-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Is that an alibi vote?
@Wagonlitz @beartjah as royal village numerologists or mathematicians, please consider the possibility that my vote on Arkasas spurred a panic vote by aedan who was subsequently alibi voted by Claude LC. Have a go at that in your models.
Meanwhile:
unvote Arkasas
Vote Ike
For complete zombifying.
Quick unofficial vote count
Audren - 2
Beartjah[50]
Chieron[59]
comm cody - 1
alxeu[56]
ike- 1
cliges[arkasas 57 -> 64]
alxeu - 1
wagon[58]
beartjah - 1
audren[60]
claude - 1
dedonus[61]
cliges - 1
aedan[62]
aedan - 1
claude[63]
not voted - 7?
Audren - 2
Beartjah[50]
Chieron[59]
comm cody - 1
alxeu[56]
ike- 1
cliges[arkasas 57 -> 64]
alxeu - 1
wagon[58]
beartjah - 1
audren[60]
claude - 1
dedonus[61]
cliges - 1
aedan[62]
aedan - 1
claude[63]
not voted - 7?
.png){kind=avatar}
This is Cliges when he's imitating EURO. It's a thing.
Hey, nobody's voting you, right?
vote beartjah
we should kill zombies.
Vote Ike.
now watch me fucking sleep through the deadline because time is a flat circle and we live in hell.
Vote Ike.
now watch me fucking sleep through the deadline because time is a flat circle and we live in hell.
So this is what I wake up to...
Quick vote count.
Audren - 2
Beartjah[50]
Chieron[59]
comm cody - 2
alxeu[56]
Yvanoff[72]
ike- 2
cliges[arkasas 57 -> 64]
Comm Cody[70]
alxeu - 2
wagon[58]
the_hdk[71]
beartjah - 2
audren[60]
Arkasas[69]
claude - 2
dedonus[61]
ramius3443[67]
cliges - 1
aedan[62]
aedan - 1
claude[63]
not voted - 2
Quick vote count.
Audren - 2
Beartjah[50]
Chieron[59]
comm cody - 2
alxeu[56]
Yvanoff[72]
ike- 2
cliges[arkasas 57 -> 64]
Comm Cody[70]
alxeu - 2
wagon[58]
the_hdk[71]
beartjah - 2
audren[60]
Arkasas[69]
claude - 2
dedonus[61]
ramius3443[67]
cliges - 1
aedan[62]
aedan - 1
claude[63]
not voted - 2
Unvote Audren
Vote Claude
Consolidation, we dont need quite this many people in the tie.
Vote Claude
Consolidation, we dont need quite this many people in the tie.
I don't know if I am reading too much into this for a day 1 vote, but I find it a bit interesting that Audren was the only person with 2 votes to start. Then five different people each got tied with him. Clearly at least some of them have to be villagers as we don't have that many wolves, but something about it feel like someone trying to find out which way the village will slide away from Audren in the all the smoke.
Vote Audren
He was the first to 2 votes, and it more likely with the mass of ties that follows that someone was looking for an excuse to protect him.
Vote Audren
He was the first to 2 votes, and it more likely with the mass of ties that follows that someone was looking for an excuse to protect him.
I thikn you're reading too much into it.
Now, the TIE could have been broadened to save somebody, but that somebody needn't be Audren, but could just as well be the second or the third person in the TIE. It's normal to create a twoway or a threeway on day 1.
Also, wolves might also just try creating a mass TIE for the fun of it, as it can lead to people going after the first poeple in it and also generally obfuscates things.
As mass TIEs really really aren't desirable for the village, due to how they make things opaque and easily allows wolves to slip out of the noose, then the people making the TIE the largest should get some scrutiny.
Yvanoff was the person to enlarge it to its largest, so as such.
Unvote Alexu
Vote Yvanoff
.png){kind=avatar}
