Nice try.
But no. I know that URL by heart already, having used it so often. Yes, the wikipedia link IS indeed real.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Nice try.
But no. I know that URL by heart already, having used it so often. Yes, the wikipedia link IS indeed real.
Post #161: JDMS bandwagons me with:
That makes the score (count in post #161):
randakar - 4
Everyone else - 1
"might as well" is not a reason - it's a classic case of wolfish bandwagon jumping.
I should have redirected the lynch to him perhaps (and avoided the tie maybe) but ah well. Here's for second chances:
Vote JDMS
That's what the evidence against JDMS amounts to.
I know it's not much. The case against Saintix is probably better ..
So from what I gather the JDMS bandwagon doesn't have any substantial backing?
Which make Lemeard and Walrus the most logical targets for lynching. Walrus for creating a shallow bandwagon and Lemeard for creating illogical ties.
Vote remains as is.
Which make Lemeard and Walrus the most logical targets for lynching. Walrus for creating a shallow bandwagon and Lemeard for creating illogical ties.
Vote remains as is.
No it doesn't. I have heard *no* case against walrus. At all.
He's just getting voted for no reason. Look at Saintix.
Saintix said:
WHY?!?
edit: also, gief count!
(cue jonti)
Walrus because he started the shallow Bandwagon on JDMS.
Though still I'm voting on Lemeard, not Walrus.
He voted JDMS after JDMS voted him?
Sounds like a perfectly valid reason to vote someone to me.
So like I said - no case
edit: If anyone started that "bandwagon" - it's not, since this is a close run vote - it would be me. Thanks.
Thanks
He voted JDMS after JDMS voted him?
Sounds like a perfectly valid reason to vote someone to me.
So like I said - no case
Good point. I still vote Lemeard ;-)
Any time.
And I don't see much of a case on JDMS either <_<
@Lem: Kinky
So who do you think is a good suspect jonti? I haven't heard you say much yet, but you must have ideas about it.
edit: and since I clearly failed at it yesterday maybe you are a better person to pick a good lynch for tonight
So who do you think is a good suspect jonti? I haven't heard you say much yet, but you must have ideas about it.
edit: and since I clearly failed at it yesterday maybe you are a better person to pick a good lynch for tonight
I can't help feeling that this game is a bit "evidence light" at the moment. Until we catch a wolf - which will hopefully be tonight - or the seer gets a ping, there is not a lot that I personally can do, my analysis has sadly been always like this.
So, that leaves me with assumptions and gut instincts.
Hax's reaction seems a little extreme, but maybe that is because he was being voted on in both games.
Lemeard's snipe? Well while it is Lemeard, he can't be discounted.
Saintis strikes me as an odd one. If it wasn't his first game, I would vogte him ahead of Hax. His postings seem a little strange, and his reticence to lynch anyone is appearing more strange.
Just my thoughts.
Votecount - 0 hours and 23 minutes until deadline.
Leaders are underlined.
JDMS (4) : walrus, randakar, the_hdk, Hax
Hax (3) : Raczynski v2, Lemeard, jonti-h
walrus (3): JDMS, marty99, Saintis
Lemeard (2) : Kaetje, Slinky
Not voted: Ciryandor
WARNING! CIRYANDOR, YOU MUST VOTE BEFORE DEADLINE OR YOU WILL BE SUBBED!
Leaders are underlined.
JDMS (4) : walrus, randakar, the_hdk, Hax
Hax (3) : Raczynski v2, Lemeard, jonti-h
walrus (3): JDMS, marty99, Saintis
Lemeard (2) : Kaetje, Slinky
Not voted: Ciryandor
WARNING! CIRYANDOR, YOU MUST VOTE BEFORE DEADLINE OR YOU WILL BE SUBBED!
Come on folks, switch. In case you haven't noticed, it's 3-3-3 JDMS-walrus-hax right now. Surely the village doesn't want that.
Vote Hax
I don't have to like it... but he's being more of a baddie than walrus is for me.
@ GM
I know I know.
I don't have to like it... but he's being more of a baddie than walrus is for me.
@ GM
I know I know.
Votecount - 0 hours and 14 minutes until deadline.
Leaders are underlined.
Hax (3) : Raczynski v2, Lemeard, Ciryandor
JDMS (3) : walrus, the_hdk, Hax
walrus (3): JDMS, marty99, Saintis
Lemeard (2) : Kaetje, Slinky
Saintis (2) : randakar, jonti-h
Everyone voted
Leaders are underlined.
Hax (3) : Raczynski v2, Lemeard, Ciryandor
JDMS (3) : walrus, the_hdk, Hax
walrus (3): JDMS, marty99, Saintis
Lemeard (2) : Kaetje, Slinky
Saintis (2) : randakar, jonti-h
Everyone voted