Shame. But please, next time just let things stand. Slip-ups happen (and this game seems to have had a few)
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
That's a pity 
Game was getting really interesting after last day.
OTOH, people can now join Panzer's lite
Game was getting really interesting after last day. OTOH, people can now join Panzer's lite
Most slipups I have seen (this game or in the past) involved equal knowledge. Everyone would have/see the same info.
If the wolves would have acted on the slip-up, it would immediately unbalance the game, acting on knowledge they should not have, resulting in other players going to analyze what happened while they would not have info (which usually is kind of the point of this game, except that players do not assume there would be meta-info involved).
That's why I could not let it stand.
So Euro was the last wolf. Still think getting a curse was the better pickup, though.
This. It was a really fun game.
There has been slipups in the past which only a few knew about as opposed to the entire game. For instance Euro once revealed mates through accidentally CCing mates instead of BCCing them. Such things are part of the game.
Plus johho was at the top of the hunt list. And so was randy. So they might well have gone soon anyway.
Damn, it's late and I'm trying to explain this after what happened this evening.
At first there were not even wolves involved. Only villagers and a scanner and his apprentice.
The reason I didn't let it stand was that I thought by removing the player and replacing the role to another player (combined with a subbing, so the old player had no activity, and the new player not being aware), I could actually correct this without anyone ever noticing. (only the apprentice was taken up into the "plot", and he performed the role admirably)
Only thing I forgot. One of the players was cursed. And the moment he got in a wolf pack, it went wrong. I should have changed the cursed to another player, then it would have worked.
At first there were not even wolves involved. Only villagers and a scanner and his apprentice.
The reason I didn't let it stand was that I thought by removing the player and replacing the role to another player (combined with a subbing, so the old player had no activity, and the new player not being aware), I could actually correct this without anyone ever noticing. (only the apprentice was taken up into the "plot", and he performed the role admirably)
Only thing I forgot. One of the players was cursed. And the moment he got in a wolf pack, it went wrong. I should have changed the cursed to another player, then it would have worked.
No. The second seer and priest was dead then randy would have been decried sorc app. (Assuming Jackson was sorc and not seer like we thought.)
In my opinion the right thing would have been to not do anything. Sure, that might have made a semi JL of the people in that PM, but it'd also have meant a risk for the scanner once somebody turned/if somebody was a wolf.
Wolves hunting the Seer on Night 0 unbalances the game, but it can still happen. A good setup gives the possibility to work around that and keep the game going.
And to be honest, that thought of mine had already occurred to me when you removed him from the game instead of autolynching him (didn't mention it because you requested that we do not meta into it). It is true that I then had access to extra info to be pretty sure that was the case, but it's not like I could be the only one reaching that conclusion (which is also why changing the cursed would not solve things).
Plus, if you autolynched him, everyone would have practically the same information. Though... did he actually break any rules?
Very sad to hear. Despite not liking to play as a vanilla villager I thought this setup was really interesting and it was fun even watching it. But yeah, slipups happen. Don't feel too bad Rysz.
No, Euro is no wolf.
I did not know that. It also depends ofcourse at what point in the game. When you're 10 days in, you don't really want to end it because of a mistake. And in this case it was a scanner, AND his apprentice in a game without protection...
yeah, but that are hunts only with game-info to be analyzed. The point is: You can't analyze info you don't know that's actually part of the equation. if I would give you a riddle about cars, where the solution involves a train, you don't expect there is a train involved. So you'll never figure it out.
Also not really sure what you wanted to do with that PM urging us not to discuss it. Since even if we didn't discuss it would that then mean we couldn't hunt randy? As there's no way I wouldn't hunt randy first chance after seeing that. Or johho who was semi cleared.
Can you just reveal all the details and the player set up please? The game's clearly over at this point and this half-information about why the game had to end is really confusing.
Still wrong.
Ofcourse, but then there would still be the apprentice. Here the apprentice was involved too.
But the info you then had, was the very same info everyone else had. And as no-one would talk about it, it would not affect things.
Yes, everyone would know his role. And 4 other players would know for certain the role of his (former) apprentice.
Btw how well were I doing this game? Had I for once managed to not be too obvious as a wolf?
This is exactly why I asked you not to further discuss it. You had only the second-hand info. And the conclusions you draw are still wrong. But at that point it was already actually too late.
That's a pity
OTOH, people can now join Panzer's lite
True! Silver lining. Click here everyone. It's basically the same but smaller. Same deadline and all.
You were seer scanned day 4, IIRC your insistance on tying people when we were lynching blind on day 1 was the reason for the scan.
Now that we're asking how well we were playing: did anyone notice me doing stupid stuff for a seer's apprentice(or stupid stuff in general)?