You know what, that's fair. I accept that.
That being said, you voting a throwaway with a half hour to go also seems odd, so I'll call that a wash.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You know what, that's fair. I accept that.
That being said, you voting a throwaway with a half hour to go also seems odd, so I'll call that a wash.
Well I don't exactly buy the Arky case and I'm not too enthralled at the idea of going for CAWZ right about now in the game so I'd rather put my vote to somewhere worthwhile instead of putting a vote on a crappy case.
30 minutes:
Arkasas, 5; Jcan (jpr 617-->634), Canadian_95_RTS (636), Euroo7 (De Chat 607-->639), F72Voyager* (642), Arkasas (650),
jpr123, 2; Sleepyhead (598), De Chatillon (641),
Sleepyhead, 1; LatinKaiser (Jpr 600-->610),
F72Voyager, 1; Jacksonian Missionary (De Chat 606-->Unv 629-->659)
Non-voters, 2; jpr123* (), Wagonlitz (),
Arkasas, 5; Jcan (jpr 617-->634), Canadian_95_RTS (636), Euroo7 (De Chat 607-->639), F72Voyager* (642), Arkasas (650),
jpr123, 2; Sleepyhead (598), De Chatillon (641),
Sleepyhead, 1; LatinKaiser (Jpr 600-->610),
F72Voyager, 1; Jacksonian Missionary (De Chat 606-->Unv 629-->659)
Non-voters, 2; jpr123* (), Wagonlitz (),
I've been busy.
I don't really know about these cases. As mentioned earlier we shouldn't go for CAWZ and as far as I can see the jpr case is solely CAWZ. Arkasas has acted strange and I'm not certain I believe his SA claim. SA is normally a baddie trait, though SA villagers do exist from time to time. But it is a really easy trait to claim and something baddies often claim. So that makes him look shady.
Also we should be vary about a TIE, since that might bring about parity if the purples indeed are extinct.
Vote Arkasas
13 minutes, last count before deadline:
Arkasas, 5; Canadian_95_RTS (636), Euroo7 (De Chat 607-->639), F72Voyager* (642), Arkasas (650), Wagonlitz (666),
jpr123, 3; Sleepyhead (598), De Chatillon (641), Jcan (jpr 617-->Ark 634-->665),
Sleepyhead, 1; LatinKaiser (Jpr 600-->610),
F72Voyager, 1; Jacksonian Missionary (De Chat 606-->Unv 629-->659)
Non-voters, 1; jpr123* (),
Arkasas, 5; Canadian_95_RTS (636), Euroo7 (De Chat 607-->639), F72Voyager* (642), Arkasas (650), Wagonlitz (666),
jpr123, 3; Sleepyhead (598), De Chatillon (641), Jcan (jpr 617-->Ark 634-->665),
Sleepyhead, 1; LatinKaiser (Jpr 600-->610),
F72Voyager, 1; Jacksonian Missionary (De Chat 606-->Unv 629-->659)
Non-voters, 1; jpr123* (),
.png){kind=avatar}
That's anot a TIE due to JCan'.s switch.
Also please nobody be stupid enough to make a TIE.
Also please nobody be stupid enough to make a TIE.
Alright, your funeral. Watch as k-59 says I'm a SA villager.
Arkasas, 5; Canadian_95_RTS (636), Euroo7 (De Chat 607-->639), F72Voyager* (642), Wagonlitz (666), Jcan (jpr 617-->Ark 634-->jpr 665-->671),
jpr123, 3; Sleepyhead (598), De Chatillon (641), Arkasas (Ark 650-->672),
Sleepyhead, 1; LatinKaiser (Jpr 600-->610),
F72Voyager, 1; Jacksonian Missionary (De Chat 606-->Unv 629-->659)
Non-voters, 1; jpr123* (),
No, because as laid out earlier in the day a TIE is not in the village's interests, since we might be really close to parity if both packs started with a cultist and assuming johho's golden rule.
And again as far as I can see the case on jpr is solely cawz---and cawz is not in the village's interests this close to parity.
tbf, it's not solely CAWZ - he's one of three that hadn't voted for, or been voted by baddies (pre-outing).