• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Mingmung

General
35 Badges
Aug 23, 2014
2.127
1.922
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
Hello there,

There are already multiple suggestions on how to improve France in general, but this one is about the map in particular. So, without further addo, my proposition for France:
index.php
Black dots obviously indicate the capital-cities of the respective provinces. Some have been changed in terms of location, because they are not in the correct spot in the base-game. I generally used Google Maps for that. A disclaimer: This is a suggestion; a piece of advice, so it's by no means definitive. Province-shapes, in particular, can be much more aesthetic than shown here. I explain certain 'design'-choices down here. I added 9 fully new provinces in the French region; most of them in the south and middle portions.

It would be hard to actually talk about all the new provinces if they aren't numbered, so here we go:
index.php


The first state is Brittany:
1: Brest or Cornouaille: with either Brest or Quimper as capital. I would personally go for Brest, as it's already the capital of the province in the base-game, but it's in the location of Quimper. Brest quickly gained importance within EU4's timeframe as an important harbor-city. The current name for the province, Finistère, was introduced after the French Revolution, so it's anachronistic.
2: Saint-Malo: Armor, while a Breton name, is anachronistic; also created after the French Revolution. It should just be called after its capital; Saint-Malo. The location should also be shifted, as it's currently in the location of the city of Dol.
946px-France_Pays_bretons_map.svg.png
3: Vannetais: Only the location of the city of Vannes has been corrected.
4: Rennais: Nothing has changed here.
5: Nantais: Nothing has changed.

The second state is Normandy:
6: Cotentin: Nothing has changed here.
7: Caen: Nothing has changed here.
8: Rouen: The name has been changed to its capital, Rouen. This is because Caux is a geographical entity which didn't encompass the city of Rouen itself. Neither was it some kind of duchy or county. The location of Rouen is also corrected, as it was placed too much to the north. A small part of this province has been given to Chartres, that's because the city of Evreux was already under French control in 1444.
Carte_pays_Caux1.png
9: Alençon: Nothing has changed here.

The third state is Ile-de-France:
10: Valois: The capital of Soissons has been shifted to the correct location, it was way off.
11: Chartres: As mentioned earlier, the city of (2) Evreux has been given to this province. (1) Chartres itself is obviously still the provincial capital, its placement has been corrected slightly, though.
12: Paris: Nothing has changed here.
13: Nemours: Not much has changed, only a small part has been given to Troyes. More about that later.

The fourth state is Champagne:
14: Rethelois: The capital of Rethel has been moved to the correct location; a minor change.
15: Reims: Nothing has changed here.
16: Troyes: The city of Troyes has been moved to the correct location, but in order to do that, a part of Nemours had to be given to the province. It should be in an almost direct line beneath Reims, but this isn't the case in the base-game.

The fifth state is Loire (the Loire-river Valley):
17: Maine: The capital of Le Mans has been shifted to the correct location.
18: Anjou: The capital of Angers has been moved more to the north, so the shape of the river has to be changed a little, too. It was in the incorrect location.
19: Touraine: Nothing has changed here. I really wanted to squeeze Blois between Touraine and Orleanais, but it would result in a true mini-province, sadly. If you guys find a way, make it happen! It was a very important and populated region.
20: Orleanais: Nothing has changed here.
21: Berry: The location of the capital, Bourges, was way off. So, it has been changed to the correct location. A very small part of the province has been given to the new province of La Marche. A very subtle change, though.

The sixth state is Lorraine, Metz and Lorraine are also a part of this state, but not shown on this map:
22: Verdun: First new province. Part of the new Verdun/Trois Eveches (Three Bishoprics) tag. It was an independent bishopric, conquered by France in the 16th century alongside Toul and Metz. This would mean that the current in-game province of Trois Eveches gets renamed to Metz itself and becomes a part of this tag.
Trois-%C3%89v%C3%AAch%C3%A9s.png
23: Barrois: The city of Bar-le-Duc has been shifted to the correct location.

The seventh state is Burgundy:
24: Auxerrois: Its shape has been adjusted to make way for its actual capital; Auxerre. Its current capital is Semur, an important castle, but it wasn't the historical capital of this county. Auxerrois is obviously named after Auxerre itself.
Karte_Haus_Burgund_4_EN.png

Another map showing the divisions of Burgundy: https://www.themaparchive.com/burgundian-lands-13631477.html
25: Nevers: It has grown a bit in size; taking some parts of Charolais.
26: Dijonnais: Adjusted its size and shape a bit.
27: Charolais: Its far too big in the basegame, bigger than it historically was. Decided to make it much smaller for Mâcon, for better historical divisions. It having salt as a trade-good doesn't make sense, by the way. The only salt-winning the Burgundian dukes did, was in Salins - Franche Comté. It should be livestock, as Charolais is known for its breed of cow, which already existed in some form back in the 15th century.
28: Mâcon: Second new province for the French region, to make historical shapes more likely and to break-up the big Charolais province. It was a Burgundian county, like Auxerrois and Charolais. It should have wine as tradegood.
Habsburg_dominions_1700.png

The eighth state is the new state of Franche-Comté:
Disclaimer: I've been convinced by multiple people that France-Comté might indeed be too big. There is a way to separate it into multiple provinces while still staying true to the timeline of EU4. I went for three small provinces, but if they're too small they can always be merged into two provinces. The argument for such small provinces is them being part of the HRE, which has a greater province-density to begin with. Ibiza, Avignon and Dobrzyn are small, too. A state can never have just two provinces, that's why Mâcon could be given to this state (even if not part of this region, it wouldn't be the first time such a thing happens). This region was historically separated into three bailliages.
Franche-Comte-bailliage.jpg
29: Gray: Although Vesoul was the capital of the bailliage of the north, it wasn't the economical capital. Gray was bigger and wealthier. Vesoul was also plundered and burned-down multiple times. Gray was much more important. Could be given grain as tradegood.
30: Besançon: Although not under direct Burgundian control, it was still under heavy influence by the dukes. It was the most important and biggest city of the whole Franche-Comté, also semi-independent. It could be given its own releasable tag: The Free City of Besançon. Some very good wines are from this region, so it could be given wine as tradegood.
31: Salins: Salins-les-Bains was a major saltproduction-site, the reason why the current Franche-Comté province has salt as tradegood. If Franche-Comté can only be split in two provinces, I'd go for Besançon and Salins.

The nineth state is Poitou:
32: Bas-Poitou: Nothing has changed.
33: Haut-Poitou: Moved the capital of Poitiers to the correct location, cutting a very, very small part from Anjou. A part of it has also been given away to make place for the new province of La Marche.
34: Saintonge: Moved the capital of Saintes a bit further inland.
35: Angoumois: Nothing has changed.

The tenth state is Massif Central:
36: La Marche: Another new province, first new one in the south. La Marche, with Guéret as capital, has been a county of France for a long time, separate from Limousin. It's still a separate province these days.
37: Limousin: Split to make way for La Marche. The general shape of the province, as well as the position of the river and the city of Limoges had to be corrected to make way for the new province. It's more historically accurate this way.
38: Bourbonnais: The location of the capital, Moulins, has changed.
39: Auvergne: Not much has changed here, only a small part of it has been given to Vivarais. More about that later.
800px-Map_France_1477-fr_sovereign_B%C3%A9arn.svg.png

The eleventh state is Savoy:
40: Lyonnais: Nothing has changed. There may be a chance for the province of Forez, but it has no priority. Should have a new Arpitan culture.
41: Dauphiné: Nothing has changed. Should have a new Arpitan culture.
42: Bresse: New province, split from Savoie. Capital is Bourg-en-Bresse. Tradegood should be livestock (because of its award-winning poulet) and the terrain should be hilly. It's quite small, but I think it could be included next to Geneva (upcoming Savoy-thread) to make Savoy more flavourful and historically correct. This part was conquered by France earlier than the rest of Savoy. Should have a new Arpitan culture.
index.php
43: Savoie: Has been split to create Bresse. The capital of Chambéry has been moved a bit. Should have a new Arpitan culture.
FRP-Map4.png

The twelfth state is Guyenne:
44: Périgord: Nothing has changed.
45: Quercy: Nothing has changed.
46: Rouergue: Nothing has changed.
I wonder if the Gascon culture of some of these provinces can be revisited. I think Occitan fits better for all three of them. Same with Limousin. Unless the Limousin dialect is closer to Gascon, of course. Debatable aspect.

The thirteenth state is Gascony:
47: Aquitaine: Slightly moved the city of Bordeaux. Very, very minor. Could be renamed to Bordelais, although I personally don't mind its current name all too much.
48: Labourd: Nothing has changed.
49: Armagnac: Slightly adjusted the borders to make room for some other provinces. Also adjusted the location of the city of Auch a little bit.
50: Béarn: Lost some weight to the new province of Foix. It consists of the counties of Béarn + Bigorre.

The fourteenth state is the new state of Toulouse:
51: Toulouse: Shrunken a bit to make place for two new provinces. Also placed the city of Toulouse itself in a more correct position.
52: Foix: Finally. France's most-wanted and split from Béarn and parts of Toulouse (the capital city of Foix itself is located there). It's basically the counties of Comminges + Foix. Should definetely be included, as the Foix-tag shouldn't be releasable from Béarn if the city of Foix itself isn't even located there, as is the case in the current basegame.
53: Carcassonne:
Carcassonne-game.jpg
Okay, joke's on me. The fortress located in Narbonnais should be given to this province. Carcassonne had a massive, but old, fortress. Toulouse was a big and wealthy province, it can easily be split this way.

The fifteenth state is Languedoc:
54: Vivarais: Cut a small part from Auvergne and gave it to Vivarais to include Gévaudan (2), a county and a city which was a historical part of the Languedoc region. A separate new province would be too much, as this region was quite poor.
55: Montpellier: Nothing has changed.
56: Narbonnais: Slightly adjusted the border to make room for Carcassonne. The county was historically small, so it doesn't really matter much. Also made sure to put the city of Narbonne closer to the sea, as it's too much inland in the current basegame.

The last and sixteenth state is Provence:
57: Avignon: Nothing has changed.
58: Forcalquier: Put it in the correct position. The city is currently still in the position of Draguignan. Forcalquier, while not very populated, was a historical county, so it should definetely stay in-game. I tried to make the borders slightly bigger than its historical shape, because it would be too small and lineair otherwise.
Carte_provence_1125.png
59: Aix: Renamed Provence to Aix. Provence itself was a county on its own, but I decided to split it. Aix-en-Provence was the capital and is still a sizable city nowadays. But what about Marseille you might say, well, they're only 30km apart from each other and Marseille wasn't the capital. Reminder that this province should never be called Provence if the historical county of Provence is split. Moved the location of the city to the more correct location, too.
60: Toulon: Provence should at least have a well-developed harbor-city if Marseille isn't added, so Toulon fits that role perfectly. It grew quickly in size and fame during EU4's timeframe.

22: Verdun.
28: Mâcon.
29: Gray (optional).
31: Salins.
36: La Marche.
42: Bresse (optional, especially if Geneva gets added).
52: Foix.
53: Carcassonne.
60: Toulon.


EDIT: The latest dev-diary showed us the new French setup, I was quite sad to see that old provinces haven't been properly adjusted, even though this thread was made roughly 5 months before the dev-diary. Anyway, I hope the developers will still look at this map and adjust the cities.
index.php

1: Moved the capital and it should be renamed to Brest.
2: Moved the capital.
3: Moved the capital and it should be renamed to Saint-Malo.
4: Moved the capital (Angers, which is in the Maine-province) to the correct bank of the river, as the current capital is in the location of Saumur.
5: Moved the capital.
6: Moved the capital and it should be renamed to Rouen. Caux was a geographical entity without Rouen.
7: Moved the capital.
8: Moved the capital.
9: Moved the capital to the correct bank of the river.
10: Moved the capital (Soissons) to the correct position above the river and in the current Reims-province. The current capital is in the position of Compiegne.
11: Moved the capital.
12: Moved the capital.
13: Moved the capital.
14: Moved the capital to the correct bank of the river.
15: Auxerrois currently has a fortress as capital, but it should have Auxerre as capital; the city it was named after in the first place and more important.
16: Moved the capital.
17: Moved the capital to the correct bank of the river.
18: Moved the capital.
19: Moved the capital.
20: Moved the capital.
21: Moved the capital of Gueret and reshaped the province.
22: Moved the capital of Limoges (should be above that river) and reshaped the province.
23: Moved the capital to the correct bank of the river.
24: Moved the capital.
25: Moved the capital.
26: Moved the capital to the correct bank of the river.
27: Moved the capital closer to the river.
index.php

1: Annecy, although sizable nowadays, is barely located in the province and thus should be renamed to either Bugey (with the capital of Belley, which is already in the correct position) or to Bresse (with the capital of Bourg-en-Bresse, which is indicated by the red dot). The latter has my preference, as it was more important within the timeframe of EU4.
2: Geneve should be next to the lake.
 

Attachments

  • France Update (no numbers).jpg
    France Update (no numbers).jpg
    192,4 KB · Views: 6.920
  • France Update (numbered provinces).jpg
    France Update (numbered provinces).jpg
    248,3 KB · Views: 8.769
  • Savoy.jpg
    Savoy.jpg
    876,1 KB · Views: 6.916
  • dd_france (1).png
    dd_france (1).png
    1,2 MB · Views: 65
  • dd_geneva.png
    dd_geneva.png
    522,5 KB · Views: 3.648
  • dd_france (1).png
    dd_france (1).png
    1,2 MB · Views: 4.665
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Would a split of Occitan culture be considered acceptable? I meant to put more research into it, but for a while I've been looking at it and it seems like there shouldn't be much issue in breaking off at least Provençal, especially considering that Gascon (which is just another dialect of Occitan) already exists. What would your thoughts on this be?
 
Would a split of Occitan culture be considered acceptable? I meant to put more research into it, but for a while I've been looking at it and it seems like there shouldn't be much issue in breaking off at least Provençal, especially considering that Gascon (which is just another dialect of Occitan) already exists. What would your thoughts on this be?
It can be split into many different dialects, if need be. The question only is, where will we split it and how do we call it?
 
I was able to find a few maps of Occitan dialects. I know "language does not equal culture" but it is definitely a good place to start. I'll do some more reading on Occitan and see what I can find, but if there's anybody more familiar with it I encourage them to contribute.

occitania1.jpg
20180421_wom921.png
Idioma_occitano_dialectos.png
 
I see France with more provinces than Iberia.

In fact, to put France with 80 provinces and more than 20 states, and would not all can be integrated as states.

France should have a mechanism that gave minimal autonomy or some system that would make it weaker, until with the arrival of absolutism the country could be eliminated and centralized.

And already have a strong France, and the rest of countries that have allied or have worked.

To me now to see a France with 60 provinces and 150 more development or 100 that Iberia
(by religious orders) seems ridiculous.

It is antihistorical and anti-jeopardy.

France between 1450-1600, maybe I should fight against itself.
Between 1600-1650, centralize.

And then, if that, overwhelm.
 
I see France with more provinces than Iberia.

In fact, to put France with 80 provinces and more than 20 states, and would not all can be integrated as states.

France should have a mechanism that gave minimal autonomy or some system that would make it weaker, until with the arrival of absolutism the country could be eliminated and centralized.

And already have a strong France, and the rest of countries that have allied or have worked.

To me now to see a France with 60 provinces and 150 more development or 100 that Iberia
(by religious orders) seems ridiculous.

It is antihistorical and anti-jeopardy.

France between 1450-1600, maybe I should fight against itself.
Between 1600-1650, centralize.

And then, if that, overwhelm.
I don't understand your point?
 
I don't understand your point?

That I think few provinces for France.

And that France should be a "monster" that must be formed or created.

But with time, so that 1500 do not eat half Europe.
 
Haven't read through all of this (and won't until after I come back from vacation) but this looks like a very solid suggestion that takes many of the best elements of suggestions that have come before. My only concern at a glance is that the shift in density and province shapes from Burgundy to France is a little jarring. Southern France is right on the money. Verdun is a big maybe, probably best considered alongside German map changes.
 
A state can never have just two provinces, that's why Mâcon could be given to this state (even if not part of this region, it wouldn't be the first time such a thing happens).

Actually, it can: Faroes, Iceland and Cabo Verde are such cases. Maybe St Helena is paired up in a double province state too? mb South Georgia or Lesser Namaqualand? Not sure on this one. I would prefer a 3 province state though, you made a good case.

Why did you not include Calais? Was it removed from the France area?

I think Savoie, if not Savoie AND Bresse have a solid argument for being mountains.

I think you also didn't discuss trade goods/terrain on your provence split. Maybe Aix would have an argument for Farmlands/wine and Toulon Hills/Naval supplies?

Same thing for Carcassonne. Surely it's gonna be wine producing, what would be the terrain though? Mountains?
 
If there's anything of note, please let me know!

You're using false background map which makes some regions look bigger than they actually were, and some smaller.
As example single Dauphine province was 20k km2 size, which is about the same as all French Provence (4 provinces in your map), or Burgundy (4 provinces of yours, not counting Nevers). On your map Dauphine doesn't look big and instead you decide to split "big" Charolais province, which actually isn't that big if map was made correct.
Easy to see real size of historical provinces in this map:
ca56ffb6223e8967b477be55de7d2340.jpg
All I wish that somebody could make map which would look at least a bit similar to the historical one.

I like split of Franche Comte, I like Foix area, but with Verdun you're moving Barrois into region what was Champagne. I think Verdun is really unnecessary.
And central France is completely forgotten by you.
Dauphine, Auvergne, Loire, Champagne and even Normandy (in very strange shape btw) beg for something to be done there.
Maybe this map could help a little what could be added in central France (divisions of Duchy Bourbonnais):
Duchés_de_Bourbon_et_Auvergne_sous_Charles_III.jpg

At least Forez and Aurillac surely can be added.
 
You're using false background map which makes some regions look bigger than they actually were, and some smaller.
As example single Dauphine province was 20k km2 size, which is about the same as all French Provence (4 provinces in your map), or Burgundy (4 provinces of yours, not counting Nevers). On your map Dauphine doesn't look big and instead you decide to split "big" Charolais province, which actually isn't that big if map was made correct.
Easy to see real size of historical provinces in this map:
View attachment 435532
All I wish that somebody could make map which would look at least a bit similar to the historical one.

I like split of Franche Comte, I like Foix area, but with Verdun you're moving Barrois into region what was Champagne. I think Verdun is really unnecessary.
And central France is completely forgotten by you.
Dauphine, Auvergne, Loire, Champagne and even Normandy (in very strange shape btw) beg for something to be done there.
Maybe this map could help a little what could be added in central France (divisions of Duchy Bourbonnais):
View attachment 435537
At least Forez and Aurillac surely can be added.
A false background map? I literally used Paint over an EU4 screenshot... Sure, the EU4-map might have some strange proportions, but don't accuse me of spreading misinformation.

I saw no good case for a split of regions like Dauphiné. If you have a good argument for it, please let me know. Many of these provinces stayed the same size during the EU4 timeline into the Napoleonic age, I don't just look at 1444.

This is a conservative take on the region (except for the Burgundian and HRE part), as I don't expect the developers to completely redo the region again. They have kind of pointed towards this themselves, too.

EDIT: Wait a sec... The map you posted is from Deviantart...?
https://www.deviantart.com/nanwe01/art/Map-of-the-Kingdom-of-France-622165224
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't France get their vassal swarm back but change the rules for their vassals so it's not over powered? This would mean France is trying to centralise for the first part of the game then they can start being the big power of Europe.
 
Shouldn't France get their vassal swarm back but change the rules for their vassals so it's not over powered? This would mean France is trying to centralise for the first part of the game then they can start being the big power of Europe.
That gets discussed in another great suggestion somewhere around here on the suggestion-forum; I'm not really one well-versed in making game-mechanics.
 
I hope the developers don't forget to take a look at this thread to fix some borders and cities here and there (in the north, too). Burgundy is indeed a bit too ambitious maybe, but it could be used as an inspiration mostly.
 
Well, for me, the start is a homogenize the name of province, particulary when a province is defined by a city. For example, you have "Nantais" or "Rennais" and in another hand Alençon, Caen, and some other. But I unterstand that came from the duchy's name (Alençon, Evreux...).
In my opinion, it's better to call them with the -ais. Because, the name is relative to the city and the countryside around ("Nantais" is a shortcut to tell Pays nantais). In some case, we lost the connexion to the city like Charoles for Charolais, but it's rare.

About the different point, my comments :
  • 1 : yeah, I agree with the division of Leon & Cornouaille from Finistere
  • 5 : The province "Nantais" and Brittany stop nearly the South of Loire to the Vendée that eat a little Anjou (18) and Bas-Poitou (32) but i saw in some map that they have gone below
  • 29-31 : The proposal from developpers about the split of Franche-Comté is Besançon & Dole => if we follow the dioceses, it's Besançon and Saint-Claude
  • 40-41 : We tell that Dauphiné came until the Lyon's borders. The city was a big merchand place but I don't think it deserve a province.
  • 42 : Good Idea & Forez too
  • 53 : Agree. But i dislike the game =')
  • 59 : Great rivalry between the two cities (still there), take Arles. I think it depends which tradegood have the province
 
Well, for me, the start is a homogenize the name of province, particulary when a province is defined by a city. For example, you have "Nantais" or "Rennais" and in another hand Alençon, Caen, and some other. But I unterstand that came from the duchy's name (Alençon, Evreux...).
In my opinion, it's better to call them with the -ais. Because, the name is relative to the city and the countryside around ("Nantais" is a shortcut to tell Pays nantais). In some case, we lost the connexion to the city like Charoles for Charolais, but it's rare.

About the different point, my comments :
  • 1 : yeah, I agree with the division of Leon & Cornouaille from Finistere
  • 5 : The province "Nantais" and Brittany stop nearly the South of Loire to the Vendée that eat a little Anjou (18) and Bas-Poitou (32) but i saw in some map that they have gone below
  • 29-31 : The proposal from developpers about the split of Franche-Comté is Besançon & Dole => if we follow the dioceses, it's Besançon and Saint-Claude
  • 40-41 : We tell that Dauphiné came until the Lyon's borders. The city was a big merchand place but I don't think it deserve a province.
  • 42 : Good Idea & Forez too
  • 53 : Agree. But i dislike the game =')
  • 59 : Great rivalry between the two cities (still there), take Arles. I think it depends which tradegood have the province
It was not a proposal made by the developers, but by another in the community. ;)

I don't expect the developers to split Franche-Comté the way I did it, but they should closely look at the nomenclature and this thread if they want to do it.
 
Hello there,


19: Touraine: Nothing has changed here. I really wanted to squeeze Blois between Touraine and Orleanais, but it would result in a true mini-province, sadly. If you guys find a way, make it happen! It was a very important and populated region.
20: Orleanais: Nothing has changed here.

22: Verdun.
28: Mâcon.
29: Gray (optional).
31: Salins.
36: La Marche.
42: Bresse (optional, especially if Geneva gets added).
52: Foix.
53: Carcassonne.
60: Toulon.

If there's anything of note, please let me know!

Regarding Northern France, the devs stated more times they are satisfied with it's current province density, which I disagree a bit, since it should rather have a density closer England, Northern Italy or Germany, regarding it's importance and high population density, with some of the biggest cities in Europe back then.
They seem to deal with Lorraine later, separately from France, so I really hope they will add Verdun there, and rework the Trois-Evechés.
Splitting Rouen and Caux would make sense since Le Havre in Caux became one of the most important ports of France.
Also I feel like Champagne should get that one more province, probably Épernay or Chalons, and Nemours should be moved to this state.
Cornouaille and Montfort/Versailles might also be interesting additions.
Population density around 1600:
main-qimg-42383aa2eac4d8b3628266f9631cd397


Then I would like to point out that the borders around Orleans, Nemours, Auxerrois and Berry are not too accurate right now. With a proper redraw of the Orleans province (which includes a slight shift towards east in the expense of Berry, which didn't stretch so far up north), we can have a more than decent Blois, and don't have to worry about the size.
Somehow like this:
46110088d94ea45334967d621cac9cf1ac789f0792c22605ada46183b3fa924394efd72c.jpg

(Colours represent the importance in my opinion. Red=must have, yellow=better representation, green=flavour)

Regarding the Southern France, I love Bresse(Bugey), La Marche, Foix, Carcassone and Toulon and they got a positive feedback from the devs, but I'm not sure about Franche-Comté. Surely it's very large, probably the biggest province in Western Europe, but:
-it always changed hands as one unit.
-even until this day it has a low population density, by western european standards
-despite these if it has to be divided into several province i would prefer to see Montbéliard over Gray and Salins, or the above mentioned Dole-Besancon division.

I would also love to see Forez, as if the vassals of France get a rework, then Bourbon lands should be represented accurately, but I don't see a reason for adding Aurillac, I think Auvergne just fine right now.
Adding Gévaudan and especially Aunis could also be interesting, though their addition would render Saintonge and Vivarais to be too small, probably.

Those are my thoughts on France, looking forward for your response, and keep up the good work, I like your suggestions a lot :)
 
Last edited: