• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
Still haven't been able to play the latest version of this but I must say that from what I've played of the second newest one this is great! :D
One thing though:
The later parts of EU2 saw the comming of nation states and such with more centralized states and so on, shouldn't for instance the union of Kalmar and the Hanseatic League get options to reshape themselves into some sort of kingdoms/nations as the game commences (if it's not in allready admitedly I've not played the latest version and I've not yet finnished my entire first game as the UoK). With the current settup I kind of get the feeling of being stuck in the middle ages as time commences, wouldn't the kings, leaders, etc of the union have tried to create a more modern nation state given the opertunity rather than a union of states? (possibly with a brand new cool flag as well ;) and probably with some conditions along the lines of having to have reconquered norway for instance)
Same with the hanseatic league, if it's expanded into a real state, wouldn't a change of the constitution from a union of merchant cities have been in order?

Also norway seems a bit too weak to me in the july 9th beta (but that depends really on how powerfull you want it to be I suppose).

Again, great scenario, I love alternate history! :D
 
In both my Sp games so far bavaria conquered all of germany and in the first one they also conquered most of eastern europe all the way to moscow (in my second game the chose to anex all of Italy instead)...

I was playing Byzantium in both games and focusing mostly on the middle east.
 
It seems there's some bug and/or some illogical design in the Sund Crisis (Hansa)

the events are:
200206
200208
200209
in major_hsa.txt

and
200207
in minor_rag.txt


The first is that the Sund crisis triggers a Ragusan event (200207) that is supposed to happen in 1503

the second is that the first event for the sund crisis triggers the "win" event right away, doesn't that mean it won't trigger afterwards ?

further, the "lost" event requires the "won" event to have happened :confused:
EDIT: the "lost" event (200209) also speaks of Jylland, while the whole war seems to revolve around Sjaelland
 
Last edited: