Some differences between CK III and CK II in this region:
Same independent Zoroastrian realms exist in the region (Gilan and Gurgan formerly Karen) but they have no event or special troops anymore. Special troops in CK II scenario gave them a fighting chance, would probably be worth considering doing the same for III.
Tahirids and Saffarids are at war on game start as they were in II but the Tahirids are the aggressors instead of the Saffarids and they seem to just White Peace out quickly with their inferior levies. Per CK II, I believe the Saffarids are supposed to be the aggressors.
Same independent Zoroastrian realms exist in the region (Gilan and Gurgan formerly Karen) but they have no event or special troops anymore. Special troops in CK II scenario gave them a fighting chance, would probably be worth considering doing the same for III.
Tahirids and Saffarids are at war on game start as they were in II but the Tahirids are the aggressors instead of the Saffarids and they seem to just White Peace out quickly with their inferior levies. Per CK II, I believe the Saffarids are supposed to be the aggressors.
- 2
- 1
Upvote
0