• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
If there is only one wolf in each pack then the number of packs would have to be insane. I have no idea what an appropriate number is for such a scenario but certainly 5 or 6 wolf packs is not impossible.

I'm not sure how or even if that would work though. Vote analysis is the number one tool us villagers have to figure out who the bad people in the informed minority are. If wolf packs consist of one person each then there is no such thing as an attempt to save a packmate since there are no packmates to save.. nor is there an informed minority.

Also, if all the wolf packs know who all the other wolves are wouldn't one of them just out the rest to get all of the competition lynched? Or would you get some kind of cold war type standoff where each individual could decide to launch the nukes but would not because of the risk of mutual extermination?

In such a scenario the village has an advantage I think - it gets to stand on the sidelines while all the wolves duke it out amongst each other ;-)
(It'd be a tad bewildering though ..)


Id say that there are 3 packs x 2 members.. To have multi packs with only 1 member would be pretty boring for the guys that hunt last. If that theory was correct, then 4 differant packs with 1 member would be max id say. Plus, how on earth do they reach plarity with the cave dwellers to win if only 1 member??
 
lalala.

Votecount coming.
 
Walrus -3- Randy, Jonti, Slinky,
Slinky -2- Lord_D, Walrus
Lord_D -3- Lemeard, Jamie, punk
Jonti -1- Steed,

Someone check me.
 
The cave... it rumbles... with the hunger of a thousand angry nuns! IT NEEDS DEATH TO APPEASE IT! QUICK! KILL SOMEONE!

And so you kill Lord_D and Walrus. The first tastes of chicken, so he must be human. Though why he wore that ridiculous costume and spoke in that odd accent must mean he was foreign. Probably New Zealand.

ANYWAY, the second kill is the most important. As it turns out, Walrus, the walrus of walrus-land, was a werewolf wolf of werewolfland! Which is important to note because as he was being eated by the cave, he was eating the chicken-tasting Lord_D.

Other than that, nothing eventful happened. Oh wait, yes, A large rock fell on walrus before he was eated.



Walrus Wolf of Wolf pack 2 is lynched

Lord_D Villager of Villager Village is lynched

No one is hunted at during the night
 
NOOOOOOoooooo... precious..
 
There's one wolf lynched from pack 1. One from pack 2. And one from pack 3. :rofl:

This doesnt tell us alot, which is a bummer!, just confirmed what we knew. Why couldnt Walrus be of wolf pack 5 or something!!!:mad::mad:

No kill tho... hmmm, was it walrus's hunt?? but he is pack 2?? unless didnt start at pack one, but a random dice throw from the cave goblin and his booming voice. Was somebody not on line today to issue the hunt order?? or do we have an Angel trapped in here with us..

My brain hurts with all the options.. DAMN YOU EURO.:(
 
Why couldnt Walrus be of wolf pack 5 or something!!!:mad::mad:

Just making your life difficult
trollface.png
 
Looks like there's at least a little merit to voting people who are not voting on wolves. So let's do it again, see what shakes loose.


Vote jamie
 
Looks like there's at least a little merit to voting people who are not voting on wolves. So let's do it again, see what shakes loose.


Vote jamie
I agree, especially since today he voted Lord_D and not walrus

Vote jamie550
 
I'd put myself forward according to Randakars reasoning. But I don't like that idea very much :eek:o


Vote Slinky instead.

You could supply us with alternate reasoning instead of course :)
 
Vote slinky

Will post reasoning later when I am not on the loo dealing with a hangover.
 
Vote Slinky

There are Randa, Jonti, Punk, Jamie, Steed, Slink, and Lem. From what I can see, Steed, Randakar, and Lemeard are providing, or attempting to provide, analysis, at least on the matter of role distribution. Because after all, it is hard to analyze when there are at least three packs, and each pack with only a few wolves (at most three, given equal distribution). What they argue does make sense, though I wonder if this isn't a case of using inside knowledge. Nevertheless, they would probably prove useful to keep around.

This leaves Jonti, Punkbob, Jamie, and Slinky. Jonti seems to be acting normally, though he is too good to read. Leaving only Punkbob, me (as usual :( ), and Slinky. Between Punkbob and Slinky, I'd rather have Punkbob happy, considering the current vote structure.

Jamie [2] - Slink [133] Randa [132]
Slink [3] - Jamie [137] Punk [136] Lem [134]
None [2] - Jonti Steed
 
Vote Jamie because TIE!
 
Vote slinky

Will post reasoning later when I am not on the loo dealing with a hangover.
Did you post this from the loo? :D

Also, ew.
 
Vote Jamie because TIE!

Hey, i wanted to make the TIE...:mad:

Jamie550 said:
Jamie [2] - Slink [133] Randa [132]
Slink [3] - Jamie [137] Punk [136] Lem [134]
None [2] - Jonti Steed

I dont remember voting for [NONE] ??..:confused: :p