Because I was not, and am still not, sure if I trust Panzer or Falc. Your approval despite not being on the team does little to assure me that team was a good one.@aedan777, I'd like to know why you rejected the team.
Because I was not, and am still not, sure if I trust Panzer or Falc. Your approval despite not being on the team does little to assure me that team was a good one.@aedan777, I'd like to know why you rejected the team.
Well, obviously if you're resistance you know Jerman is a spy, but why are you so sure about Tamius again?
Because I was not, and am still not, sure if I trust Panzer or Falc. Your approval despite not being on the team does little to assure me that team was a good one.
Why are you so confident that the last team was pure resistance? Tamius hasn't done anything to make him a likely spy (well he's done just about nothing period, so hardly means anything), and Panzer has nothing to suggest he's a likely resistance member. Falc was on the first team and it went without sabotage, but he's something of a more cautious player, so that isn't a firm point in his favour.Well someone has to, we need 5 votes to approve a 4-man mission. I am the one Resistance player left out. As I pointed out the following proposals are going to be highly rejectable. In fact, I can already tell you that I will be going for your proposal (and my own ofc), unless something unexpected happens.
Why are you so confident that the last team was pure resistance? Tamius hasn't done anything to make him a likely spy (well he's done just about nothing period, so hardly means anything), and Panzer has nothing to suggest he's a likely resistance member. Falc was on the first team and it went without sabotage, but he's something of a more cautious player, so that isn't a firm point in his favour.
I could imagine is he were a Spy he would have tried framing Jacksonian, as Jacksonian seems to be our best asset right now. I'm kinda sticking with the theory, it's either both Falc and Jacksonian spies, or both are not.
Me me me