Probably the most absurd part of Euro's "case" against me is that it is equally applicable against himself. Euro says a smart wolf would hunt Hax, but then that means he knows the smart move would be to hunt hax, ergo he would also be a smart wolf who could have made the hunt. It's a silly case either way, but anyone following it should rethink their votes on me based on the above.
Regardless of how Euro puts his reasoning, any voting strategy that targets the village at lynching smart players is exceedingly likely to be bad for the village if and when it backfires and kills villagers. I'm not saying players considered smart or good should be above the lynch, but lynching them because they are smart or good is not a helpful strategy for the village, except by wild chance.
Anyways I'm not a wolf (or due to the RP I guess I am, that was a confusing PM to get when I skipped reading the RP roles), so lynching me is a bad idea. Yesterday wasn't overly helpful in giving us actual information to go on though, and anyone reading much into who voted the seer is being silly, since no one, villagers or wolves, knew he was the seer. Most that can be said is that Audren rose above Health and Alynkio is the votes, so maybe there was something of a save attempt. Claude was one of the late Audren voters, giving his vote right before deadline with no explanation, and hasn't been on since to give any later explanation or add other commentary. Not good for a case, but I'd like to pressure some activity out of him.
Vote Claude