-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
better control of forces, multi-front control (great for USA, one does pacific, other does europe) or for german 1944 (one west front one east front) but as far as raw bonuses, nothing, its just two guys using the same nation
Maulanator3 said:
It's also great as the USSR - hard to manage hundreds of divisions along a huge front (not to mention air forces) as one player, especially when you're being blitzed.
Craz said:
The way I did it in the past was have one person in charge of the sliders and put the other person in charge of, say, research.
But it is annoying when you are invading someone, and then the other player in control takes the army you have and send it somewhere else, leaving the front open.
yoy, if the guy you are cooping with is that uncoordinated.... why the hell did you do it in the first place?
Maulanator3 said:
Listen, you don't freeking find out how uncoordinated they are until they screw up Barbarossa AND Sealion at the same time.
