideoGameReview.com, I don't believe it's in good form to be as opinionated as our helpful friend Huszics. We are there to moderate, not confront posters on their queries... My suggestion on that is separate business from pleasure... If you really wish to post topics or suggestions which may not illicit the best response, just do it under a different Username.
Finally, Huszics, I would have got the majority of my questions answered on your webpage, but unfortunately it really doesn't like my machine. Every time I begin to load your page, it crashes my browser, and only a
reboot corrects the problem...
