You cannot be serious. Ciryandor gave away what this role is by asking to sub back in for LS. Kill the role and let vLN sub someone else.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You cannot be serious. Ciryandor gave away what this role is by asking to sub back in for LS. Kill the role and let vLN sub someone else.
There is nothing in the rules that forbid players from announcing or implying their roles, real or not, and I don't consider players as subbed out until I made a post that their were.
So I don't see on what grounds I should actually execute Ciryandor :wacko:
It could badly damage the game to have this role in play until the deadline. Leaving it in play any longer would be utterly irresponsible by the players as well as the GM.
unvote trespoe
vote vLN
Unfortunately, I regret to inform my fellow wizards that I will be attending a "Mock Ministry" (Model UN) meeting in Newcastle for the next few days, and as such, may be able to send in my votes via the post (i.e. if I have time/access to a computer), but also may not. I will return Sunday.
Anyway. While I agree that vLN/Cir issue is bad, it also seems to imply that he's just an ordinary wizard, which I support. So I will not join this bandwagon.
Anyway, I'm still suspicious about Rysz. It could be an accident, or not. But I'll Vote Rysz today.
OOC: Yeah, so I'll be going to a Model UN thing for a few days - and I probably won't be able to vote, I might one day, but not all three I'd imagine. So you can sub me if you want (although seeing as we have more "permanently gone" players it would seem a little silly to sub me just for a few votes) or kill my role if I don't vote like a normal person, or whatever you want. But I will be back on Sunday.
So yep. That's all.
Anyway. While I agree that vLN/Cir issue is bad, it also seems to imply that he's just an ordinary wizard, which I support. So I will not join this bandwagon.
Anyway, I'm still suspicious about Rysz. It could be an accident, or not. But I'll Vote Rysz today.
OOC: Yeah, so I'll be going to a Model UN thing for a few days - and I probably won't be able to vote, I might one day, but not all three I'd imagine. So you can sub me if you want (although seeing as we have more "permanently gone" players it would seem a little silly to sub me just for a few votes) or kill my role if I don't vote like a normal person, or whatever you want. But I will be back on Sunday.
So yep. That's all.
The GM has made his opinion quite clear. The only reason I see why you are continuing this debate is because you are giving your packmate Ciryandor (now von Loch Ness) an alibi
The GM has made his opinion quite clear. The only reason I see why you are continuing this debate is because you are giving your packmate Ciryandor (now von Loch Ness) an alibi
Then lynch me.
The only reason I can see the GM leaving that role in play is that Ciryander's ghost comment was a lie, the role is a wolf and vLN would get autokilled with no chance to sub again.
I am voting that Ciryander/vLN role until it is gone or I am gone.
Vote jonti-h
If someone votes a dead person I am willing to let that slide, but if someone else votes the same dead person on the same page after it has been well established that he is dead there is only one proper course of action.
I agree.
Vote jonti-h
Didn't know that.
@slinkface, my forum is set so the pages are displayed recent first, so it was not established that AVN was dead to me at least.
Unvote AVN, Slinky, he stinks. And he voted on me, which is nasty.
If the page is displayed first or last shouldn't matter, it shows the same posts. So unless you have the amount of posts per page on a different setting it would still be on the same page
It was stated by the GM that he was asking as of his last post that I was still in the game as of my last post prior to this, since the declaration that I was subbed out had NOT been given yet; and that I am available IF Lord Strange were to be subbed out and nobody else was available. The point I was making on saying that is on the availability, and NOT on the eligibility. It would be the GM's prerogative, knowing each player's role/trait, IF such a role WERE eligible for subbing by the person subbing in. You can draw any conclusion you wish from that, but it is only a statement that I can do it, not that I would be ALLOWED to, regardless of whatever role/trait either one of us has. If you have further objections, I'd rather PM the GM.
In different news: At least I had the decency to ask for a sub instead of zombieing.
In different news: At least I had the decency to ask for a sub instead of zombieing.
If it hasn't happened yet, could I be sub out, please? I lost track of the game long ago.
Yes, not exactly a mass suicide but more like a hostile zombie takeover...
@GM: Can I sub for the 5-6 guys that want out? It would be so nice with my own voting block.
Yes, not exactly a mass suicide but more like a hostile zombie takeover...
@GM: Can I sub for the 5-6 guys that want out? It would be so nice with my own voting block.
Well, only if you agreed to let me win.
If the page is displayed first or last shouldn't matter, it shows the same posts. So unless you have the amount of posts per page on a different setting it would still be on the same page
It doesn't. Try it.
Also what the hell is with the bandwagon on me?
I'd expect it from Yakman and Syber Sid, but the rest of you?