• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
Status
Not open for further replies.

rageair

CK3 Game Director
Paradox Staff
43 Badges
Sep 10, 2011
1.824
11.488
  • Cities in Motion
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • War of the Vikings
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Magicka
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • The Showdown Effect
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • 500k Club
  • War of the Roses
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV
Greetings!

The weather is slowly recovering from the chaotic mixture of snow/rain/hail/sun that has plagued the Swedish April and work is starting on the next, yet undisclosed, expansion! The next expansion is going to have a specific theme which most features will be focused around (we can unfortunately not go into any detail in this DD), though we also want to add some features that can be of use regardless of who or where you choose to play. One of these is planned to be a ‘Casus Belli Expansion’, where we want to add new and oft-requested CBs to the game. The Focus is going to be on CBs that enhance the early and late game (as well as a few more roleplay-focused CBs). While this is by no means a final list, it’s what we’ve made so far:


Forced Vassalization
This is a CB that can be used against neighboring realms to force them to become your vassal. To avoid making it too powerful it’s quite heavily limited, only realms that are of a lower tier, under 30 realm size and where the ruler is of either your culture group or religion are valid targets. It also has a direct cost (prestige). For example; this can allow England to, with time, extend ‘protection’ to the smaller Welsh and Irish realms.


De Jure Duchy Claim
This CB was added to try to avoid situations where massive realms would fight over one single county, essentially destroying their armies for near no gain. Players often think these types of wars aren’t worth fighting, and do not usually declare them themselves - instead they turn to Holy Wars or invite duchy claimants to expand in a more meaningful way. This CB provides interesting opportunity for conquest at the point where you form your first Kingdom or Empire. Any vassals present in conquered lands are preserved, and this CB also comes with a prestige cost.


Ducal County Conquest
At the very start of a game you might be stuck waiting for fabricated claims a very, very long time if you’re unlucky. This CB is available to Count and Duke tier characters, and allows you to go to war over any County that are part of a Duchy you hold land in, as long as the Duchy has no holder. The CB has a cost of prestige and gold, making it similar to a fabricated claim (as that’s essentially what it is). As an example, this gives count-tier characters in Ireland and the HRE an alternate way to claim a Duke-tier title, presuming that you can save up enough prestige and money.


Great Conquest
Unless you are playing as a Muslim, Nomad or Tribal-cultured ruler (who have access to invasions) you have no real way to expand in a meaningful way when you are playing as the ruler of a very large realm. While we still want expansion to be difficult, we also want to give players more static opportunities to expand. This CB is available to very powerful realms (at least 200 realm size) and can be used to claim an entire Kingdom from another character. Though the catch is that you have to fight someone that is as strong or stronger than you are, and using the CB itself costs a massive amount of prestige and piety.


Free Hostages
A long-requested CB, this allows you to go to war against a character in order to free any kidnapped concubines or wives, and release certain characters from prison (i.e. friends and dynastants). Rescued characters will, most often, be moved back to your court. It will also take hostages in turn, imprisoning a random close member of the target’s family!

It’s currently not possible to attack anyone who holds a close dynastic member in their prison (i.e. your child), is this something you’d like to see changed specifically for use with this CB? Otherwise it'll be of use primarily for freeing concubines (something that has been requested for a long time!).


Note that these CBs are by no means finished, and are currently being tested internally. Feel free to comment and feedback on them though, and also feel free to tell us what CBs you would like to see added!
 
This is a much needed addition, and I would like to extend it to cover kidnapped husbands, wives and children too, possibly also kidnapped or imprisoned vassals as well. The risk of the kidnapper killing my kidnapped relative in order not to have them released, is something I will have to live with then.
It should cover all those cases except kidnapped vassals. Note that you still can't actually declare the war if they have a close relative in their prison though (as it stands now).

Also can I suggest a piety cost to some CB's? Going to war without a claim isn't a very christian thing to do and bypasses the authority of the church.
Some of them will have a piety cost, we're still testing and tweaking to see what feels right. :)
 
I'm mostly ok with these changes so long as they come at a significant enough cost to be limited. One part of the game that I actually really like is scheming for claims (whether through marrying someone with an intention of getting a claim in the next generation, or through inviting a claimant and going that way. I do hope that that remains the primary method of expansion for Christian rulers (as it's one of the fun and different parts of CK2).
You seem to be working off of the assumption that these CBs are meant to replace claims. In fact the old ways to expand (Marriage, inviting Claimants, Holy Wars, etc) are all supposed to be the superior ways to expand. Inviting a Duchy Claimant rather than using the De Jure Duchy CB has no associated extra cost, for example (and it also gives you a very loyal vassal, while vassals acquired via De Jure Duchy Claim might not be as thrilled...).

My other concern is the possibility that AI blobs will get even nastier (e.g. the ERE immediately launching duchy conquests on Croatia and Apulia; those starts are already precarious enough if you don't want to swear fealty to an empire on day 1).
Empires need to pay quite a hefty sum of prestige to use De Jure Duchy claims, and if they do decide to attack for an entire Duchy, any vassals within the targeted area will be preserved.

I'm probably going to be in the minority, but I really don't like most of the proposed CBs. Forcing Christian rulers to rely on claims to expand emphasizes the importance of the marriage game, which is one of CK2s most interesting features. Expanding the number and power of CBs will dilute the importance of the marriage game and reduce interest in the game's characters.

In general, I like the slowed rate of expansion. it encourages a relative level of stability Christiandom that serves to make even small changes to the map interesting. And I can always play a Muslim ruler if I want to play a game where expand rapidly.
The new CBs aim specifically to not de-emphasize the importance of marriages & claims. What they do aim for is to reduce the frustration when lady fortune seems to have abandoned you - it provides you with more options and more paths to take, though these alternate paths will be limited heavily by costs and specific requirements.

Might I suggest a Holy War, that will lead to forced conversion of the top holder?
We've been toying with this idea, but having it unrestricted risks being seriously overpowered. It would need a set of specific conditions, or a rare opportunity presented via event, to be feasible.

Would be great if it would possible to turn the more powerfull ones off with game rules.
Naturally, we tend to add game rules for features such as this. Such game rules wouldn't have to be limited to the new CB's either, I know people have been asking for a game rule to disable the super-powerful 'Invasion' CB's in general. I'm of the opinion that more rules are always better. :)

This primarily makes Christian/Zorastrian/Dharmic expansion much easier. While I don't have a problem with that, I believe they should eat a corresponding nerf to stability in exchange, just like how Muslims have Decadence, Pagans have Elective Gavelkind, and Nomads have unstable realms.

Games can get blobby enough as is, making it easier with these CBs without any corresponding nerf just makes christians even more powerful than they already are.

If we are to make expansion easier, we should make collapse easier as well. Christian superblobs are quite frankly more of a problem than Muslim or Pagan ones, as there is no real mechanic to permanently shatter a feudal realm.
I'm not entirely sure why you would think it'd be much easier - all of these CBs are significantly restricted and only work within specific niches. The point is to present alternatives that are slightly weaker than existing ways to expand, with an additional cost of one or more resources. If you're a ways into a game you will have plenty of better alternatives to choose from, i.e. by inviting Claimants, asking the Pope for Claims or Invasions (if Catholic) or waging Holy Wars.

The claim-system is what makes ck2 different. I can see no need for this unhistorical arcade-style changes. If you want to conquer large areas in a short time, you can already play as pagan or a mod or total war.
Again, I don't see the validity in this assumption. Why do you think it'd be a way to conquer large areas in a short time? As mentioned above, these CBs are all fairly limiting, both by requiring fairly specific conditions to be used, and by requiring a cost. Also, almost every way to expand already in the game is going to be more powerful (see examples above). These CBs aim only to reduce frustration and provide opportunity where before there was none
As an example, let's say that Byzantium loses an invasion of Anatolia. As it stands there's no equivalent of an 'invasion' style CB that could regain that territory for them, while Muslims have an invasion they can use for 1000 piety. All this adds is a way for such a war to be fought at all - and only if it is against an enemy much stronger than you, AND only if you pay a hefty price of prestige and piety.
 
What about a CB to destroy someone's top title (I am looking mostly at HRE and Abbasids)?
This is another idea we're toying with, like the previously mentioned force conversion CB that Wuddel mentioned it's something that can't be used lightly though. It would have to require extremely specific circumstances, or only be presented through a scripted opportunity of some sort. Have you got any ideas on when such a CB would feel fair to use?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.