You're not even trying to logically counter my points, nor have you ever done so. Just throw out accusation of tunneling, and trying to misconstrue the arguments. This is what a wolf does.
Also you're insinuating that I'm a villager with your posts today, when if you were a villager, you'd more likely be accusing me of being a wolf, since 50% of players who aren't you are a wolf, and a player is more likely to see someone voting for them, who they know is a villager, as a potential wolf than a potential villager. If you are a wolf on the other hand, you know I'm a villager, and fear that accusing me would only embolden me, so you try a tactic of approaching me as a fellow villager, trying to establish trust by offering it first. Classic wolf move.
At this point, you may well be a wolf, because this really isn't the mark of competent aedan I've known in WW games. I can't recall you ever tunneling before, and you're normally fairly quick to discourage similar play.
Furthermore, you're also the sort of player, in my (albeit relatively limited) experience, that would give a player the benefit of the doubt if they held their hands up and apologised for a stupid vote/accusation - such as I did earlier in this game. This time you are not letting it drop.
As for 'knowing' you're a villager, show me where I said that.
Anyway:
That being said, JCan and Arkasas fit together as packmates, since Arkasas avoided voting JCan on day two when he was in danger, and just voted Luft on both other days. Day 3 in particular it was a weak reason, invoking self preservation when he had a single vote on him. I would greatly prefer a JCan lynch today, but if I had to choose a second candidate to lynch, it'd probably be Arkasas.
Arkasas could well be a wolf, particularly due to his votes on Luft. I would not be opposed to his lynching at all. To say he 'avoided voting me' is a stretch though. He put a vote on ramius, not exactly a late one either really, and left it there.
Actually, I'm going to insist on a JCan lynch today, the day 2 count is simply too compelling to leave it otherwise. Ramius, Jcan, and JPR would the main three candidates. If we assume all three are villagers, then it would be logical to follow that the wolves would not be overly concerned about the outcome of the lynch. At least one wolf would be likely to vote someone else in such circumstances. Yet only three players didn't vote for the three main candidates, and all of them are now confirmed to be villagers. All of the wolves felt compelled to vote for the main candidates, that is weird. Unless we presume one of their number was threatened. With the seer dead, wolves are much less concerned with openly defending each other, since they can't be scanned. A four player voting bloc with no JL threat is a potent force, and wolves may think they can openly work in such circumstances. JCan being a wolf under threat is the only possibility I see to explain all the wolves voting for the main candidates on day 2. If all were villagers, all the wolves were doing was guaranteeing they'd look suspicious once it was known they were voting villagers. It was a save attempt, I'm almost sure of it.
Vote JCan
I see the events at deadline on day 2 as wolves attempting to tie up more than one villager. I know I'm a villager, and ram was a villager. Thus, the wolves weren't trying to rescue me at all by switching around.
Thus, I would look towards he who was in the running, but dropped out of contention before the end, i.e. jpr
Vote jpr
I realise the chaos and eventual count of day 2 makes my position look bad. It's hard for me to argue against that.
All I can do now is warn you, aedan, that if I'm run up and lynched, logically it will be you next.
