Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

WW Lite CLXXXI Dragon Warrior 4 Chap. 4

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Did you hear that, TT? He's calling you a faker.

Though it -is- true. You are faking being a villager, when in reality, you are wolf scum.

Vote Thistletooth, the outed by the People's Justice League wolf.
 
unvote marty99
vote thistletooth
 
i'm not a wolf. this is stupid.
 
Yakman said:
i'm not a wolf. this is stupid.
Click to expand...

Then start making some explanations for your votes, and actually engaging with the game. Simples.
 
I sense the chances for a tie:eek::D
 
jonti-h said:
Then start making some explanations for your votes, and actually engaging with the game. Simples.
Click to expand...

I am with Jonti-h on this, I don't care what the reason you give is for day 1, Random.org, LSST, Counter Vote, Continuing a bandwagon, Must survive, anything really, just at least give us something. Otherwise a wolf could hide in you lack of information. There are two a thing a wolf desires, a lack of information and incorrect information. Both are what allow them to hunt freely at night, and well it harder to find the incorrect information on day 1 (Everyone claims to be human, 1 person is most correct as he is the seer, the other 3 are flat out lying , those that don't even give us the most flimsiest of reasoning are all we have to work on.
 
@Eternaly_Lost:While I aree with you on some points, it isn't really necessary to give a reason on day 1, after that it should be, but on the first day there's almost nothing to work with, giving a so-called reason like LSST or random.org doesn't give us any more information than just posting a vote
 
marty99 said:
@Eternaly_Lost:While I agree with you on some points, it isn't really necessary to give a reason on day 1, after that it should be, but on the first day there's almost nothing to work with, giving a so-called reason like LSST or random.org doesn't give us any more information than just posting a vote
Click to expand...

I disagree on that it gives you nothing more.
A village throw away reason, will give us nothing more, however a wolf throwaway reasoning on day 1 will give us a little something when they are lynched and found to be a wolf. Not very much all, I will agree with that, but I would not call it nothing. I think it like going from 0% of nothing but the vote of information to 1%. There could be a lot more in it, but it a small tidbit of information.
 
Apologies for my current semi-absense. Yesterday I had a 38.9 degree fever, today is only slightly better. I am not really in much of a condition to play actively right now.

If replacing me is easy please do so, otherwise I'll try to be around enough to vote at least. With luck the fever should subside in a day or so.

(I'm not caught up on the thread yet, btw - will vote soon after I've figured out who the third voter was ;-) )
 
Eternaly_Lost said:
I am with Jonti-h on this, I don't care what the reason you give is for day 1, Random.org, LSST, Counter Vote, Continuing a bandwagon, Must survive, anything really, just at least give us something. Otherwise a wolf could hide in you lack of information. There are two a thing a wolf desires, a lack of information and incorrect information. Both are what allow them to hunt freely at night, and well it harder to find the incorrect information on day 1 (Everyone claims to be human, 1 person is most correct as he is the seer, the other 3 are flat out lying , those that don't even give us the most flimsiest of reasoning are all we have to work on.
Click to expand...

Indeed, nobody expects an essay for a first day vote but something *anything* is not too hard to bring in.

PHP: 
Vote Lemeard because he likes TIEs and it makes a TIE
Vote EUOOO7 because Yes. 
Vote Lord Strange because LSST

It just shows that you are there to be honest.

marty99 said:
@Eternaly_Lost:While I aree with you on some points, it isn't really necessary to give a reason on day 1, after that it should be, but on the first day there's almost nothing to work with, giving a so-called reason like LSST or random.org doesn't give us any more information than just posting a vote
Click to expand...

If it was anyone other than a serial 2 word voter then you'd be right - everyone does it sometimes - but when Yakman does it all the bleeding time, it wouldn't hurt him to at least put in an indication he is going to attempt to play this time.

Eternaly_Lost said:
I disagree on that it gives you nothing more.
A village throw away reason, will give us nothing more, however a wolf throwaway reasoning on day 1 will give us a little something when they are lynched and found to be a wolf. Not very much all, I will agree with that, but I would not call it nothing. I think it like going from 0% of nothing but the vote of information to 1%. There could be a lot more in it, but it a small tidbit of information.
Click to expand...

Indeed, when we get a varulv it can make for some interesting analysis. Some BS reasons for a vote can show up as wolfish under this light.
It's not enough to build a complete case, but it adds to the weight of evidence.

randakar said:
Apologies for my current semi-absense. Yesterday I had a 38.9 degree fever, today is only slightly better. I am not really in much of a condition to play actively right now.
Click to expand...

Feel better soon!
 
Zombie.png

If Zombie Thistle is going to be a candidate early and can't be subbed, it's probably best to get rid of him early. He's not going to be very active, or do any analysis whatsoever. He's just going to vote, likely stupidly. Zombie Thistle is thus going to be a drag on the village and a very easy late-game lynch. An inactive, brainless, lynchable villager is good for the wolves. Therefore, everyone should vote for Zombie Thistle today.

Unvote Euro
Vote Zombie Thistle

Anyone who doesn't vote to kill him today must be a wolf. And anyone who hunts Zombie Thistle must be a villager.
 

Vote Yakman


Third voter ;-)
Time for me to catch up on the rest of this.
 
Vote Yakman

To serve as an example for being a zombie that distracts the village too much, AND YES, DIFFERENT TARGETS TOMORROW.
 
Well, the thing about first day votes is that the beginning, there's really no point saying a reason. But as the day goes on and votes are cast, things start to happen, and some people may become more suspicious than others. Such as Yakman, whose vote switch to Thistletooth may or may not have been due to something said by Euro, and doesn't seem to make much sense. Or Thistletooth's self-vote just a moment ago, which for some reason no one cares about. And now, Randakar (but still, third voter? Really?) and Ciryandor and their push of Yakman into the lead, which if they hadn't justified it with something, would be a bit off.

But anyways,

Unvote Yakman
Vote Snoopdogg

Tt [4] - Tt [112] Yak [102] Euro [96] Snoop [85]
Yak [4] - Ciry [115] Rand [113] Jonti [83] Marty [79]
Lem [1] - Ls [91]
Snoop [4] - Jamie [116] Lem [100] Lost [93] Wal [92]
None [1] - Steed

You know why :cool:
 
Jamie you sly dog. :p
 
Jamie's like that, and yes, my vote on Yakman is part meta, part behavior. I honestly want villagers who serve as lightning rods for contention out of the way first. If people become WAY too attached to them, maybe it's a wolf sign... ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back