• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Talks #55 - 19th of March 2025

Welcome to another Tinto Talks, the Happy Wednesday where we give you information about our rather secret game with the Codename Project Caesar, so that we can get feedback to improve the game before launch.

As we mentioned last week, we are spending four weeks going through how your feedback together with internal testing have shaped the game in this last year. Today it is time to talk about the changes that are related to the political part of the game.

Estate Power
The power of the estates is one of the most important aspects of the core game loops of Project Caesar, so much so that we had to rearrange what we show in the top bar in the UI. We added so you can easily see each estate's current power and satisfaction, without having to go into a special screen.

As part of the gameplay loop is about breaking the power of the estates and strengthening the central state as you shape a modern country, basing the core power of the estates to how many pops they had made a gameplay where urbanizing and developing your country would weaken the central government.

The main change is that the amount of pops of a certain estate impact their power, but also impact the crown power with the same base value, before any privileges or laws give more power to the estate. This makes the relative power distribution between the estates feel logical, but the weakening of the crown is due to the privileges granted. This further ties in with advances increasing crown power and the increase of absolutism in later ages.

nobles.png

It's just a cost of a few hundred of stability to remove all those privileges. And maybe not give that noble with insane stats command over the army.. And go more plutocratic? Then we can reduce their power below 30%.. But the +0.17 military tactics is good… tough choices..


As characters all have an estate they belong to, it’s now also added in that giving characters command of armies or navies, or a place in the cabinet increases the power of the estate they belong to. A total of 25% for armies, 25% from navies and 25% from cabinet positions can be added.

Connected to this, the direct family of the ruler is now always considered to be part of the crown estate, so if you want to strengthen the crown you may want to risk them commanding armies.


55_crown_estate.png

Having a crown prince in the cabinet helps a bit..


Parliament
When it comes to the parliament we keep adding new agendas and issues from feedback and internal testing, but some important changes that come from you guys include the following.

First of all, we added the Dutch-style parliament with only nobles and burghers, which you currently have access to if you have the Low Franconian culture.

We also made it so that if you keep giving out the unique privileges for the nobles in Poland, you will end up in a situation where you need 100% of the support to pass anything in the parliament.

We also added a building that was requested by the community, which is available through an advance in the Age of Discovery.

parliament.png

Could be useful…


Societal Values & Government Reforms
While we were happy with how societal values were indirectly influenced by laws & privileges, they had the problem that eventually anything with a drift towards one direction would eventually get to the extreme. Now one could change this by lowering the amount it would drift, but that would make for rather dull gameplay, and eventually you’d get to extremes anyway.

So what we did instead was to make a sort of soft-cap for how far a value could drift, at 100 times the current drift. So if you manage to stack up to +0.75 monthly towards Naval then you could get the values all the way to 75 Naval before it stopped there. If you’d drop to less than +0.75 naval, you’d still be at 75 naval though, as you’d not progress to the other side until you get all the way to at least +0.01 to land! This has the added benefit of you being able to shape your country how you want over a longer period of time, and even if you want to be a humanist country, you may not get further than a 65 on that slider, as you may not be willing to give up other aspects.

towards_capital.png

If we increase our trade income, we can push it even further..



While working on adding content this year, we added government reforms to every age, and while doing so, we decided to tie some of them to societal values. So now about half of the government reforms that are available to every country require that a specific societal value at least 50 to be selectable, and if you drop below that, you’d lose the reform. Some examples include that Religious Tolerance requires a country to be Humanist, while Bank Ledgers requires a country to have a Capital Economy.


Proximity and Control
The proximity and control gameplay loop is one of the most beloved by our playtesting, and it has been tweaked a fair bit during the last year, so as to make it feel more natural.

Proximity now traces along rivers, where it's even easier to propagate proximity and market access downstream.

proximity.png
And where in the world are we now?


The buildings that act as proximity sources besides the capital, like the Bailiff, have been made a bit more powerful, but also far more costly.

We also changed how roads are built, slowing them down by 50% as default, and rugged terrain like Mountains makes road-building far slower. I guess the rest of the team did not like my Nidaros-Oslo highway..

We also tweaked how Maritime Presence works, with adding a decay to the current value, so that unless you invest in naval infrastructure and/or a navy, your control propagation over coastal seazones is limited.

We improved the impact from some buildings, and navies now also increase maritime presence in every seazone in the “seazone” province they are currently in. There is also an objective you can assign to navies to patrol any area/province you want and it will move around increasing your maritime presence.


presence.png

A single galley does not provide much presence i guess…


Stay tuned, as next week we will talk about changes to Diplomacy and Military…
 
  • 156Love
  • 126Like
  • 6
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
Is it both ways or only downstream (I think it was sad somewhere before to be only downstream and a lot of people argued it should be bidirectional as you travel to the place and then back either way going both river directions once)?

both ways, but downstream is better
 
  • 82Like
  • 20Love
  • 13
  • 4
  • 1
Reactions:
  • 71Love
  • 45Like
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1
Reactions:
Happy to see the Dutch Parliament implemented. Now I just need to convince you guys to add Tilburg and all my Dutch requests (so far) will have been implemented. Well, outside of the impossible polders.
 
How does the estate power work when we have buildings that give local estate power?
It does not seem that these buildings are working?

they give estate power yes
 
  • 40Like
  • 3
Reactions:
There is also an objective you can assign to navies to patrol any area/province you want and it will move around increasing your maritime presence.
That's a great addition! I thought that not having ships going around the sea like in EU4(totally unrelated game btw) was going to look weird, will it also reduce privateering in the seazones or is there a separate "hunt pirates" objective for that?
 
Last edited:
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:

Related to rivers and river maps, will there be any system somewhat representing river basins.
Recently found out that many technologies, customs and cultures actually followed river basins.

Would be nice to somehow represent this in game for tech/culture spread.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
@Johan I am perhaps a bit over the line, however, there was a great recent proposal here: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/raiding-modeled-after-conquistadors.1730801/

expanding on the Conquistador system into a broader Militarized Expeditions mechanic. This can cover everything from raids to crusades and colonial conquests of Spain and Russia. Keeps things structured, and prevents mechanics bloat. can also be a solution for multiple other non-war military events.

Because what was so different between Conquistadors(conquering Aztecs) and Cossacks(conquering Siberia) if not only the ocean? the mechanic can be the same with a unique technology to make expeditions overseas for Iberia
 
  • 6Like
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Tbh given the room for sudden changes with events I think it'd be better to leave a bit of room for removal that is larger than the room for addition. So say if a reform requires 50 to be enacted, maybe don't remove it until it goes below 40 (and display a warning as soon as the value is below 50)
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Honestly, I would prefer different societal values to have balanced upsides and downsides that balance each other so staying in the middle could also be a viable option instead of always trying to max each societal value to 100
 
  • 13
  • 3Like
  • 2Love
  • 1
Reactions:
While working on adding content this year, we added government reforms to every age, and while doing so, we decided to tie some of them to societal values. So now about half of the government reforms that are available to every country require that a specific societal value at least 50 to be selectable, and if you drop below that, you’d lose the reform.

I really like it as a general rule.
Basically you cannot just choose societal values for your country purely based on what modifiers it gives, you have to mean it.
The only question is that of balancing. Will it be easy enough to get that 50, or will it force you into decisions you don't like just to get that 50 in one direction.
 
Okay, but for the record, the growing influence, wealth, and power of the burghers during this period are historical. It's linked to urbanization (although the causal link is debatable), and in Western and Central Europe, this rise was instrumentalized by the Crown to undermine the power of the nobility and centralize the state.

Thus, subordinating the power of the Crown to the crushing of the burghers might be contrary to history, even if it's an understandable game design choice.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
So now about half of the government reforms that are available to every country require that a specific societal value at least 50 to be selectable, and if you drop below that, you’d lose the reform. Some examples include that Religious Tolerance requires a country to be Humanist, while Bank Ledgers requires a country to have a Capital Economy.
This feels like one of those arbitrary restrictions that I really don't like, right up there with "borders are force-fields". You should be able to pass a reform that your society doesn't like, at the cost of stability.

Capital economies didn't start that way. They all started as traditional economies and were changed one reform at a time.
 
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
a humanist country

Religious Tolerance requires a country to be Humanist

You talk about changes made based on feedback, but you appear to have ignored the feedback regarding the mislabeling of this societal value. Why?
Humanism in this time period has nothing to do with religious tolerance - in fact, almost all the famous humanists were clergymen, like Enea Silvio Bartolomeo Piccolomini, i.e. Pope Pius II.

Everyone who knows anything about humanism in this game's time period will be confused or annoyed, and what are you going to do about all the narrative content about humanism? It clashes with your modern use of the word...
 
Last edited:
  • 11
  • 6
  • 1Haha
Reactions: