• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Niv certainly has earned his nickname well, all that's left now is to rebuilld everything that was lost, and maybe begin allying with other neighbors against whoever threatens the realm. I love that Bulgarian territory in Anatolia by the way, I'm curious as to what is currently going on with the world. Would love to see what it currently looks like.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
An absorbing write-up of what I can only imagine was a knife-edge session of gameplay! Good stuff, Tommy. And as ever, I love the weaving in of little details like the Cuman politicking.

Assyria is undoubtedly bloodied and bruised, but the bones of a powerful state remain. And now with sea access on both sides, it looks like the kingdom may be drawn more frequently into affairs in the west over the coming decades. Excited to see whether Niv can hold together what he has already worked so hard to gain.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
That was a chaotic era. Niv is now king, but I don't think the underlying problem is solved. Many Muslims remain in Assyria, and the Messalians will remain a threat - and the new regime is too dependent on the Cumans.

Let's see how Niv does.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The Spice Coast 1291-1301
The Spice Coast 1291-1301

1656855218880.png

The creation of the Raj of Malabar by the St Thomas Crusade in the 1210s was among the most incredible feats of the Assyrians Kings. Over the course of the thirteenth century this realm emerged as a semi-independent Christian state, nominally loyal to Nineveh but always mostly autonomous, amid a sea of Hindu powers. Despite constant pressure from its neighbours, it held firm to defend its territories for decades, offering a safe haven to India’s Christian minority and growing fabulously wealthy at the heart of Indian Ocean trade.

The plague arrived somewhat earlier in Malabar than it did in the Middle East, hitting the area at the very end of the 1260s. As India emerged of the pandemic, it found itself effectively severed from the mother country as Assyria descended into two decades of anarchy, cutting the territory off from what little support it had received in the past. Unfortunately for Malabar, its Hindu neighbours had not been similarly weakened, and in 1273 the resurgent Chola Empire invaded alongside her allies.

1656855293171.png

In the ensuing Malabar War, the Christians were led by a tragic hero in the form of Raj Joseph Vatterassil. Seeing the vast numerical superiority of his enemies, the Raja sought to fight the war on sea – where Malabar’s strong fleet would be of great use. Fortifying his key cities, Joseph terrorised the shores of southern India, effectively halted the maritime trade route between the Far East and western Asia – exacerbating the weak economic recovery of the post-plague era – and even for a time occupied much of the island of Sri Lanka. However, the Malabaris were forced to fall back to their home territories as it appeared that Calicut, their greatest city, would soon fall. Raj Joseph met the Tamils in battle near his capital in 1279 and, in a bloody stalemate, forced them to withdraw from their siege of the city.

Unfortunately, this victory merely delayed the inevitable. Cities across the Malabar coast had already begun to fall, and soon the Tamils had regrouped and returned to Calicut. Unable to defend the city in the long term, Joseph attempted to withdraw to the safety of the Maldives. However, in the intervening years his enemies had embarked on their own campaign of naval expansion and met his ships in the Laccadive Sea to the south of the Indian mainland and delivered a blow from which there would be no recovery. In 1283, the defeated Raja fled his homeland – never to return. After more than six decades, Christian Malabar was no more. Joseph himself made his way to Basra, arriving in Assyria in the midst of its brutal civil war – and aligned himself with King Niv, offering his services and those of his few remaining retainers in defeating his internal enemies and restoring order to Assyria.

1656855322403.png

The decades after the plague were ones of destabilisation, change and collapse throughout much of Eurasia. In the Byzantine Empire, they preceding the formation of the Paulician reform movement – that sought to overthrow the old Eastern Orthodox hierarchy and pursue a return a purer religion modelled on the Church of Paul the Apostle. More immediately, they sent the mighty Seljuk Empire spiralling catastrophic internal conflict. In this, the Turks’ experience shared many parallels with Assyria – with new religious movements, minority currents, steppe elements and regional lords all playing a role in pulling the country apart. Yet, there was to be no Seljuk Niv, and their once powerful empire splintered into dozens of distinct polities over the course of the 1280s and 1290s.

The collapse of one of their greatest geopolitical rivals presented Assyria with the opportunity to establish itself as the leading power in the Middle East. Seeking to take advantage of this moment, the Assyrians launched an invasion of the Persian Gulf in 1294, a region that was still home to a number of Nestorian Christian tribes. Although Niv successfully occupied most of the region, the rise of a new self-declared Sunni Caliphate from the deserts of western Oman forced the Assyrians into retreat. By the time a truce had been agreed in 1297, Assyrian gains had been limited to Kuwait.

1656855343961.png

As the century drew towards its close, the question of dynastic succession in Acre became increasingly important, where King Niv was set to take over from his ageing mother once her health finally failed. Although the stature of the Crown of Jerusalem had declined a great deal from its height, the title was nonetheless of clear spiritual and symbolic importance. The Papacy was firmly of the view that the title should not fall into the hands of a heretical ruler. The Catholics hoped to use this crisis as an opportunity – bringing the Church of the East into full communion with Rome and taking forward an ongoing Catholic ambition to heal the old religious divisions within Christendom and forge a truly universal Church. Niv, having been raised in Catholic surroundings in Acre and influenced by his close relationship with his Catholic Cuman allies, was open to this idea and facilitated the opening of negotiations between Catholic legates and the Eastern Patriarchate.

These negotiations would come to naught. The prestige of the Patriarchate had grown during the decades of crisis that followed the plague for its harsh line against the Messalians and the part it had played in restore social peace after the civil wars. The Patriarch therefore felt bold enough to stand against the monarchy – refusing to countenance any dilution of Nestorian doctrine nor accept the superiority in rank of the Pope in Rome. There would be no ecclesiastical union.

1656855359845.png

Instead, when Cecilia passed away in 1301, Niv marched into Acre at the head of army in order to enforce his claim to Jerusalem’s crown, the ruler of a Nestorian realm. With the Pope denouncing Niv’s ascension, the Holy Roman Emperor Dietrich, who ruled the city of Jerusalem and much of the Palestinian coast, swore to take up the cross and lead a Crusade to expel the heretics from the Holy Land and restore a Catholic Kingdom of Jerusalem under his own leadership. He would be joined by a large alliance of small independent Latin lords in the region who feared for their independence and faith following the push of the Assyrians into the region. The Palestinian Wars had started.
 
  • 9Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
The sad end to the Malabar Raj! So long as Assyria was a united realm, the local Indian powers were largely dissuaded from attacking. But when we became so weak there was no prospect of us sending aid to the east during that long civil war, they pounced and destroyed our Indian foothold.


Niv II seems like quite a brilliant ruler. Let's see what else he has up his sleeves...

He has made a tremendous start to his reign. The coming conflict with the west could well define his legacy just as much as his actions in the civil war!

The hard revolt setting explains a lot. The isolated landlocked exclaves just beg to be captured (and the AI ignores the easy pickings). Tabitha is a very sad chapter, if Niv had been Messalian, he could have made a divine marriage. Thank you, fearless leader, onwards to Jerusalem.

I find the hard revolt setting makes the game that bit more pleasantly chaotic. It helps dampen AI blobbing - especially into regions of the wrong religion/culture and makes it a lot harder for the player. Things can really spiral if s few events start to go wrong. A 50k peasant revolt is one thing when you have your armies at full strength - quite another when you are already scraping the manpower barrell and are out of cash.

A rip-roaring update! Must have been very entertaining and a good challenge to play.

Oh, I do hope this scorpion gets his just and grisly desserts.

The second army, even though still just a horde of lightly armed peasants, was just too huge in the end. Too many orcs.

Well done, Aragorn! The Army of the Dead shall sweep all before it! :D

On to Mordor!

A good thing too! Something involving molten lead and a funnel would have quite in order.

Phew! Victory, jaws of defeat, etc.

Very clearly!

Exciting stuff.

Nicely incorporated. Was any oath actually ever broken by Cumans past?

Nicely done. Plaudits to the Patriarch.

I'm glad you enjoyed this one. It's rare the game produces the conflicts where it is genuinely on a knife edge for such an extended period of time, so I hope we got some of that see-sawing drama here.

Shameless LoTR reference well spotted! :D

As for oath breaking Cumans - unpaid mercenaries was the in game inspiration, but something slightly less dramatic than the story equivalent.

If Niv does inherit Jerusalem, do we see an Assyrian Levant? Of course, as alluded to, this would only exacerbate tensions with the Catholics, and with the Cumans as powerful as they are, some settlement will have to be reached...

This will be the big question in the coming updates. There has been no communion with Rome, so we are now in direct confrontation with the Catholic world. These Palestinian Wars are going to be a long and bloody affair - and as you highlighted, the Catholic Cumans might not be best pleased fighting on the Nestorian side of a civilisational religious conflict.

Niv certainly has earned his nickname well, all that's left now is to rebuilld everything that was lost, and maybe begin allying with other neighbors against whoever threatens the realm. I love that Bulgarian territory in Anatolia by the way, I'm curious as to what is currently going on with the world. Would love to see what it currently looks like.

We have had a little bit more of a glimpse at some of our near abroad in this most recent update. I will give a more thorough picture of the rest of the world when we get to the end of the CK2 stage here.

An absorbing write-up of what I can only imagine was a knife-edge session of gameplay! Good stuff, Tommy. And as ever, I love the weaving in of little details like the Cuman politicking.

Assyria is undoubtedly bloodied and bruised, but the bones of a powerful state remain. And now with sea access on both sides, it looks like the kingdom may be drawn more frequently into affairs in the west over the coming decades. Excited to see whether Niv can hold together what he has already worked so hard to gain.

The Cuman politicking is certainly not at an end either just yet. Marching on the Catholic-ruled Holy Land with an independent-minded gang of soldiers with split loyalties between yourself and your enemies is a risky manoeuvre at the best of times. Niv will best hope his personal relationships he has built with him will stand strong, and that he can keep their pockets well lined.

As for Assyria, if we can hold on to and even consolidate the Jerusalem inheritance, then a position of dominance in the Levant will really be within our grasp. There are some very big obstacles to achieving that sitting in our way though.

Well done Niv, Assyria rise again to continue her conquest. May Ashurbanipal be honored by us!

And conquest, of a sort, has already gotten back underway with the inheritance of the tiny remnant of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. More importantly, this inheritance gives us in-game claims over the entire Kingdom and the prospect of real gains. Then there are of course the new opportunities in the east now the Turks have fallen ...

That was a chaotic era. Niv is now king, but I don't think the underlying problem is solved. Many Muslims remain in Assyria, and the Messalians will remain a threat - and the new regime is too dependent on the Cumans.

Let's see how Niv does.

There remain a hell of a lot of tensions still at play in Assyria (and you are right that we haven't heard the last of the Messalians). It is a bold move to choose to jump into another major conflict so soon.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions:
A shame about the loss of India. Hopefully the Christians there won't face persecution from their new Hindu rulers.

I was worried about the Seljuks after the last update hinted at their size. Good to see they won't be a problem going forward.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
The loss of India is a shame; the immediate future for Assyria seems to be distinctly westward-facing. The sound of an HRE-backed coalition of Latins looking to take Jerusalem is not a pretty one. Niv has proved himself a capable enough warrior king, but after the limited gains against the splintered Seljuk lords there are definitely signs that he's not an all-powerful force…

Equally, I do wonder whether keeping hold of Jerusalem would be worth the inevitable religious turmoil. There's a decent amount to be won if you can win the land and the religious settlement (ie probably doing nasty things to Catholics and whoever else) but with a powerful Patriarchate back home the chances of compromise seem slim. Things will be bloody for a while yet, I think.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Assyria loses its foothold in India, but gains a new presence in the Holy Land. Hopefully their hold on Jerusalem will prove more resilient, especially with the collapse of their greatest immediate threat.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
India is lost.

With the Muslims divided and on the back foot, the Christians turn against each other.

I wonder if we'll see a Byzantine-Catholic Alliance? Byzantium was also at odds with Assyria earlier.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
The Malabar Coast was always going to be tough to hold unless your entire focus was on eastward expansion. The Seljuk break-up is extremely good in the short run, but there will be Muslim successors to take up the mantle. The KoJ may be trouble than it is worth. Thank you for another installment of the long running, March of the Assyrians.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
It would be a great opportunity to heal wounds align with the Byzantine empire against the Christian expansionists! Only then will the Eastern churches have an opportunity, not only against the pagans, but also against their own Christian brothers.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
the more things change
the more they stay the same. Seems the Assyrians traded one villain for another. All while the holy land looks to be filled with bloodshed. And I concur everyone's statements about India, such a shame that it was all for nought in the end, hopefully the Christian minorities would be treated well by their new overlords. If Niv is still looking for allies, perhaps it'd be a prime opportunity to befriend the Byzantines, enemy of my enemy after all, and I reckon the East Romans would still be looking for payback for the attempted crusade on their lands (Assuming that happened).
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
the mighty Seljuk Empire spiralling catastrophic internal conflict. In this, the Turks’ experience shared many parallels with Assyria – with new religious movements, minority currents, steppe elements and regional lords all playing a role in pulling the country apart. Yet, there was to be no Seljuk Niv, and their once powerful empire splintered into dozens of distinct polities over the course of the 1280s and 1290s.
An interesting outcome that backs up your anti-blobbing observations re the settings you’ve used.
the rise of a new self-declared Sunni Caliphate from the deserts of western Oman forced the Assyrians into retreat.
Nature does abhor a vacuum.
With the Pope denouncing Niv’s ascension, the Holy Roman Emperor Dietrich, who ruled the city of Jerusalem and much of the Palestinian coast, swore to take up the cross and lead a Crusade to expel the heretics from the Holy Land and restore a Catholic Kingdom of Jerusalem under his own leadership.
Another generation-defining conflict approaches, by the looks of it.
The Palestinian Wars had started.
Ominous music (the Imperial March) plays. Where is General Kenobi going to deploy? ;)
The sad end to the Malabar Raj! So long as Assyria was a united realm, the local Indian powers were largely dissuaded from attacking. But when we became so weak there was no prospect of us sending aid to the east during that long civil war, they pounced and destroyed our Indian foothold.
Very sad. Like a plant under stress, the outer limbs are the first to wither and die.
Shameless LoTR reference well spotted! :D
These references are there to be noted, n’est pas? :D
As for oath breaking Cumans - unpaid mercenaries was the in game inspiration
Thought it must have been that. Once more you take a relatively mundane piece of game mechanics and turn it into something realistic and also far more interesting and dramatic for the narrative. You are a master at that - hat doffed. :cool:
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
The Palestinian Wars 1301-1320
The Palestinian Wars 1301-1320

1657221695862.png

The twenty year conflict in the Levant initiated by Niv II’s decision to forcefully press his claim to the Kingdom of Jerusalem progressed through a number of different stages as it escalated into a matter of Assyria’s very existence. In the first part of the conflict, the Assyrians faced down the Crusader lords of Outremer. Benefiting from much greater numbers and a unified leadership under the talented generalship of their King, the Assyrians made strong gains – capturing a number of fortresses east of the Jordan River and placing Jerusalem and Jaffa under siege.

The tide of the conflict started to change after German forces began to arrive in the Levant from around 1303, and especially after the Kaiser himself landed at Beirut in 1304. The Germans, greatly outnumbering the Assyrians, captured Acre, relieved Jerusalem and Jaffa and reclaimed most of the Jordan Valley, all the while sparing with the Assyrians leading to heavy losses on both sides.

1657221746119.png

While the Germans could field more men, and had a steady stream of reinforcements from Europe that the Assyrians could not match, the course of the conflict began to bend in Nineveh’s favour in the face of a number of key victories on the field of battle that Niv led his men to. Fighting was attritional and costly, but within a couple of years the momentum of the German advance had been halted and by 1307 the Assyrians were beginning to make gains – pushing back into the Jordan valley, recapturing Acre and most importantly of all bringing Jerusalem under siege once again. Assyrian prospects were further enhanced when the Emperor Dietrich passed away as a break out of cholera in Jaffa ripped through his army. His successor Friedrich, far away in Europe, was less focussed on the Palestinian conflict, and as such limited the resources being sent to the long campaign in Outremer.

1657221798662.png

It was during this siege of Jerusalem that relations between the crown and Cumans finally broke down. Having maintained a testing relationship with the monarchy ever since their first arrival in Assyria decades before, the Cumans had been particularly reluctant to become involved in a great conflict with their Catholic co-religionists in Palestine. Notably, they had been alienated by an increasingly anti-Catholic Assyrian attitude and the very heavy losses their forces had sustained. These concerns had been papered over with the reward of ample payment and loot, yet with the Assyrian state’s coffers completely emptied by the costly conflict, the Cuman’s were left unpaid, relying only on the promises of future rewards. As the Assyrian army was afflicted by food shortages and disease during its long siege of Jerusalem, the Cuman Khan Burak turned against his King and raised the flag of rebellion – threatening to take the Holy Land for himself.

With the Cumans making up around a third of the Assyrian army, this was a near mortal blow. While Niv fought the Cumans off, he lacked the numbers to maintain the siege without them and withdrew back east of the Jordan river. Meanwhile, the Cumans were able to withdraw north and capture Acre – attracting some support from the local Latins as they established a stronghold from which they launched debilitating raids throughout the Levant. During this lull in the fighting, the Assyrians were able to gather fresh troops from Mesopotamia for a renewed attack – returning to besiege Jerusalem once more and finally capturing the city in 1312. Shortly thereafter the Holy Roman Emperor agreed to a truce – dividing the Holy Land between German territories in the Lebanon and Palestinian coast and Assyrian lands in the interior, including Jerusalem itself. Notably, Niv agreed to renounce the title King of Jerusalem, in claim of the less ostentatious King of Philistia.

1657221823940.png

While Niv and the Assyrians appeared to be on the precipice of a lasting victory, word arrived that a new threat was tumbling down the Syrian coast from the north. Burak Khan, holed up in Acre, was well aware of the impending threat as the conflict between the Germans and Assyrians wound down and had sent a messenger to his ethnic kin in Anatolia seeking allies and aid. Cuman Anatolia had retained the febrile instability of the Steppe, with many factions squabbling for power among one another. One of the great tribal leaders of the region, Tunga Khan, saw in his compatriots’ plea an opportunity to escape a weak position in Anatolia and strike out to conquer new lands. He would therefore lead not only fifteen thousand riders, but wagons of women and children, herds of animals and thousands of horses, southwards towards the Holy Land. As Tunga and Burak united, they were instantly the greatest power in Palestine – forcing Niv into a retreat back to Damascus yet again and capturing Jerusalem in 1313. With near total control over the region, the two Khans would set out to build a Cuman Kingdom in Philistia, while regularly driving deep into Assyrian territory, harassing Niv’s armies and threatening to attack locations as far east as Mesopotamia.

1657221853294.png

Assyria’s struggles with the Cumans convinced others of its weakness in the Levant. While the Cumans consolidated their grip in Philistia, two new threats arose. In the south, Shia Arab tribes from the deserts south of Palestine invaded Assyrian territory – capturing the fortresses of Kerak and Monreal to the east of the Dead Sea and raiding far to the north. As King Niv sought to address this threat, he was lured into the greatest military disaster of his long and bloody reign. The Assyrians were expertly outmanoeuvred by the Muslims, who isolated the Christian army from all key sources of water before pouncing upon their foe – almost completely destroying the Assyrian army. The Shia captured the Crown Prince, Isho, on the field while Niv himself barely escaped to the north with his life. Over the following years, although their gains were undermined by tribal infighting, the Shia pushed on to capture Amman and enter into a struggle for the Holy City itself against the Cumans.

1657221888729.png

A further threat came from the Druze. This small, somewhat esoteric, ethno-religious group had its origins in an offshoot in the eleventh century Shia Fatimid Caliphate. After its followers were forced to flee Egypt, they settled in the region to the east of Damascus, the Jabal al-Druze. Since then they had lived mostly in peace under Muslim and Christian masters alike, yet now they had sensed an opportunity to strike out for independence and in 1314 rose up to occupy their homeland and move against the great city of Damascus.

1657221911298.png

By now, King Niv cut an isolated figure. His wars had heavily indebted his realm, limiting its opportunities to further finance the war, it had suffered horrendous manpower losses that could not be easily recouped, its most effective military force of the past several decades – the Cumans – were in arms against it, and its exhausted nobility and martial elite were losing patience and faith in their King’s ambitions. A reprieve, of a sort, arrived in 1316 with another crucial battlefield triumph. At Qasr Amra, not far from Damascus, the royal army, outnumbered two to one, crushed the Druze on the open field, scattering their force and defeating their rebellion once and for all. Crucially, this ensured that the link between the Assyrian Levant and Mesopotamia remained open and revived Niv’s wavering military reputation.

1657221929700.png

Following the victory over the Druze, Niv left his army in Damascus and returned to Nineveh. There he sought to calm the faltering support of his nobility – many of whom were demanding that the King abandon his conquests in Palestine in order to avert graver disaster. However, his real target was the Church and Patriarch Tavish III. The Nestorian religious hierarchy had maintained an ambiguous relationship to the Palestinian Wars, the lengthy conflict, predominantly with Catholic powers, over the Holy Land. Importantly, they had maintain the bar against members of Nestorian holy orders from taking up arms against fellow Christians. Lacking the manpower to reclaim suzerainty over Palestine on his own, Niv hoped to tap into the last major unscathed source of soldiery open to him – the Order of Saint Addai. The Patriarch’s demands were significant – grants of land in Mesopotamia, greater legal and tax privileges for the Church in Assyria, support for religious missions to maintain links to the St Thomas Christians in India and ecclesiastical control of the most important holy sites in Jerusalem and its surrounds. Niv agreed to everything and in return, was given the men he asked for to march west one last time.

1657221951221.png

Replenished with the men of the Order, Niv set out from Damascus in 1317 for a final do or die campaign against the Cumans. Despite incurring very heavy losses, his men scored key victories that put the Cumans into retreat and allowed the Assyrians to bring Jerusalem itself under siege. With the Turkic armies just as weary as the Assyrians, after the Holy City fell in 1320, the Khans Tunga and Burak, although still controlling the better part of Philistia, was finally ready to negotiate. Accepting the end of his dream of a Cuman Kingdom in the Holy Land, Tunga secured new rights for settlement across the Assyrian domain. While the existing Cuman population of Assyria was allowed to return to their settlements around Lake Urmia, the newly arrived wave of Anatolian Cumans were granted land rights in Palestine and northern Mesopotamia – further swelling the growing Turkic component of Assyrian society. Moreover, they would resume their previous status under the military service of the Assyrian crown. In exchange, they swore allegiance to Nineveh as their overlord.

1657221967450.png

With peace now secured with their main foe, the Assyrians and Cumans joined together to sweep the Shia back into their home territories before the end of the year. Two decades after first inheriting the crown of Jerusalem, Niv’s division of Palestine was now complete.
 
  • 7Like
  • 2Love
Reactions:
A long one, and a tough old fight to say the least! Niv entered this war in his mid-30s - full of ambition and confidence and ended it aged 55, a shell shocked and broken figure with a Kingdom he has driven to the verge of ruin. The telling of this conflict is fairly close to in game events.

I initially invaded the HRE (who had Jerusalem itself) and the minor Crusader Counts of the region. My plan was to quickly mop up the Counts before the Germans arrived and then have a single nice big war, that I would win in the end. That first phase of the conflict turned into a nightmarish war of attrition - our huge manpower and financial reserves were ground down to absolutely nothing. The Germans would send one army, we would grind them down in a battle of attirition and then another would arrive. At the same time, I never really beat the minor counts into submission (as you can see in the final map - one ended up surviving the whole 20 year war), and they remained a long term threat.

Things went really haywire when the Cuman mercs betrayed us for lack of payment. They started out as a small force but seemed to receive reinforcement with large 5 figure armies coming down the Levantine coast as described in the story - I'm not actually sure what the cause of this is. Can mercenary companies in rebellion receive reinforcements from their home regions? Regardless, they easily took over all of the Kingdom of Philistia (which the game renames the KoJ to for Assyrians) and were sitting at 90% and even 99% warscore for substantial stretches of time. Never mind the other major threats I had from the Shia launching a holy war in the south (and destroying my army) and the Druze having a very dangerous rebellion in Syria. We were very close to losing everything at this point. The explanation of our journey to convince the Patriarch to back the war wasn't a million miles off. I got an in game event to have our 'friend' join the war. That friend was the Grandmaster of the Order of Addai (whose holy order troops had been unavailable for a fight against fellow Christians). They helped me get just enough men together to get the upper hand over the Cumans and win the war in the end. A very close run thing (Niv II has certainly ridden more than a little luck through his rein - often being on the very brink of disaster before pulling it back in both this war and the civil wars he started out with).


A shame about the loss of India. Hopefully the Christians there won't face persecution from their new Hindu rulers.

I was worried about the Seljuks after the last update hinted at their size. Good to see they won't be a problem going forward.

Time will tell how the St Thomas Christians fair. It will be harder for them to go back to that minority status after a spell as the ruling caste in Malabar.

And the Seljuks disappearing in spectacular fashion was a huge boon for us - the only reason we could really commit to the sort of adventurism we embarked on in Palestine. If they had still been around we could rest assured there would have been Turks in Basra and Baghdad as soon as they smelt weakness.

The loss of India is a shame; the immediate future for Assyria seems to be distinctly westward-facing. The sound of an HRE-backed coalition of Latins looking to take Jerusalem is not a pretty one. Niv has proved himself a capable enough warrior king, but after the limited gains against the splintered Seljuk lords there are definitely signs that he's not an all-powerful force…

Equally, I do wonder whether keeping hold of Jerusalem would be worth the inevitable religious turmoil. There's a decent amount to be won if you can win the land and the religious settlement (ie probably doing nasty things to Catholics and whoever else) but with a powerful Patriarchate back home the chances of compromise seem slim. Things will be bloody for a while yet, I think.

Assyria has certainly lurched westward. Now that Palestine has been one - at least in part, and at horrendous cost - there are many questions to be answered. How does Assyria relate to its large Catholic population and the wider western world? Does it seek to continue westward expansion from here? How does the rest of the Christian world react? We shall have to see what awaits now we are moving past this period of endless bloodshed.

Assyria loses its foothold in India, but gains a new presence in the Holy Land. Hopefully their hold on Jerusalem will prove more resilient, especially with the collapse of their greatest immediate threat.

We now have the Holy City, and have cemented our claims to it with an entire generation, maybe two generations, of young men. We will have to pray that we don't have to fight for it again any time soon - the Byzantines are still perched in Syria, the Latins could make a play to reclaim it, the Muslims are not quite beaten yet in Arabia and we have the small matter of our own troublesome enemy within in the form of the ever menacing and growing Cuman presence.

India is lost.

With the Muslims divided and on the back foot, the Christians turn against each other.

I wonder if we'll see a Byzantine-Catholic Alliance? Byzantium was also at odds with Assyria earlier.

Thankfully for us, the Byzantines sat this one out and didn't join together with the Catholics - focussing on their own internal problems for now. We will have to wait and see how the different powers in this world reorientate to the new situation with Assyria planting its flag firmly in the Med. We are no longer that distant, intruiging, Christian state somewhere far off to the east - we are pushing right into the heart of the Christian world now.

The Malabar Coast was always going to be tough to hold unless your entire focus was on eastward expansion. The Seljuk break-up is extremely good in the short run, but there will be Muslim successors to take up the mantle. The KoJ may be trouble than it is worth. Thank you for another installment of the long running, March of the Assyrians.

Even in peace time it would have been no easy thing to defend Malabar from a major assault given my lack of coastal provinces and therefore ships in the Persian Gulf without the use of mercs (who aren't always available). My main defence was that the AI was scared to attack Malabar while I seemed strong, when we were weakened they took their chance.

The Seljuk collapse gave us the room to go on our mad expedition into Palestine. You were quite prescient noting that it might be more trouble than its worth! Those lands we have gained are fairly poor relative to our other territories, and came at incredible cost. Perhaps we would have been better off pushing into the east - if we aren't the ones assuming hegemony over the Persian world, then someone else surely will before long.

It would be a great opportunity to heal wounds align with the Byzantine empire against the Christian expansionists! Only then will the Eastern churches have an opportunity, not only against the pagans, but also against their own Christian brothers.

The Byzantines largely sat this conflict out - perhaps relieved to see many of their main foes (whether they be Assyrians, Latins or Cumans) having their attentions elsewhere at least for a time. Byzantine is at this stage going through its own internal religious chaos with a reformation within Orthodoxy pitting Paulicians against followers of Old Orthodoxy. An unstable time for all!

the more things change

This conflict must truly rank up there among the most blood soaked in the Holy Land's long, long history of devastating wars.

the more they stay the same. Seems the Assyrians traded one villain for another. All while the holy land looks to be filled with bloodshed. And I concur everyone's statements about India, such a shame that it was all for nought in the end, hopefully the Christian minorities would be treated well by their new overlords. If Niv is still looking for allies, perhaps it'd be a prime opportunity to befriend the Byzantines, enemy of my enemy after all, and I reckon the East Romans would still be looking for payback for the attempted crusade on their lands (Assuming that happened).

It was a tragedy for the St Thomas Christians that their brief period of power was brought to an end within a single century. We shall have to wait to see just how much of a legacy the Assyrian period leaves upon both India and Assyria alike, and if we ever return to the Malabar coast.

And the Byzantines did indeed have an attempted Crusade on their land some century or so ago. One of their emperors went over to Catholicism before being overthrown - the Latins then launched a (ultimately failed) Crusade to try to restore Catholicism in the Byzantine empire.

An interesting outcome that backs up your anti-blobbing observations re the settings you’ve used.

Nature does abhor a vacuum.

Another generation-defining conflict approaches, by the looks of it.

Ominous music (the Imperial March) plays. Where is General Kenobi going to deploy? ;)

Very sad. Like a plant under stress, the outer limbs are the first to wither and die.

These references are there to be noted, n’est pas? :D

Thought it must have been that. Once more you take a relatively mundane piece of game mechanics and turn it into something realistic and also far more interesting and dramatic for the narrative. You are a master at that - hat doffed. :cool:

I wish there was something akin to the decadence revolts in other religious groupings. Maybe not quite as extreme - but something that would split up large empires into regional fiefdoms. In CK2 it tends to unnaturally weaken the Muslims, who always seem to do far worse in game than IRL. Never mind the OP nature of Holy Fury's Crusading system.

And you were certainly right on the era defining conflict in Palestine - it was certainly a hell of a lot more than I was bargaining for when I launched my invasions!
 
  • 1
Reactions:
A moment of peace, bought at such a price. Nevertheless, Niv can perhaps console himself with the thought that he has managed to maintain his grip on the Holy City despite such a brutal and bloody series of trials, and that things could have gone much, much worse.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions: