• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

MattyG

Attention is love.
15 Badges
Mar 23, 2003
3.690
1
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Deus Vult
  • Diplomacy
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
I have been working on changes to Eire and in doing so crafted an updated and more complex event for the

inheritance/succession in Wales. This led me to define better what was happening in Wales and this led backwards to its

Aberrated history. The principle point of departure takes place in 1372. England is on the verge of collapse, its wars on the

mainland against France having bankrupted the crown. Here is an exerpt from the REAL history ...

"Following the death of Llywelyn ap Gruffydd in 1282, Gwynedd along with the remainder of Wales came under the rule of the

king of England. Owain had a claim to the throne of Gwynedd, since he was a great-nephew of Llywelyn ap Gruffydd, grandson of

Llywelyn's brother Rhodri. Owain was a soldier who served in Spain, France, Alsace and Switzerland. He led a Free Company

fighting for the French against the English in the Hundred Years' War. While in French service he had good relations with

Bertrand du Guesclin and others and gained the support of Charles V of France.

In May 1372 in Paris, Owain announced that he intended to claim the throne of Wales. He set sail from Harfleur with money

borrowed from Charles V, but the expedition had to be abandoned when Charles decided that he needed Owain's services as a

soldier elsewhere. In 1377 there were reports that Owain was planning another expedition, this time with help from Castile.

The alarmed English government sent a spy, the Scot Jon Lamb, to assassinate Owain, which he did in July 1378 at the siege of

Mortagne sur Mer in Poitou."

Instead of turning back from his journey, Charles makes do (poorly) without his services and Owain lands at Aberystwyth and

makes his way north, gathering with him 350 longbowmen and twelve mounted knights. Owain attacked and took Harlech Castle,

which was pooly manned and unprepared for Owain's swift assault. The capture of Harlech, both a potent fortress and symbol of

English rule, prompted many Welsh lords to join his cause. Through the summers of 1373 - 1376 Owain was victorious in both

battle and siege and by the end of 1376 had consolidate all of northern Wales under his rule. The English made peace and

recognised Owain as the prince of Wales, both sides needing a period of calm to prepare for the next inevitable wave of

hostilities. For the English, a war against Wales to retake the north would never come. The civil war of 1388 - 98 focused

the resources of the doomed king of England far from Wales. Owain, aware of the impending rebellion by the Percy's and their

Scottish backers took the gamble of precipitating the conflict with a campaign in the late winter of 1388, heading into Powys

and the old Marcher lands. Owain was only partly successful. The disintegration of England during the reign of Henry IV was

underway, and the battle of Keel's Bridge was a victory, but Owain himself was killed.

Geraint ap Owain (Owain's son by marriage to the daughter of the king of Munster) claimed the throne, but was forced to

return to Gwynedd to suppress a counter claim by Dafydd ap Ieuan, another of Llywelyn's descendents. Geraint was a less

capable commander than his father, but a superior diplomat. Owain gained the support of both the Eirean High king and the

newly crowned King of Brittany, both recognising him as Prince. Nonetheless, under Geraint Powys was conquered and Chester

captured. It would fall to Geraint's son Andras to conquer the south of Wales. Andras, outnumbered by Scottish and Yorkist

troops descending upon Chester, used swift-running longbowmen to slow their approach and to enable Andras' troops to

establish a strong defensive position behind the River Weaver. In the ensuing battle the outnumbered Welsh defeated the Scots and Yorkish army, enabling Andras to continue his march south to Cardydd. Andras faced the Scots and Yorkmen again two years later, this time near Oswestry. Andras' longbowmen made the difference, slaughtering horses and causing a confusion wherein the allied Eire cavalry cut a swathe through their opponents. Andras pressed on, defeating the Yorkmen again near birmingham and later capturing the city.

Under pressure from Henry's army to the south, the Scots made peace, recognising Andras as Prince of Wales and ceding to them the country west of there.

And so we find ourselves in 1419. Andras is old, but still capable, soon to die and leave the throne to his son Owain ap Andras. Owain will die childless, precipitating the succession crisis that may draw in Scotland and then Eire.

Note that I have also suggested in the Elite Units thread that the Welsh get Elite Longbowmen.

Thoughts?
 
That looks fine and makes quite a lot of sense, perhaps you want to drag Brittany into the inheritance question as you have said that they also supported the Prince of Wales.
 
Scotland would not inherit Wales and nor would Eire.

If Scotland presses its claim, it goes to war with Wales and gets cores there. It does not inherit it, but has to fight a fesity Camredd to win them. Plus, if they do press their claim and go to war, then they will likely drag Eire in on Wales' side, the A action for Eire. Eire might leave it all alone, or might ALSO go to war on Walkes, pressing its claim. But there is no inheritance per se. Of course, Scotland could anyway at any time attack and conquer Wales, right? But this gives it cores there, but forces it into a war that may not be convenient. Ditto Eire.

Brittany is an interesting case. I agree that they should have an option to get involved, if that's how we conceive of them. I was going to write more on this and will do so in the next few days. The thing is that although they initially support an independent Wales, subsequent events may have placed them at loggerheads. Such that at game start we have just had a war finish that pitted Scotland and York versus Wales backed by Eire and Wessex backed by Brittany (and Normandy).

The other thing is that Brittany may chose a very different path. Brittany does not have the strength to get involved in both the British Isles AND the continent, and the serious events of the continent may trigger earlier and be more pressing. That depends partly on what Burgundy does, but Brittany may press its own weak claim on France and go in that direction and not wish to get involved in events in the British Isles.

MattyG
 
Absolutely. France will be able to be formed by Burgundy, Bourbonnais, Orleanais, Guyenne and Auvergne, but not by Brittany. However, through marriages, Brittany will get events that give it cores in (eventually) all French culture provinces. Assuming it makes the right choices and is successful.

Alternatively, it will make a decision to go north and can try and make a Greater Breton.