• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.

Johan

Studio Manager Paradox Tinto
Administrator
Paradox Staff
Moderator
15 Badges
Dec 14, 1999
21.950
255.036
  • Diplomacy
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Magicka
  • Starvoid
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • War of the Roses
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
Hello and Welcome to another Tinto Talks, the Happy Wednesday where we give out information about our super top secret game with the codename Project Caesar, so that you can give us feedback!

Today we will talk about some of the changes to the diplomacy and warfare mechanics we have done since we started doing these Tinto Talks.


Diplomatic Expenses
As you may have seen, in some previous Tinto Talks we added another expense to the economy to give more control to the player. The cost for this Diplomatic Expense is based on the tax base of your country, and the more you spend, the greater benefits your diplomatic corps gets.

56_diplospending.png

If you play France you may have this maximized, but may not if you play a smaller country without subjects unless you you want to be able to maintain an alliance with a bigger and stronger country.


Antagonism
In older GSGs we made, we had a concept called ‘Badboy’ which impacted how badly you had behaved and other countries would treat you more harshly according to it. This evolved into the Aggressive Expansion systems we used in Eu4 and Imperator which had a direct impact on opinions that also allowed Coalitions to be formed.

While these were useful systems, they all were a bit limited;as a global variable in your country it was too broad, and as merely opinion impacts, it was rather hidden and hard to get overviews.

In Project Caesar we developed a new system called “biases” which has static impacts and temporary values that change over time, like opinions work in most of our games. We had this for Opinions and Trust, and when we were not happy with AE and neither were you, we decided to scrap AE and instead make a new bias, which we call Antagonism.

Antagonism indicates how other countries are likely to view us. If they feel a lot of antagonism towards us, countries that consider us as relevant to their interests will be less inclined to engage in diplomacy and may act against our interests. Antagonism is caused by basic differences between countries' societal values, government types, religion, culture and language, and actions can cause an antagonism 'bomb' in a location that affects the countries near it to varying degrees depending on how much they care about that location and about the antagonistic country. Antagonism 'bomb' effects will generally dissipate with time. Antagonism also affects a country's opinion of you.

Of course, a country needs to have caused a certain amount of Antagonism against you before you can join a coalition. The overall effect of this is that you can get away with fewer antagonism ‘bomb’ effects against countries that have a baseline of antagonism for you before they start thinking about forming coalitions against you, and countries that are more similar to you will probably allow a bit more to slide.

56_antagonism.png

Ottomans will always have a base antagonism to Byzantium..

Independence Movements
Trying to become independent as a subject is usually a tough life. In some previous GSGs you could ask another country to support your independence and they could help you in a war. To make this better, we took inspiration from Crusader Kings where subjects usually band together to fight for independence. As we have the International Organization code, we made a new type of it, called Independence Movements. Any subject with a loyalty below 50% can start such a movement, and any subject can join it. Other countries can be invited as well, and the goal of the war is to get independence for all subjects!

56_indep.png

Probably need some more members for this..



Civil War Surrenders
Sometimes you are in a civil war and you know you are about to lose, and it's just a matter of time, so we added in an action to surrender in a Civil War when the other side is more than twice the size than the other.

And as some of you pointed out, losing a civil war as soon as possible to avoid it, may or may not be an exploit, so currently there are some penalties to jumping to the new country.

56_civil_war.png

At least Scotland will be free!


Naval Combat
During testing, we discovered that with all types of ships having the same frontage made it so that you wanted to stack almost purely the biggest ships and the rest were not useful. So instead they now have different frontages, so the categories have different roles.

Heavy Ships have a frontage of 2 and a combat speed of 0.5 & Galleys get 0.5 frontage, but their combat speed is 1. Light ships get higher initiative and combat speed, and have a frontage of 1.

New Objectives
When we talked about the military objectives, there was a request to add automated rebel suppression, and this was something we definitely added in. We have now also added a Hunt Navies that works like the Hunt Armies, and tries to engage and destroy enemy navies when spotted in the designated areas.

We are also looking into adding a few more objectives, like defending the coasts or focused sieges, and will tell you when more are implemented.

Logistics Improvements
While we were very happy with having a logistics system in the game, and where food mattered, it was a little bit limited in that you could only trace supply two locations away at most. So we introduced a concept called Logistics Distance, and now every single army traces a path to the closest valid supply source. The length that can be traced can be extended through advances in several of the later ages.

A valid supply source is a Supply Depot, a port or seazone with a navy carrying food that will distribute it to you, or a province-capital that is under control of a country giving you food access and actually has food.

Supply paths can only be traced through friendly controlled territory, but not through any location that belongs to the Zone of Control of a hostile fort.

We also made it so that armies can only carry a single month's supply of food with them, except for the auxiliary units, which can carry many months for several regiments each. This means that even if you can march deep into unprotected territory or have the ability to ignore the Zone of Control for forts, you need to get a supply path to the source you can get food from.

Of course, you can always see the path your armies trace supply from when you have selected an army, as a thin green arrow goes from the supply source to the army.

56_papermap_logistics.png

Here I walked past the Lithuanian armies (I used the remove fog of war cheat code, as they would have been hidden for me otherwise), and tracing supplies from Goriadz, and they will easily be able to cut my supplies by movingmy moving into Lipsk. This is the paper-map-mode where everything is icons on the map.



Monthly Attrition Losses
One thing that was requested by you guys was the ability to see how much attrition a unit has taken recently, so we added some history to it, so you can see how many died in the last year.

56_attrition.png

My army lacks food to continue the siege… a few more months at most..


Recruit Admiral/General
Another worry that was pointed out by the community was the potential lack of generals or admirals for your units. So we added two new actions where you can recruit either a general or an admiral for your country for gold. The price is based on the economy of your country, but the price is reduced by the military ability of the ruler.

The abilities of the new commander depends on the current army or navy tradition, which is also reduced a bit by recruiting a new commander.


56_general.png




Next week we’ll go through the mixed collection of all other major changes we have done..
 
Last edited:
  • 165Love
  • 160Like
  • 9
  • 9
Reactions:
  • 29Like
  • 10
  • 7
  • 2
  • 1Love
Reactions:
  • 23Haha
  • 10
  • 6Like
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
  • 27Haha
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
  • 107Like
  • 10
  • 8Love
  • 3
Reactions:
Since this is the TT about diplomacy changes, are there no Rivalry changes? :(

It's the only one thing I'm most concerned about coming back from EU4. It feels forced and gamey, and it feels like I have to arbitrarily pick some countries bc the game told me to to not get any debuffs and not what I naturally want to do

yeah, no good ideas yet.
 
  • 64
  • 23Like
Reactions:
"They will not be allowed to be a member of your cabinet"
Is this a temporary modifier after recruiting a general or will characters recruited like this never be able to join a cabinet?

they will never unless X
 
  • 28Like
  • 14
  • 2Love
  • 2
  • 1Haha
  • 1
Reactions:
Personally, I think changing from AE to Antagonism, when it comes to forming coalitions makes sense.
It opens more possibilities for Coalitions forming, for reasons other than expansion. Like for example: Coalitions forming against revolution birthplace, as it did happen historically with France.

that is part of the design reasons
 
  • 90Like
  • 15Love
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
  • 42Like
  • 6Haha
  • 4
  • 2
Reactions:
  • 19Haha
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Would it be viable for terrain to matter in terms of supply distance, or would this be too complicated for the player? It should be harder to supply an army over mountains than over flat plains, but I can imagine that could be annoying and difficult to communicate to the player.

yes, its based on movement cost.
 
  • 62Like
  • 25Love
  • 5
Reactions:
As far as I understand we will be able to direct our armies from manually selecting the route to go through different checkpoints. from point A to B you can reach through point X. Am I right?
If I am right, you are a GOD. Thank you God for such amazing developers like Johan the Great.

yes, we have got shift-paths in all GSG's since eu1.
 
  • 48Like
  • 8Haha
  • 6Love
  • 3
  • 2
Reactions:
Will troops still be able to resupply food from a hostile location they are capturing, or from an occupied/friendly location they are standing in/marching through?

if they control the province capital, and it has food it can take from there.
 
  • 22Like
  • 18
  • 3
Reactions:
  • 48Like
  • 3
  • 1Love
Reactions:
In my opinion, religion should affect antagonism about twice as much as culture/language, especially before the rise of nationalism. Even antagonism towards a different religion in the same group could be notably high, because, well, just look at the friendly history between catholics and orthodox, or catholics and protestants, or sunni and shia.

agree, changed it
 
  • 63Like
  • 43Love
  • 4
  • 3
Reactions:
Can there be several coalitions against you? It would make sense for example that countries in India aren't coordinating with countries in Mexico.

hmm.. no
 
  • 109
  • 20
  • 8Like
  • 4
  • 1Love
Reactions:
I love the logistic changes. Supply lines have been a dream of many a GSG gamer for over a decade. I can tell this game is made by people who love the genre.

It is truly a game changer!
 
  • 85Like
  • 8Love
  • 7
Reactions:
Could both the pops and subjects of a rebellious culture join together in a rebellion against their overlord? (As in the pops already incorporated into the ruling country)

not atm, its not an easy solution.
 
  • 48
  • 10Like
  • 2
Reactions:
How does the supply path trace through enemy controlled Lipsk in the image when the dev diary says that it can only trace through friendly controlled locations?

no hostiles
 
  • 26
  • 11Like
Reactions:
View attachment 1271891
What country's flag is that on the left???

(I hope this is not the flag of the Duchy of Rawa - because if so, it's a bad color scheme that doesn't fit Mazovia)
We have the issue that the traditional designs for Płock and Rawa are almost identical unless we change a colour. For countries that are adjacent and in a very similar situation under Poland, it's not ideal at all. If you have suggestions we'd love to hear them.

1743003553685.png
 
  • 45Haha
  • 22
  • 18Like
  • 1
Reactions: