• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Our current reach in the Far East, ten months into the war with the USSR.

HoI3_70_zpsnk5f69gf.png




Danger!
The Soviet Army, counting on their armor superiority, have launched a massive offensive operation around the city of Irkutsk. We were expecting an offensive but not in the scale of what is happening in the battlefield. The Soviets are pushing on all fronts, their armour spearheads have shattered our line at various points and many units have been forced to retreat. We have fallen back across the northern Mongolian border with the USSR. Many divisions are also retreating from the western Mongolian front. The massive retreat of forces across all fronts has created supply problems and administrative chaos. A lot of units have mixed with others from different Corps or even field Armies.



HoI3_81_zpsc8yqmkw9.png




Soviet troops charging up a hill in Mongolia.

soviet%20assault_zpsaaddvppy.jpg




A month later, our forces have been considerably pushed back from the Irkutsk front. This is a classic example of Soviet Deep Battle operations. The Red Army has pushed really fast in the center and plan to reach the capital Ulaanbaatar soon, our main strategic base and supply depot around this area of Asia. We thought our frontline was secure around Irkutsk but it appears that was a wrong perception. If Ulaanbaatar falls, our entire network of communications and supplies lines will be destroyed and our Armies left without viable means to conduct operations in this theatre. The nature of this critical situation oblige Us to devote all available military resources to the defense of Ulaanbaatar.

HoI3_92_zpsgmmmdhaj.png




Daring Soviet assault teams getting up close and disabling our tanks.
5ae02011e393291cb95889b40e1dcfd8_zpsywromywp.jpg





By the end of December, our troops kept on falling back across the steppes of Mongolia. We have ceded about half of the country to the Soviet winter offensive.

HoI3_72_zps3g1levlt.png




A Soviet tank batallion around a wooded area, perfect for cover.

soviet%20tank_zpsvpgsiijb.jpg




The importance of Ulaanbaatar for High Command is revealed by their willingness to send the entire air force to help the troops defending the mongolian capital.

HoI3_95_zpsahhnlvws.png




The Critical Zone 1st Corps, an infantry column, shall be sent to Mongolia to help the worn out troops there because it seems they might collapse soon if reinforcements are not sent.

HoI3_96_zpsbsh0whni.png




DISASTER!
The Soviet Winter offensive has finalized by the end of December. After reviewing our troops, we were shocked to learn the true extent of our defeat! Many infantry units were overrun and annihiliated by the Red Army. The power of Soviet armored divisions was devastating on our troops, never had we faced an enemy capable of this. Even their air forces were decent adversaries. We totally underestimated the capacity of the Communits to wage war. It appears they are not a second-rate military force after all.

To our terror, the Imperial Army of Manchuria has lost about 45,000 troops in this three month long Soviet offensive. The Imperial Army of Outer China has lost...130,000 soldiers out of 200,000!!! All in all, about a third of our initial forces in Russia have been wiped out in a single campaign by the USSR!

This is an national crisis! Most ministers have been forced to resign and the entire Army Chief of Staff of the Imperial General Headquarters has been replaced. The commander of Imperial Headquarters Russia has commited seppuku to regain his honor. The home press has reported the defeat and the population went hysterical. Many Imperial and governmental ediffices have been ransacked and burned. There was widespread rioting and looting in central Tokyo and the police have arrested about five thousand protesters, mostly young adults, elderly veterans and even women. Many suicides were also reported in the news, as some fanatics could not resist the shame of national defeat.


Imperial Officers interrogated after being captured by the Soviets.

captured%20jap%20officer_zpsirleaqzl.jpg

HoI3_97_zps3fb68xly.png



The Home 1st Corps returning from defeat with only two out of its five original divisions.
HoI3_98_zpsfcpks2vd.png


The Amphibious 3rd Corps has lost 4 out of 5 divisions. A real problem has surfaced in this theatre.

HoI3_99_zpsd0exaw9p.png




Soviet soldiers are photographed marching through Mongolia. We are shocked that these conscripts have been pushing us back. Its their firepower, not them.

soviet%20mnchu_zpsnc4ezn0l.jpg





Far East Army Group was made up of 400,000 troops when the invasion of Russia started. Today, its strength is about half of that. In total, out of approximately 600,000 troops sent to Russia, only about 400,000 are left today, the other 1/3 was wiped out in the Soviet winter offensive of 1939.

HoI3_102_zpsqhgww3jm.png





Shame of defeat! Our troops are seen surrendering their flags and Imperial banners to the victorious Red Army. Stalin must be satisfied.

jap%20lose_zpsxptftrjx.jpg



The Far East, thirteen months into the war. Note how our troops have fallen back in western Mongolia to reorganize new defense lines around Ulaanbaatar. The Soviet Winter offensive was really damaging, our biggest military defeat since the campaigns in Asia started. The two Armies of China are being rushed to this front to plug the gaps in numbers, reestablish the balance of power and prepare the initiative for further offensive campaigns.


HoI3_103_zpsgtsodx3o.png


Our war in China has been won easily, only Xibei and Tibet remain. The conflict in Russia, however, seems like it will last until 1945. With our massive losses in the Mongolian front, we have no option but to send the Armies of China there to make up for the loss of 200,000 soldiers. It is February of 1940. We are satisfied with the size of our conquest. However, we believe we could have achieved more in the war, especially in the Soviet front. Had we started the war with five anti-tank corps, instead of one, our lines would be much deeper or at least we wouldn't have lost half of Mongolia to the Red Army. Soviet armor has been a great problem for our lighter troops. Another drawback was that we only built two air bases when in reality the large size of the territory there and few airports in the Far East called for the production of more of these bases. There were a few battles where our air forces couldn't support our infantry and left them unprotected to enemy strafing and bombing, tanks and artillery barrages.

Our biggest mistake though, has been the inmense resources we have given to the Navy instead of the Army since 1938. By 1936, our land forces were about 500,000 strong. Three years later, on the eve of the Soviet invasion, this had grown to about 1 million troops, of which only 40,000 were anti-armor troops. For comparison, one (1) Super Heavy Battleship and nine (9) Aircraft Carriers and their respective CAGs (18?) are being built for the Navy. We knew a conflict with the USSR would be a land war by default. However, we felt very confident in the size and strength of our Army because they had come from an spectacular and lightning victory in China. This is the reason why we only gave the Army few production slots and just sent 600.000 soldiers to Russia and left 400,000 in China.

The reality on the ground in Russia was very different though. Soviet troops were highly motivated, organized and well armed. Their tanks had a devastating effect on our forces and the size and strength of the Red air force was also impressive. The size of the territory was inmense and the weather was harsh too, this had a massive psychological effect on the soldiers as it made them feel small and powerless. We could feel that the lands of Russia were basically swallowing division after division. To make matters worse, the poor infrastructure in the Far East broke our supply lines many times and some divisions were living on the day.

All of this won't stop our advance though. We will regroup our forces and hold the lines. We shall build five anti-tank corps, a few tactical bombers and air bases. Once the veteran and fanatical Armies of China reach Mongolia, we shall continue the offensive.

Until next time! In the next update, our war will be focused exclusively on Russia and shall include a small Field Marshall and Admiral ceremony for the commanders who have done well in conflict. We will also start to formulate strategic plans of war against the Allies and Americans.



Soviet-Japanese Border Wars (1932-1941)

The Soviet–Japanese border wars was a series of combats and skirmishes around Manchuria and Mongolia, without any formal declaration of war, between the Soviet Union and the Empire of Japan between 1932 and 1941. The Imperial Japanese army recorded 151 minor incidents on the border of Manchuria between 1932 and 1934. The number of incidents increased to over 150 per year in 1935 and 1936, and the scale of incidents became larger. About 100,000 casualties were the result of the conflict.

This political doctrine of the Empire of Japan was called Hokushin-ron and stated that Manchuria and Siberia were Japan's sphere of interest and that the potential value to Japan for economic and territorial expansion in those areas was greater than elsewhere. Its supporters were called the Strike North Group. It enjoyed wide support within the Imperial Army during the interwar years, but was abandoned in 1939 after military defeat on the Mongolian front at the Battle of Khalkhin gol. It was superseded by the diametrically-opposite rival policy, the "Southern Expansion Doctrine" (Nanshin-ron or Southern Road), which regarded Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands as Japan's political end economic sphere of influence and aimed to acquire the resources of European colonies while neutralising the threat of Western military forces in the Pacific.

1024px-Hokushin-ron-Map.svg.png


In 1939, Soviet and Imperial forces clashed in what would be called the Battle of Khalkhin Gol. The fighting lasted from May to September of 1939. An up and coming Soviet general named Zhukov was responsible for a combined arms assault involving around 600 fighters and bombers and 500 tanks in the last week of August. The offensive was devastating for the Japanese troops and they were destroyed. After this victory, the Soviets signed the Molotov-Ribentropp Pact on the 24th of August.The Japanese and the soviets signed a cease fire on the 15th of September. With the threat of a second front in the Far East gone, the Soviets concentrated in Europe and invaded Poland on the 17th of September. In 1941, they signed a non-aggression pact.



BONUS video from the defeat of our forces in Mongolia by the USSR:

 
Last edited:
  • 1
Reactions:
well, it seems you are now in a position to try and hole the Reds until more men and equipment can be send... you have the manpower and resources now... if only the IC...
 
  • 1
Reactions:
The only thing I could see doing is wasting IC on infra to build up supply lines via the Transiberian Railway, but that's wasted IC for Japan. Really, only the USA and USSR can afford such things.

I agree Kyrion. Japan's small industrial base does not allow for such luxuries. For every province road section we could build an entire division. It's a typical butter vs guns kinda dilemma. Supply is horrible in the Far East, got any other ideas?

Please don't let Germany go to war with the Soviets! That would ruin this interesting scenario.

It is an interesting scenario friend! However, I have no control over who declares war on whom. I am Japan. Whatever other countries choose, I shall adapt. Is there even any way to prevent a war between them that you know of?

I think that would be a sure fire way of letting the Soviets steamroll all over Japan!

lol yeah however we will build AT divisions to halt the beast soviet tanks.

I think it would be a surfire way of providing an interesting challenge!

yeah it will be a great challenge, the russians have about 500 divisions. We have about 150 I think lol

well, it seems you are now in a position to try and hole the Reds until more men and equipment can be send... you have the manpower and resources now... if only the IC...

exactly! we have a lot stockpiled but our IC is very small for a major. I wish someone could give us lend lease...

for now though, we will hold the lines and wait for the die hard veteran armies of China to arrive and help us mount a summer offensive for 1940.
 
It appears you have bitten off slightly more than you can chew in one go, attacing China and Russia at the same time. Perhaps now with the added forces from China and the addition of extra AT formations, things will go better. But do you now have enough resources to sustain a prolonged war with them, or will you need to take the DEI to keep your industry going? If the latter, things could get dicey.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
No, short of the creative application of cheats. It's your aar, obviously.

To be honest, I hope the nazis and communists don't go to war with each other as they will battle the Allies in many theatres and wear them down eventually. As Japan, thats more convenient in case I go to war with the Allies themselves in the not so distant future..

It appears you have bitten off slightly more than you can chew in one go, attacing China and Russia at the same time. Perhaps now with the added forces from China and the addition of extra AT formations, things will go better. But do you now have enough resources to sustain a prolonged war with them, or will you need to take the DEI to keep your industry going? If the latter, things could get dicey.

It appears so.

Had I sent those 400,000 veterans troops to Russia at the beginning of the campaign in Jan. 1939, things might be a bit different now in terms of the balance of power around the frontlines.

I think Im okay with the resources for the moment, with the exception of oil. We are at a low 18% capacity of crude oil. Fuel stocks are at 37%. As long as we can keep producing extra consumer goods and supplies and sell them to other countries such as the US, we can receive money to keep on importing oil from other nations. There is no reason at the moment to invade the DEI, yet. The war with the Soviets is putting a lot of pressure on our fragile export oriented economy. If we fight the Allies too right now, we could get crushed economically and from a resource point of view.

Maybe in 1943, we will invade the entire pacific and western asia in one rapid action to catch the Allies off guard.
 
Good job. But what now? Soviets would not surrender unless Leningrad, Stalingrad and Moscow fall. I doubt you can take them, so it is up to Germany... that just might happen if you draw and hold those Soviet divisions in Siberia.

If you do manage that for two or three solid years Germany ought to win. And while you are not in the same faction, ergo fighting a separate war against Soviet Union, there should be no problem with peace deal. If you are in the same war, sometimes Germany gets its share, others no. I have gone thru that with Italy -.-

You have good manpower base as Japan (and China), maybe you could try a mix of militia and anti-tank to hold some parts of your front (2-3 militia + 2 AT) as it's that Soviet tanks that push you around. It is an IC light solution if you need to hold the line, and they need less supply which is good as infrastructure is low. Soviets should not be able to supply a large armored army in Siberia for long. Logistic bombing of Trans-Siberian railway should do WONDERS, as it is the only supply line for Soviets in Siberia.

Also, consider investing in some infrastructure. It might not be cheap, but it will pay out later. And with those cheap Mil-AT divisions to support your line, you just might pull it off and hold until Germany comes knocking the rusty commie door down ;)

With your IC you could do that... if you ease on the Navy. Consider building only carriers if you must (they take time) and build CAGs later, when you prepare for the war with Allies.

So, lots of AT to hold ARM, regular INF with ART to hold some of the Soviet INF, bomb those trains to hell, build a few roads and railways yourself and wait for Germans :) Well, at least I would do that, this is over all your game :) I want to see how things in Siberia go (nice Soviet counter attack tho :$ ) and how will US react to a rising threat level. :D
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Very interesting and pleasant to follow.
I really like the way you go, i.e. building Mil/AT. That's the spirit !

Nevertheless, I have some serious doubts about a positive issue of this conflict. It seems most of your ressources will have to be diverted to the "russian" front. It's already a tough nut to crack but what if the USA decide to invite themselves to the party ?
Or do you expect Germany to finish the job for you ?
I'm curious about your long-term strategy (goals)...
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Good job. But what now? Soviets would not surrender unless Leningrad, Stalingrad and Moscow fall. I doubt you can take them, so it is up to Germany... that just might happen if you draw and hold those Soviet divisions in Siberia.

If you do manage that for two or three solid years Germany ought to win. And while you are not in the same faction, ergo fighting a separate war against Soviet Union, there should be no problem with peace deal. If you are in the same war, sometimes Germany gets its share, others no. I have gone thru that with Italy -.-

You have good manpower base as Japan (and China), maybe you could try a mix of militia and anti-tank to hold some parts of your front (2-3 militia + 2 AT) as it's that Soviet tanks that push you around. It is an IC light solution if you need to hold the line, and they need less supply which is good as infrastructure is low. Soviets should not be able to supply a large armored army in Siberia for long. Logistic bombing of Trans-Siberian railway should do WONDERS, as it is the only supply line for Soviets in Siberia.

Also, consider investing in some infrastructure. It might not be cheap, but it will pay out later. And with those cheap Mil-AT divisions to support your line, you just might pull it off and hold until Germany comes knocking the rusty commie door down ;)

With your IC you could do that... if you ease on the Navy. Consider building only carriers if you must (they take time) and build CAGs later, when you prepare for the war with Allies.

So, lots of AT to hold ARM, regular INF with ART to hold some of the Soviet INF, bomb those trains to hell, build a few roads and railways yourself and wait for Germans :) Well, at least I would do that, this is over all your game :) I want to see how things in Siberia go (nice Soviet counter attack tho :$ ) and how will US react to a rising threat level. :D

Thank you Vuko! Now what? that's a good question. We will try to push all the way to Siberia/Ural. We will hold our lines there and wait for the germans to attack them. If they don't attack them, we will just hold the lines and send our armies to conquer the Allied and American territories in Asia with the help of our mighty navy. We are building many AT corps, mixed with some infantry brigades. Militia sounds interesting but aren't they too soft for tanks?

Bombing the TRSSR really interests me. Where should I do logistic bombing in the trans siberian railway? Deep into their supply lines or close to the fronlines? Will TAC planes be okay to logistic bomb?

Also, a few more of those soviet counterattacks and I'm ruined in Asia. I can't believe they wiped out 1/3 of my army in Russia. That's insane for the AI, although Im playing Very Hard though. Feels great to face a strong adversary tbh.

Very interesting and pleasant to follow.
I really like the way you go, i.e. building Mil/AT. That's the spirit !

Nevertheless, I have some serious doubts about a positive issue of this conflict. It seems most of your ressources will have to be diverted to the "russian" front. It's already a tough nut to crack but what if the USA decide to invite themselves to the party ?
Or do you expect Germany to finish the job for you ?
I'm curious about your long-term strategy (goals)...

Thank you Nicegil!

I haven't yet committed to MIL / AT corps, yet. But it is a very interesting idea indeed. I wonder if mil with AT can stop a soviet armored division? I almost never use MIL, but when I do, they are usually as Anti partisan forces. I have more trust in regular infantry but it is true that my IC is small and also the infrastructure here is consuming way too many supplies and most troops are undersupplied, so I'll have to think about it seriously.

Those are my doubts too.

As of now, it is a reality that I invested way too much in the Navy while ignoring the Army for many years. This was a serious flaw in strategy. We should have thrown everything we have to the Soviet Front. On the other hand, I will have about 10 new carriers to face the Americans or Allies in the near future. Since about 90% of our Army is in the Soviet front, if the Americans declare war on us soon, we won't have any troops that we could assign to the Pacific theatre, save for some garrisons to guard our islands. But offensive landing operations will have to be postponed.

Our current strategy is based on anti-access/areal denial. To face the US we will use our Navy and Air Force to deny the americans entry to the western pacific. As long as they can't enter the WP or is very costly for them to do, we can win a war of attrition against the Americans. This will become the new naval frontlines. It will also protect the home islands from any kind of air attacks. We are confident it can work because we have a big navy and some naval bombers.

Do I expect Germany to help me? At first, I did. I based my strategy on it. But now, I don't think they will fight the commies at all. Both the nazis and communists are busy fighting the allied powers and it wouldn't make strategic sense for them to fight each other right now. On the other hand, the nazis and reds are wearing down the Allies and I can take advantage of this in Southeast Asia.

My long term goals are to conquer all of East Asia and Southeast Asia, Oceania, the Pacific islands, India and the Russian Far East. Build the empire Japan always wanted to. To achieve them, we have to follow this:

1. Defeat and annex all of China. Check
2. Fight USSR and drive to Siberia. In progress
3. Fight Allies and take their Asian/Oceania possesions. On hold
4. Fight Americans and take their pacific possesions, On hold.
5. Fight Axis if they defeat USSR. Depends on future outcome.

This is how far they got in real life. I plan to go a bit further :p

japaneseheldlandww2.gif
 
Militia sounds interesting but aren't they too soft for tanks?

Bombing the TRSSR really interests me. Where should I do logistic bombing in the trans siberian railway? Deep into their supply lines or close to the fronlines? Will TAC planes be okay to logistic bomb?

Also, a few more of those soviet counterattacks and I'm ruined in Asia. I can't believe they wiped out 1/3 of my army in Russia. That's insane for the AI, although Im playing Very Hard though. Feels great to face a strong adversary tbh.

1. Yes, they are soft. But let's face it, you have a long front, not enough IC, and ton of manpower. Militia offers itself as the only solution for a fast built AT force. Research additional division size, large front, people's army, ambush and those things. You can not defeat the Soviet armor without an armor of your own. Also, you can not outproduce them in terms of infantry and tanks. I get the idea that militia is bad, but look at your situation. You need some Japanese Volkssturm my friend :)

You have the manpower, just throw those soldiers at them... maybe that will stop them :D

2. As far as the railway goes, as far up the rails as you can reach. Supply branches like a tree at some point so it is important to hit it before that. If you get pushed back to Manchuria, I think Irkutsk would be the place to bomb. And if you have some bombers to spare, bomb the vulnerable positions of the front. Deny their front line troops the infrastructure to advance. You cond retreat and bomb your infrastructure (scorched earth doctrine) so enemy cannot follow you. If you get pushed back to Korea, just bomb those three four bottleneck provinces into 0 infrastructure. Enemy cannot advance.

TAC could do the job. STR is always better but TAC will do :)

To be honest with you, I think you didn't plan that invasion in detail, did you? :) If the focus of 1939-1942 was going to be Soviets Union, you should have invested in 4 engine aircraft, field a few STR and TRA groups. STR to bomb the logistics in front and back of the enemy, TRA to provide additional supply your People's army, and have two or three armor division to encircle a few soviet provinces at the time. Make an inverted bulge, let them in, bomb them while encircling, and destroy a few divisions at the time. Then push the line a province or two - repeat.

I mean, of you want to fight SOV with JAP... No matter how many INF+AT you produce, you are no match for their armor and mechanised forces. And as you cannot outproduce them, you must destroy their divisions one by one - not just to push them. You did good in Transamursk at the beginning, but there were almost no troops there. Now, you need to prove do you have what it takes to win. Hit them where they are the weakest - LOGISTICS! Those tanks and infantry use a lot of fuel and supply. Bomb theirs, use less yourself and you should be fine.

Banzai!
 
  • 6
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
interesting read!

didn't know people still played HOI3...

subbed!
Why wouldn't they? HOI4 isn't even released and people still play DH and AoD so it shouldn't be surprising.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Why wouldn't they? HOI4 isn't even released and people still play DH and AoD so it shouldn't be surprising.
yeah but DH doesn't feel like a broken and bugged out game. not that HOI3 doesn't have it's virtues, I've played about 600 hours of it. but i've not played it in years now and when i need some ww2 fun i still turn to DH.
 
yeah but DH doesn't feel like a broken and bugged out game. not that HOI3 doesn't have it's virtues, I've played about 600 hours of it. but i've not played it in years now and when i need some ww2 fun i still turn to DH.
I feel the same way. Nonetheless, my point is that if people still like the older versions then they'll obviously like the newer version as well. That's just how the game market works (excluding horrible, complete failures).
 
  • 1
Reactions:
yeah but DH doesn't feel like a broken and bugged out game. not that HOI3 doesn't have it's virtues, I've played about 600 hours of it. but i've not played it in years now and when i need some ww2 fun i still turn to DH.

Hoi3 isn't a broken and bugged out game, provided you are up to date with all the expansions.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Thank you for this very engaging AAR, Magnus. I am especially impressed with the pictures, where in the heck did you find them?

I agree with Vuko, going after the logistics is the way to slow the Sovs. But you have another alternative you might want to consider: being unaffiliated with a faction, you can sue for peace. Give that a try, if the Sovs accept it, you have time to rearm, reorganize and reflect. It's still early. If you hold off until the Germans attack the Sovs (or vice versa), you start with a stronger position when you reengage--you already hold Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, all of the Pacific ports and a chunk of Mongolia.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
1. Yes, they are soft. But let's face it, you have a long front, not enough IC, and ton of manpower. Militia offers itself as the only solution for a fast built AT force. Research additional division size, large front, people's army, ambush and those things. You can not defeat the Soviet armor without an armor of your own. Also, you can not outproduce them in terms of infantry and tanks. I get the idea that militia is bad, but look at your situation. You need some Japanese Volkssturm my friend :)

You have the manpower, just throw those soldiers at them... maybe that will stop them :D

2. As far as the railway goes, as far up the rails as you can reach. Supply branches like a tree at some point so it is important to hit it before that. If you get pushed back to Manchuria, I think Irkutsk would be the place to bomb. And if you have some bombers to spare, bomb the vulnerable positions of the front. Deny their front line troops the infrastructure to advance. You cond retreat and bomb your infrastructure (scorched earth doctrine) so enemy cannot follow you. If you get pushed back to Korea, just bomb those three four bottleneck provinces into 0 infrastructure. Enemy cannot advance.

TAC could do the job. STR is always better but TAC will do :)

To be honest with you, I think you didn't plan that invasion in detail, did you? :) If the focus of 1939-1942 was going to be Soviets Union, you should have invested in 4 engine aircraft, field a few STR and TRA groups. STR to bomb the logistics in front and back of the enemy, TRA to provide additional supply your People's army, and have two or three armor division to encircle a few soviet provinces at the time. Make an inverted bulge, let them in, bomb them while encircling, and destroy a few divisions at the time. Then push the line a province or two - repeat.

I mean, of you want to fight SOV with JAP... No matter how many INF+AT you produce, you are no match for their armor and mechanised forces. And as you cannot outproduce them, you must destroy their divisions one by one - not just to push them. You did good in Transamursk at the beginning, but there were almost no troops there. Now, you need to prove do you have what it takes to win. Hit them where they are the weakest - LOGISTICS! Those tanks and infantry use a lot of fuel and supply. Bomb theirs, use less yourself and you should be fine.

Banzai!

Vuko, thank you very much for these tips, I will surely used them on the campaign. You are kind of right, my strategy wasn't that technical to begin with. It reminds me of Barbarossa. I basically said, okay let invade Russia and encircle and defeat their army at the frontier and hope they surrender. It was an Operation based on dreams and illusions on our part. I totally understimated the USSR's power, just like Germany did once. I didn't even prepare winter gear, air bases or many anti-tank corps (I begun the invasion with just one!). My previous spectacular victory in China had boosted my confidence to sky high levels, so I was very arrogant when preparing the invasion. I thought that victory would come naturally because I always beat the game but I was wrong, very wrong. This same mindset probably gripped the german psyche after they beat the allies to a pulp in 1940 when launching Barbarossa. Overconfidence and hubris can really mess up the way you perceive the reality of situations in the battlefield, leading to massive and costly failures.

Wow, I should have known better being a hardcore VH HOI3 player. To be fair, this is like one of my first games with Japan and I also always play at VH, so a new experience is compounded by a higher level of difficulty, which in the ends makes for a new and unexpected game, which will make a great AAR, I guess.

Never had I faced the USSR, expect on the Eastern front in Europe. It was so much different then. In the Far East, some provinces allow me to advance about one province every few weeks or even months! The infra is broken here, literally. Most of my troops can't even get supplies to defend their lands. They have the org but not the supplies which makes them useless. What is helping a lot is the air force. They are supporting the ground troops across the entire front but even that's not enough to stop the russian steamroller.

Can I fight the war against the USSR just using AT or will I need tanks of my own (technology which I haven't even researched yet!)? Can a lot of AT save the day? I don't even have light tanks. Soviet Armor is the biggest problem and we need a miracle solution.


Great AAR. Subbed.

Thank you Cybvep, I will resume the AAR when I get some time to play soon.

interesting read!

didn't know people still played HOI3...

subbed!

Thanks Suaske! Will deliver more epic battles in the future, like the invasion of Oceania, DEI and India and the american and allied pacific bases. Maybe I will even go after the Panama Canal. Also, I think many are playing HOI3 because with HOI 4 coming in a long time, people are killing the hype by reliving old memories.

Thank you for this very engaging AAR, Magnus. I am especially impressed with the pictures, where in the heck did you find them?

I agree with Vuko, going after the logistics is the way to slow the Sovs. But you have another alternative you might want to consider: being unaffiliated with a faction, you can sue for peace. Give that a try, if the Sovs accept it, you have time to rearm, reorganize and reflect. It's still early. If you hold off until the Germans attack the Sovs (or vice versa), you start with a stronger position when you reengage--you already hold Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, all of the Pacific ports and a chunk of Mongolia.

I found them on Pinterest. Its really great for many diverse pictures that you can find in one place just by searching by tag. Lot of diversity of photos to choose from. I tried to make pictures go as historical as possible to go together with the AAR. Like when I invaded Beijing, I used real photos of the Japanese entering this city. Or the real pictures of the Russians and Mongolians fighting the Japanese during 1939 in the Border Wars.

I think Logistics will do it now. But about the peace, this is interesting. Do you think the USSR will accept a peace in which I keep some territorial gains? I would like to peace out with some new territory but I don't think they will accept it because they are very strong and huge. Maybe a white peace will do but I'm not ready to give up because it has cost me a lot of effort in terms of Manpower, IC and strategy. Also, I'm a huge empire, the third biggest after the British and Soviets, so I can't just quit the war and go home in defeat. I have to show the AI world why Japan deserves its place in the sun.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Vuko, thank you very much for these tips.

Can I fight the war against the USSR just using AT or will I need tanks of my own (technology which I haven't even researched yet!)? Can a lot of AT save the day? I don't even have light tanks. Soviet Armor is the biggest problem and we need a miracle solution.

You are welcome ;)

Can you fight them? No. You can hold them with it. Soviet infrastructure in the East is weak, and besides Trans-Siberian railway, there is little no none of it. That means that Soviets cannot sustain a large tank force (they use the most fuel and supplies). That is why you need to hold them there, and bomb their logistics. Once they are starved, you can attack, encircle and destroy them. Then, move west. It will be slow... very slow, but there is no other way. You cannot supply nor build a decent tank force to rival them so if you have a better idea, GREAT! Some master plan, cunning move... wunderwaffe? :)

Once you have gone far enough, you should consider bombing their industry in Central Siberia. When Germans attacked, Soviet Union moved most of its IC east of Ural mountains. So, destroying some of the Soviet tank force together with strategic bombing of IC that Germans cannot reach should help a lot in the downfall of Soviet Union. You can reach more than half of their Energy production, about a tenth of their Metal production (the rest is at the Ural mountains themselves so good luck if you can reach it), about half of the rares, and around 40-50 IC, while their core IC with German advance should be around 150. So, with that push, you could seriously endanger Soviet Union.

But first thing's first. You need to stop them - that is the hard part :) You have made a lot of mistakes, so it is gonna be fun watching you try it. Right now, infrastructure and AT construction would be my move. As well as retreating to Manchurian mountains closer to ports and supplies. And bomb the heck out of soviet logistics and tanks. They lack a lot of air bases that far east, so I would not worry about Red Airforce, as bombers have longer range.

If you chose to invest in tanks, invest in TD, not armor or light armor. It shares AT techs, provides great defense and lowers softness more than armor. And defense is what you need. Attack should be done when, and only when Soviet Army is starved of supplies and properly bombed. Encircle, shatter, consolidate lines, repeat.

You should think about releasing puppets in China. Those territories are not your core, and they are an oversea territory, so you get next to none IC and manpower. I think that penalty is -75% or more. On the other hand, Nationalist puppet government (as was the plan for Japan, not actual occupation) has full benefit of IC, and can supply some troops to strike into Mongolia and tie down some Soviet troops. Would have been better if you made them puppet in the first place, as they would keep their army, instead of the need to make a new one from scratch.

Now, I am sorry, I feel like I am telling you how to play your own game. I am just saying what I would have done. Please continue how you think is the best, as it is what makes a good and fun AAR. The best of luck mate! ;)
 
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
Fighting Soviet tanks as Japan is a tough situation.You have to make the most of terrain and unit experience to gain an edge. Comparing it to a recent Italy game in which I deployed large mountaineer formations with AT in the Caucasus, attacking from Turkey. The Soviets came at me with arm (which I can pierce) and Harm (which I can't).

I drove them into the mountains however and when ushing became too tough for awhile I dug in. Eventually they started counterattacking. Against dug in mountaineers with very high experience from previous campaigns and backed up by AT and engineers. Combining that with the terrain bonus mountaineers get in mountains and the horrific penalties tanks get in the same environment with Soviet stubbornness and they broke themselves on my wall, allowing my forces to counterattack.

Slow advance? yes. Costly? certainly, you will lose many thousands of troops. But it works better than facing a tank army in the open Manchurian or Siberian fields, thats for sure.
 
  • 1
Reactions: