• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Talks #8 - 17th of April 2024

Hello, and welcome to the eighth iteration of Tinto Talks where we talk about what we are doing in our very secret future game, with the code name Project Caesar.

Btw, on a completely unrelated note, Paradox Tinto has just announced our new expansion ‘Winds of Change’ for EU4. Go check out its cool contents and trailer!




This week we’ll continue talking about the economical part of the game. Last week we talked about the different items in the monthly budget, and now we’ll continue with explaining some of the core concepts of the economy. Please be aware that all images here are tooltips or parts of tooltips, and some are very much Work in Progress!


Loans and Bankruptcy
Let's start with Loans, which will work a fair bit differently than any other previous Paradox GSG. At first glance, it is kind of similar to previous games, where you can take a loan, you get money, and you pay interest on it for a set period of time. However, in Project Caesar, there are some new changes. Take a look at this WiP tooltip for taking a loan:

nCUH7H-1ErsukKQS9473NBnKTsR05CWHRCYIaB9ntYszKs6rU5K0qzaJ1m4OimczgJtGgcJqfhzX94L9kRwi7qoi-A3J1yaQWyPzYx7e0NjbAXY3eGRsd27ZKVoXYabnz0OG_kwl1t3lpUCMsjzapNE

Yeah, 10% interest is perfectly fair…

In this game, you are not borrowing money from an abstract national bank, but instead, your internal loans are taken from what the estates have made available. The estates invest money they have, not only in immediate gains for their own power, or other ways that benefit the country, or other [REDACTED], but they also invest in having money available for the country, where they will benefit from the interests.

If there is no money to borrow from the estates available and you have no ducats left, you will go bankrupt, which is a little bit more severe than in, let's say EU4...

There is also another way to get gold, you can send a diplomat to one of the banking countries, like Peruzzi and Bardi, if there is one that you know of within diplomatic range, to request a loan. Make sure you don’t forget to pay them on time, or default on the loans, or you may never be able to loan from them again.


Core Concepts
So let’s continue, by taking a look at the tooltip for a location, so we can quickly have a reference to some important aspects in the rest of this development diary.

av2ohVCnmA8MfMHXUexuoSX7wbs5Tz0VGuP-pAGPyjo6bS_yDc4UK0pp8B0jRMDkvwXAwx9uI2Cegs3jpcIKdyR7v0kO5WtLCTD9taUF98vYzSaED6YUjOgV-oXjxgVsswlfOqlUqMoRYs8a5eu-w5k

Enjoy the nice placeholder icons, sadly the forum does not allow for nested tooltips, like the game does…


Food
If you notice the line of food above, you see that Kalmar is not self-sufficient in food, and needs to rely on the rest of Östra Småland for food, unless they buy it from the local market.
kib0U5HlyH-L2LLv71VDVZ6iOxXPS4YyDFTAS18O4FmhFnZi9XNoC67LnjO32Gnpqls7-nhY53fDQBCG3XOKR6fX1lVaOCOmLA-n2Vhq8ivty4UmijPYiazrqSpNAV5eSxchS3SvzMXPY5N266lbeV0

Even the small town of Kalmar needs food from nearby locations…

Primarily, there are a lot of burghers here that consume a lot of food. There are also a lot of modifiers that impact how much food the location produces as well.

If the granaries in Östra Småland are close to full, we would sell their surplus to the local market in Riga, but only get about 56% of the profit, as we only have 56% control in Kalmar. If the entire province lacks food, we would have to buy food at 100% of the current price in that market. The price for food is different in each market, and depends entirely on how much food is sold to that market.





Taxes
We mentioned taxes in last week's Tinto Talk, and specifically mentioned Tax Base there. The tax base of an estate is based on the total of all their Tax Base in all the locations they are present in.


aGfWyrqBlFKjmUSP_b-3bnRVeXPVVdZj8xLUgyu48qKLbW66a_hWwg7Z36YmC9E4zPYOI-CsSwPZFitdxahwe5-xuTPdp_YCA1sF_4g0aiBL_3y9Eetnak6lZfL67ql0e1ioCL1hbXYE3EmJ5-NYYaI

Quickly find the error in the text in this tooltip!

We are slowly increasing our control over Kalmar up to 58.2%, so the tax base will be slowly increasing, and if we would get it to the 100 maximum, it would be even bigger.

As you can see here, the nobility and the burghers have a fair bit of power here, and the peasants have basically none. Currently, we are able to tax more from the burghers each month, and could probably go above the 25% tax rate we have currently set on their estate.

To clarify, only the money that is in the “potential” row exists, and anything you don’t tax on that goes to the estates. So you get 0.05 ducats there (perhaps more, but Paradox rounding), and the remaining 0.37 goes to the estates.



Raw Materials
As you noticed in the tooltips above, we talk about Raw Materials and Resource Gathering Operations. Every location has one raw material possible that can be extracted, this includes things like lumber, stone, grain, amber, or copper. Of course, there are other ways to get access to the raw materials than merely owning and controlling a location.

Only peasants and slaves will work on gathering raw materials, and how many will work with it depends on how big of an infrastructure you have built up for that. Pops that are working with this will not be producing food, unless the goods are food related.

The maximum size of an infrastructure that can be built up depends on population, development, technologies, and societal values.


goa9yXee37SXwcMqzUuhChETBoZB7CLw9Q1xfT6Z4x60C1pcSOkvvUSKfdi__IrWjZbby4oVOI-LAvFOhxYbWT8LrF_kWbFBh7PQpAw3OYZjr6E17qfS9k2XZkA5LZ-7NlTD2bcbk3_0JWIOY3rHklI




We mentioned buildings in one tooltip earlier, and next week we will talk about how they work in Project Caesar.
 
  • 255Like
  • 176Love
  • 15
  • 12
  • 6
Reactions:
Will we be able to pay a loan back earlier than expected and if so, will we still have to pay the total interest as in EU4 or less?

yes and yes, full interest
 
  • 22Like
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2
Reactions:
If I am Portugal and I conquer Goa, but I don't build any control mechanisms so control = 0%, then my assumption is that while I am not going to benefit, the economy in Goa will continue to develop. The money will just stay local. You could argue that Goa will do even better without me extracting wealth from it. Locals will have more money with which to consume, develop, grow wealthy, etc.

That's what I am not getting. If I have 0% control, then Goa just stagnates? What happens to Goa?

What is "develop?"

In the situation where you have 0% control.. (which implies you have even moved away the army that you have used).

Then I suspect, due to population size of Goa, and richness of it, it would take less than a year or two before you see a rebellion there, probably backed by Bijarpur or whoever is friendly and big nearby.

The drawback here is that when you conquered Goa it probably cost you lots of warscore. For someone else when its close to 0% control, the conquer cost is close to 0% as well, so unless you can quickly get back there, you'll get a peace enforced on you rather quickly.
 
Are there any implications of low control on warfare?

Yes.

the cost for taking something in peace scales with their control
 
  • 42
  • 36Like
  • 25Love
  • 4
Reactions:
For someone else when its close to 0% control, the conquer cost is close to 0% as well, so unless you can quickly get back there, you'll get a peace enforced on you rather quickly.
Plenty of quite beautiful implications here. First off, I adore the fact that low control means lower pwsc. The "peace enforced" comment on the other hand implies to me that (a) there are set war goals for before the war and (b) once those war goals are achieved peace may immediately be enforced?
 
  • 8
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Are banking countries one form of landless countries you previously mentioned?

Also, can you inherit debt with these countries when you Annex neighbours, I believe that was what actually happened, apart from when they couldn't flex e.g. Ottoman conquests
I initially though they could be things like religious orders (like the Order of Malta currently being a nation under international law), but I guess they can also model corporations (Trade companies?).
 
You say that non-taxed money that does not get used for rebellion gets used to buy slightly prettier houses and stuff. Does that have some sort of a gameplay effect, e.g. the peasants being more productive because their fancy houses are better insulated and thus they get less sick in the winter?

Otherwise you get the counterintuitive situation where economic development comes exclusively from central authorities reinvesting taxation money, and local authorities exclusively use their money frivolously in ways that brings no benefit to local prosperity.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
You say that non-taxed money that does not get used for rebellion gets used to buy slightly prettier houses and stuff. Does that have some sort of a gameplay effect, e.g. the peasants being more productive because their fancy houses are better insulated and thus they get less sick in the winter?

Otherwise you get the counterintuitive situation where economic development comes exclusively from central authorities reinvesting taxation money, and local authorities exclusively use their money frivolously in ways that brings no benefit to local prosperity.

I think that's the point. Decentralization doesn't mean having no control over large swathes of territories, but using subjects to rule them instead. Low control doesn't mean "local administration", it means "no administration". If you want local administration, use a subject.

The "pretty houses" isn't a gameplay implication, because if it were, then it would incentivize not increasing control in some form or another, which defeats the whole point of the system.
 
  • 6
  • 1
Reactions:
Plenty of quite beautiful implications here. First off, I adore the fact that low control means lower pwsc. The "peace enforced" comment on the other hand implies to me that (a) there are set war goals for before the war and (b) once those war goals are achieved peace may immediately be enforced?
Could we see a mechanic where your war exhaustion goes up really quickly if the enemy's wargoal targets provinces where you have low control? Representing that your nobility and other estates have very little interest on expending gold and blood fighting for some place they had no power anyway?
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
What is "develop?"

In the situation where you have 0% control.. (which implies you have even moved away the army that you have used).

Then I suspect, due to population size of Goa, and richness of it, it would take less than a year or two before you see a rebellion there, probably backed by Bijarpur or whoever is friendly and big nearby.

The drawback here is that when you conquered Goa it probably cost you lots of warscore. For someone else when its close to 0% control, the conquer cost is close to 0% as well, so unless you can quickly get back there, you'll get a peace enforced on you rather quickly.
Does army increase control?
 
I think that's the point. Decentralization doesn't mean having no control over large swathes of territories, but using subjects to rule them instead. Low control doesn't mean "local administration", it means "no administration". If you want local administration, use a subject.

The "pretty houses" isn't a gameplay implication, because if it were, then it would incentivize not increasing control in some form or another, which defeats the whole point of the system.
Hopefully subject interactions are as a result more fleshed out in this game. If we are to be incentivized to use subjects a lot more in the early game, I'd definitely like it so that we have much more ways to influence them, and perhaps integrating them over long periods of time as technology and central institutions improve and grow in influence.
 
  • 5
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Very interesting. I am wondering how uncolonized provinces will be represented. Will it be similar to something like decentralized nations in Victoria 3?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Hopefully subject interactions are as a result more fleshed out in this game. If we are to be incentivized to use subjects a lot more in the early game, I'd definitely like it so that we have much more ways to influence them, and perhaps integrating them over long periods of time as technology and central institutions improve and grow in influence.
I certainly hope so. The fact that you're encouraged to create subjects to handle low-control territories in this game might mean that it could very well be possible to represent India in this time period after all (control basically not extending outside of the capital, meaning subjects for pretty much every location, recursively).
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I certainly hope so. The fact that you're encouraged to create subjects to handle low-control territories in this game might mean that it could very well be possible to represent India in this time period after all (control basically not extending outside of the capital, meaning subjects for pretty much every location, recursively).
ooh yes, looks like your idea for M&T can be implemented much better here.
 
I guess I’m fine with strait crossings as long as you have naval control of a sea tile (so you can protect a bridge built a la Xerxes or whatever), but imo the profusion of strait crossings was one of the reasons navies were so weak in EU4. Allowing strait crossings without naval support seems problematic.
 
  • 5
  • 1Like
Reactions: