- Dec 14, 1999
- 22.069
- 262.506
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Johan map flexing.
The cities look much better and realistic size now. And the water stunning
The cities look much better and realistic size now. And the water stunning
- 23
- 8
That said...
Lovely city sprawl right there, the city size is just enough to give the sense of the vastness of the nation yet still being so detailed.
Love to see the new city change personally.
Lovely city sprawl right there, the city size is just enough to give the sense of the vastness of the nation yet still being so detailed.
Love to see the new city change personally.
- 31
- 18
.png){kind=avatar}
They haven't actually changed the size, they "re-arragnged" them to look more compact, look at Constantinople and Chalkedon here,The first one is before and the second one is after
It definetly looks better, but I still think that the building models(beside the harbours) could be smaller, I also think that most rural locations should have little to no building models on the map as it's nice to see swaths of empty land from time to time(maybe where there's low development)
Last edited:
- 29
- 3
- 2
- 2
Looks smaller to me. Are you not splitting hairs here?
- 12
- 6
- 2
I'm pretty sure, compare one of the buildings to a tree, it hasn't changed in size, before buildings used to be more distant from one another, now they are closer
- 14
- 2
- 1
Walls are completely fallen though, it must be just before they change the flag
- 1
B.. b.... but the buildings looks smaller??? Also seems like the latter image contains way more buildings than the former.
Also notice the little farm buildings and port logs, they look way smaller than before.
- 11
- 2
Would it be too much to ask to add Golden Horn? It is a great protagonist in the fall of the city after all.
- 2