• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(31994)

Zardishar
Jul 15, 2004
1.085
0
BAL09769.jpg

Caliphal Parade in Cordoba​


A quick history lesson for those of you unenlightened by Arab history...Ahem

The mutilated elderly Caliph Al-Hakam II, son of the great Abdul Rahman III reigns over a powerful and prosperous Kingdom spanning all of Iberia with the exception of Galicia and Asturias. He appoints Abi Amar, the ambitious and michavellian son of Tarifa as minister of the 'Mint' and eventually as a Minor Vizier(Hes one of the most devious characters in Arabic history, a rags to richers story, manipulating rivalries and gaining more power from the death of his enemies). Abi Amar court's the confidance of the 'Umm Al-Walad' or 'Mother of the Son' - the Wife of the Caliph and mother to Hisham II. Abi Amar then isolates his enemies, namely the Saqaliba(European Enunchs) by organizing a riot in Cordoba and humiliating the heads of the Major Noble Houses in the city. He also gains the support of the Royal Army during Al-Hakam's reign against the Saqaliba when he goes to Morocco to aid Abu Ghalib, the Grand Marshal of the Caiphate. When Al-Hakam II dies, the 30 year old Minister assumes the regency of the country with the support of Umm Al-Walad(There was a conspiracy to install Mughira, the brother of Al-Hakam rather than his 12 year old son - the Saqaliba[Under the Master of the Wardrobe and Master Falconer] were the instigators - it was the chance Abi Amar siezed to eliminate them completely). He then turns to other adversaries, namely Mushafi and Ibn Ghalib. He accuses Mushafi of nepotism and squandering state funds(Abi Amar was appointed Sahib al-Medina or Mayor of Cordoba through Umm Al-Walad by the recommendation of Ibn Ghalib). A council is made to investigate matters(A farce) and the Prime Minister is thrown in Jail - he dies five years later. Though he used the aid of Abu Ghalib against Mushafi(Both were at bad terms with each other over who was the rightful ruler of the Mawlas), Abi Amar moved against his ally. The Regent prepares an army of Berber and Christian mercenaries and goes off to end Abi Ghalib. They first meet in Medinceli(Abi Amar must have wanted to assasinate him) but a brawl broke out between the two, and the armies clashed. Abu Ghalib dies in a freak accident as the sharper part of his saddle kills him - fate huh?The greatest Marshal of the Middle Ages in Spain dies from an accident...His Mawla commanders then surrender to Abi Amar in exchange for amnesty as without Abu Ghalib there was no point in continuing the battle(There were some Mawla Sheiks and Lords who wanted to elect a new leader to resist Abi Amar, but they failed - all were hanged in the Medina Al-Zahra as traitors to the Caliph Hisham). With his adversaries eredicated, Abi Amar returns to Cordoba in victory and assumes total control of the Caliphate(Well, he was still called Prime Minister, but he was the real power in the state). Muhammad Abi Ammar 'Al-Mansur' locks the vegetated Caliph Hisham II in the Palace(Not that Hisham was concerned anyway) and takes the Kingdom to new heights in culture, wealth and military might. He is famously known for leading his army in many campaigns(52 in all) against the Christians, capturing all the northern cities, and sacking Santiago de Compostella(He destroyed the Cathedral, took it's Bell, and melted it to be used as a chandelier for Cordoba's Grand Mosque!) though he never maintained an enduring occupation. When he passed away, his son Abdul Malik 'Al-Dhafir' took over the mantle of Grand Vizier and continued to undermine Caliph Hisham, and upon his unexpected death (he died at 33) Sanjool(Arabic for Sancho) 'Abdul Rahman', the youngest offspring of Abi Amar took control after the death of his brother Abdul Malik. Since Abdul Rahman lacked the guile and intelligence of both his father and brother, the Ummayed Princes, the European Enunchs, and the Nobility in Cordoba rose up in rebellion against him in a bid to 'truly' restore the Caliph. Rioters and Sympathetic citizens gathered outside the Medina Al-Zahra appealing to the Caliph to save the Kingdom - but Hisham II was more intrested in his prayers, his antique collection, and going over his father Al-Hakam's extensive library - he had no time for the affairs of the 'Rayias'.Sanjool was captured outside of the city with his lover Count Bertolemeo trying to escape - both were executed. Then, confused fighting started between the factions in Cordoba, with the Nobility ripping itself apart and the Caliph Hisham II, who for so long was detached from the realities of his post (A vegetable as Id like to call him) doing nothing to end the bloodshed! In the midst of this fighting the Caliph disappears - supposedly either killed or kidnapped, and the fighting grew worse between the Ummayeds as each Claiment to the throne was quickly culled by others who coveted it(Around 30 ascended the throne - all of whom were killed). To make matters worse, the Berber mercenary soldiers revolted under Zingid bin Ziri, the Captain of the Guard, and sacked the Medina al-Zahra as well as the Zahir(built by Abi Amar al-Mansur) - some of the greatest palaces in Muslim Spain and took control of the districts and colonies beyond the Guadlaquivar (Wad al-Kabir). The Banu Angelino and Tartagosa families, the most respected Muslim Gothic houses at the time organized their supporters and servents to engage the Berbers and suppress them with the help of the remnants of the Hazar Army(Most of the army melted away due to Sanjool's bad budgeting - he didnt pay the soldiers a full pay). By 1031, the time of the Caliph's mysterious 'disappearance' the Caliphate basicaly ended - Cordoba, the greatest city in Western Europe was engulfed in flames. In response to this chaos and the lack of a central authority, the country fragmented into 35 small Taifa princedoms - with the Banu Abbad(The strongest of the princlings) taking over Seville and her environs, the Banu Al-Aftas in Badajoz and Lisbon, the Banu Hud in Zaragozza(In the second and 3rd Taifa periods they would remerge in Valencia and Murcia), the Dil Nun in Toledo, the Ziri(Relatives of the Berber Captain) in Granada, and the Banu Jahwar in Cordoba(the city would eventually be absorbed by the Bani Abbad). Whilst the Taifa period is a time of political disunity for the Muslims, it is also a time of cultural brilliance and splendor. Some of the greatest poets, artists and thinkers of Al-Andalus emerge at this hectic epoch, circulating around the many 'golden' courts of Seville, Toledo, Zaragossa and others. The Christians at this time make headway and capture Toledo in 1085, Valencia in 1094(By El-Cid! But it is recaptured in 1102 I think by the Almoravids..) and Zaragossa in 1118. The Christians grow bold and demand tribute from the Muslim princlings. Mutamid bin Abbad, the poet King of Seville, after having exhausted every option, turns to the Almoravids of Northern Africa for help - he is attributed for saying "I would rather be a camel rider in Africa than a pig herder in Castile". Yusuf bin Tashfin, the puritan warrior, comes to Al-Andalus and defeats the Christians in Zallaca. He wanted to continue persuing the Christians to the North and ending their threat once and for all, but business in Africa forces him to go back. He returns five years later and, finding that the Andalusi princlings have done nothing to stem the tide or make headway, decides to annex the Muslim emirates and absorb them into his empire. He is succesful in his endeavor and for the first time since the arrival of the Muslims in Iberia, Al-Andalus was rendered into nothing but a province in a North African Empire. Anyway, to make things short, the Almohads come afterwards - they defeat the Almoravids in Africa and then move against them in Spain. They rule up to 1212 when the battle of Navas de Tolosa breaks them. The third Taifa(the second one was a short era following the fall of the Almoravids in Spain) period emerges with Mohammed al-Ahmar of Arjona taking over Granada(and thus forming the future Nasrid state), Ibn Hud ruling Murcia, and Abu Mahfouz in Hulieca & Niebla(Cordoba and Seville circulating around these three guys). Oh and Valencia was also a free Moorish state for a while as well until Aragon ended that...

The Kingdom of Granada emerges somewhere around 1237 and falls in 1492. 255 years, which is quite impressive considering it's somewhat tiny size in comparison to her neighbours - there were of course many reasons that permitted her to survive for so long...though they were also the same factors that impeded the Kingdom from expanding and recapturing Muslim territory.

So as anyone can see, the current setup makes very little sense and even my own attempt to explain how the Nasrids came to power is very weak. The Banu Ahmar, if the Caliphate had survived, would have continued to be rich farmers in Arjona and Baeza with no intrest in the affairs of Cordoba. Muhammed al-Ahmer was a man thrusted into the drama of the reconquesta by the circumstances of the era...and not by some divine will. He would have prefered to be a "Sayid A'mazra'ah"(Lord of a Farmland) than a King. Also, the reunification of the Caliphate after the Taifa period or after the Almoravid/Almohad occupation is somewhat unplausible - no native Andalusi would have been able to conquer all the Muslim Emirdoms AND deal with the Christians at the same time - only an outside power could accomplish this...unfortunitly, North Africa had been in decline from the 13th century due to demographic, political and economic stagnation. Also, all North African regimes had been overly orthodox which complicated their rule of the relaxed society in Al-Andalus and thus couldnt endure for long.

Ive expanded upon the late Ummayed era and the first Taifa in hopes of finding a possible turning point in Moorish history in Iberia. One has to remember that the Ummayed dynasty was greatly respected by all the denziens of Al-Andalus, an emotion that has endured up to the last Moorish expulsion in 1609. They were the equivilant of the Abbasids, the 'Holy'dynasty. They were viewed as the saviors of Muslim Iberia (Abdul Rahman I 'Al-Dhakil' founded the Ummayed Emirate after fleeing from Syria during the great purging of the Ummayeds by the Abbasids in the east. Spain was in chaos and the Viceroys were ineffective, Abdul Rahman changed all that so he was seen as the savior) and the greatest of her rulers (Al-Hakam I, Abdul Rahman II, Abdul Rahman III, Hisham II).

I would suggest this:

Interegnum History

Abi Amar was killed in the Maghrib by the rebel forces of Abi Kan'oun(Governor of Morocco who constantly shifted sides between the Fatamids and the Ummayeds) outside of Eagle's Fortress(Now in Ceuta) and thus had no influence over the education and upbringing of Caliph Hisham II(Who was quite intelligent). Al-Hakam II passes away, and Hisham II, the child, is crowned ruler with the Prime Minister Mushafi relegated to the regency (He was a close friend to Al-Hakam, and was quite loyal to the Ummayed house - at good terms with Umm Al-Walad as well though he had some strained relations with the Mawlas, even though he was one...long complicated story). The court is heavily influenced by Mawlas, Saqaliba, and Arab Nobles. The Ummayeds continue to reign in Spain and become something like an 'ancient' dynasty with very rigid European/Arab customs(The Caliph never really making any decisions - like the Abbasids under the Baramika or Seljuks). Somewhere around the middle of the 13th century, during the many frequent campaigns against the Christians, Barcelona is captured and the border is pushed a bit upward. As time progresses the Caliphate, regardless of her ups and downs, becomes the only natural feature in Iberia, a sort of 'Muslim State' like say France, England or even Byzantium - an enduring political body. One could say that the Christians would have tried to expand, and I agree, the development of better infrastructure and communication with Europe strengthened them - but the break up of France in Interegnum would have ended any sustained resistance. The Christian Kings would have opted for small scale raiding and maintaining the never serious oath of loyalty to the Caliph.

Another possible alternative, is that the Saqaliba successede in their conspiracy and install Mughira(The conspirators agreed he wouldnt be Caliph, just a 'Regent' until Hisham came of age - it was the will of Caliph Al-Hakam to have his son take the throne after him and the Saqaliba werent ready to disobey their 'dead' Master - they were very loyal to the Ummayeds). The 'Fityan Medinat Al-Zahra' or our blonde haired blue eyed enunchs would then strike a deal with the Master of the Mawla Soldiers Yahya bin Thermidor, who was already at odds with Mushafi .The Prime Minister is executed in his Mansion the Al-Mushafiyya. They dispatch a party of Soldiers from the al-Hazar to execute Abi Amar, but the willy Vizier flees to a safehouse held by his allies(Perhaps his friend the Sahib al-Shurta - The Police Cheif Ibrahim?). He turns to the Rayis and, using his silver tongue, calls for a general insurrection against the Saqaliba, claiming they were going against the will of Al-Hakam and jeapordizing the line of Bani Ummayah.On day break with the morning prayers, the Saqaliba declare their decision (Actually, in more antiquated times, the Saqaliba were the ones who chose the Caliphs, so it wasnt really uncommon - more like a ressurection of old traditions) to the citizens of Cordoba and demand a Bay'ha(Payment of Allegiance) for Mughira as 'Hami Al-Khalif al-Muajal' (Protector of the Postponed Caliph). Rioting flares in the city, and the Uncles of Hisham try to convince Mughira to desist from his upsurption - but he is adament and sends for the Garrison in Ayen Al-Balut(the largest Military installation in the region that was held by the Suqlubis)to suppress the revolt with the aid of Yahya bin Thermidor. By noon, the riot is suppressed and Abi Amar is captured. The Umm Al-Walad, Subh, having been locked in her room, had remained largely in the dark at the events transpiring outside the Medina al-Zahra. Abi Amar is exeucted and a Bay'ha is arranged for Mughira. The Umm Al-Walad of course, is furious, but could do nothing, and accepts the situation, as do the other brothers of Mughira, who wanted to see Hisham on the throne.

The Caliphate continues very much as before, though Mughira is somewhat of a puritan. He dies in 1012(Made up date since he was killed in RL) and Hisham assumes the throne as an acceptable monarch. The next 4 centuries will take some time, but considering the great prosperity and economic development of Andalucia, as well as the soldification of the Central authorities, it's not far fetched. People actually LOVED the Caliphate. There was a saying in the Taifa times actually "Ayna Ayamu Qurtuba Qatiba?Arjihi wa Abghi!"Where are the days of the Uniting Cordoba?Return and Endure!


North Africa

Since the Ummayeds have jumped ship from North Africa ever since the victory of Abi Kanoun(Who in RL was very close to success in declaring independance but was foiled by the interferance of Abi Amar who accompanied Abu Ghalib per the request of the wily Vizier - Abi Kanoun, having lost all his allies by the silver tongue of the Vizier surrendered and accompanied Abu Ghalib to Cordoba, where he was granted amnesty...he later backstabs the Ummayeds and goes back to Morocco but fails yet again to disengage from the influence of Fustat or Cordoba) North Africa should have a completely different dynasty sequence... perhaps the Zenata replacing morocco and tlemscen staying as it is. Something like a backyard for the Spanish Caliphate and Egypt.
 
Calipah,

This is very interesting stuff to read. It reminds me again how little we in the west know about the history of the Islamic world. It is basically ignored in school history and none of the great stories and characters from this period (except Salah al-Din) make any appearance in popular culture.

Where does this leave us? I hope this amounts to mostly cosmetic changes. We are very late in Interregnum's development and I wouldn't want to rebuild Al-Andalus at this point! :cool:

Please let me know what YOU would like to see happen and send or write down all the changes that are required.

MattyG
 
Well, It will be a basic restructuring of Al-Andalus but retaining many of the events already there - definite dynasty change to the Ummayeds to really cement the Muslim rivalry between the Mutazelites and the Sunnis in the form of the ancient rivalry of the Abbasids and Ummayeds.

It will be fun...and it will cull alot of the dynasty changes and make Al-Andalus look a bit more splendorous.

By the way, do you still have the Mameluke files I sent you?You still didnt give me any feedback by the way :p
 
Last edited:
Calipah said:
Well, It will be a basic restructuring of Al-Andalus but retaining many of the events already there - definite dynasty change to the Ummayeds to really cement the Muslim rivalry between the Mutazelites and the Sunnis in the form of the ancient rivalry of the Abbasids and Ummayeds.

It will be fun...and it will cull alot of the dynasty changes and make Al-Andalus look a bit more splendorous.

By the way, do you still have the Mameluke files I sent you?You still didnt give me any feedback by the way :p


The mameluke files ... you asked me to send them back to you a few months ago so you could work on them again. And I haven't heard from you since! :( So, if you have sent something in the last four months, I did not receive it.

When you have the new material done for Al-Andalus it will be my please to update the files.

And, dear friend, will you one day complete Morocco? :D
 
13th Century

Following the collapse of the Almohad empire in 1212 and the disastrous advance of the Kingdoms of Castile, Portugal and Aragon, Al-Andalus phased into her third Taifa period which saw the rise of four principal princedoms - the Kingdom of Murcia under Ibn Hud, the enclave of Niebla under Sheik Ibn Mahfouz, the Emirdom of Valencia under Al-Mardanish, and the Statelet of Granada & Arjona under Muhammed Al-Ahmer. The strongest of the four was Ibn Hud, who, through a combination of political maneuver and Military pressure, brought the major cities of Muslim Spain, namely Cordoba and Seville, under the sphere of his influence and forced the surrounding Taifas to pay allegiance to his crown. To rally the people and further enhance his legitimacy, he recognized the Caliph of Baghdad as his liege, and in turn, was designated with the honorary title 'Protector of Al-Andalus' by the gracious Abbasid Caliph Al-Mutaqi II.

However, regardless of the initial successes of Ibn Hud to create cohesive new authority in Al-Andalus after the retreat of the Almohads, most of the Muslim holdings in the peninsula were under determined Christian assault by the third decade of the 13th century. In the East of Al-Andalus the Aragonese under King James sieged Valencia (1238) and managed to capture the city before help could arrive. Though Al-Mardanish managed to escape, he met his fate near Denia when brigades attacked his entourage to Murcia. To the West, the Sheik's holdings of Niebla, Huelva and Gibraleon were threatened by zealous Portuguese Almughavors and knights. The willy Sheik yeilded Eastern Algarve to the Christians in a protracted retreat, only manning the garrisons of the Gyadirya Castles with skeletal forces and applying a scorched earth policy to the outlaying towns and villages in an effort to postpone the Christian advance on his main stronghold. He used the time he gained to marshal his forces and send for help from North Africa. By spring he crossed the Guadiana with a strong army and soundly defeated the Christians near Merlola in 1237. The Mudejar Muslims in Silves and Oksonoba revolted and Ibn Mahfouz managed to reconquer all of South Western Algarve. The Sheik then turned to Beja, where he met a large Portuguese force under the leadership of King Alfonso III. The battle of 'Almizra'(1239) ended with mutual defeat, and Alfonso conceded a cease fire to the Moorish Sheik.

In the fertile Guadlaquivar, the armies of King Ferdinand III were already deep in Muslim territory and have already captured the towns of Andujar(1231),Zamora(1232),Ayen Al-Balut(1232),Lahira(1233) and Mugrabiya(1233), pushing the border of Castile to the outskirts of Cordoba herself. Whilst having an army of inferior number and quality than the Christians, Ibn Hud could not ignore the threat to the fertile basin and decided to meet King Ferdinand in the battlefield head on. He turned to his vassal, Muhammad Al-Ahmer(Both Ibn Mahfouz and Al-Mardanish were already absorbed in repelling the Christian advances in their own dominions and could not afford sending away their troops) for support. Whilst Al-Ahmer was not adament on betraying his liege, he was not willing to come about as being a renegade and a coward to his subjects and immediatly took helm of his troops and rendevouzed with Ibn Hud's army near Ecija.

Meeting the far superior Castillian forces on Damhat Al-Arus(A hill near Cordoba), Ibn Hud opted for a 'khar wa far'(Hit and Run) strategy to harass the enemy instead of direct confrontation. His assaults and ambushes proved to be a success but his good fortune expired when a stray arrow pierced his tunic and killed him instantly. Al-Ahmer immediatly took command and decided to engage the enemy. The ferocity of the clash reached a fevered pitch and when the tide of the battle began to tilt in favour of the Christians, Muhammad rallied his Jinete Cavalry and charged at the Castillian army, resulting in many deaths amongst whom were King Ferdinand III. The capture of the sacred banner of Santiago by a brave Berber spearmen decided the outcome of the battle and the Christian soldiers began to give way to a full fledged retreat. The courage and valor Muhammad al-Ahmer demonstrated earned him the title of 'Al-Nasir'(The Upholder) and the great victory was forever remembered in the chornicles of history as "La conquesta de la Nasiri". The descendents of his bloodline would hence be called 'Nasrids'.

The triump had two favourable outcomes - the neutralization of the Castillian offensive with the death of King Ferdinand III and the elimination of Al-Nasir's liege Ibn Hud, which in turn meant that Muhammad Al-Ahmer had an emancipated hand over the Guadlaquivar and free to persue his aspirations to establish a Kingdom of his own. He rapidly captured Cordoba and Seville with the help of sympathizers(the Banu Pechu & Yahwar), and eventually extended his rule throughout much of Andalucia, using at times very dubious means wherever nessicary to bring the princlings and governors of Al-Andalus to heel. By 1240 he controlled most of Guadliquivar and her environs. His aspirations however, were contested by three other monarchs in Southern Spain, namely Ibn Mahfouz of Niebla(Who declared a free Sheikdom following the death of Ibn Hud and began to move eastward, capturing Alnacaxar and Brenas in 1240) King James of Aragon, and Al-Wathiq of Murcia, the son of the infamous Ibn Hud.

Since the latter two were already embroiled in conflict, Al-Ahmer, turned his attention to Ibn Mahfouz, whos recent victories against the Portuguese brought him a great deal of power and wealth in the west of the peninsula. Suprising the garrison of Alnacaxar in a daring night attack, Al-Ahmer opened hostilities with Ibn Mahfouz. Clashing in several skirmeshes, Al-Ahmer's more numerous forces soon gained the upper hand and swarmed over the Sheik's realm. Having lost everything but Niebla, Ibn Mahfouz turned the city to his redoubt and prepared for a long siege that endured for well over three years. After the surrender of Niebla, Ibn Mahfouz was exiled to Tlemcen, never to be heard of again. With the conquest of Algarve, Al-Ahmer was rightfully the sole ruler of all Muslim Andalucia(Al-Wathiq surrendered Murcia to King James the Conquerer in 1244, a few weeks before the end of the siege in Niebla).

Though Murcia was considered a rightful Castillian possesion, the civil war that wrecked the kingdom after the death of Ferdinand resolved the Aragonese monarch to retain his conquests and persue further territorial acquisitions in the Southern Tadmir(Murcia). Muhammad set out to halt the Aragonese forays into the eastern underbelly of his kingdom. In light of this, the Murcian landscape increasingly resembled the no-man lands that once existed between the Muslims and Christians during the days of the Ummayed Caliphate as towns constantly changed hands with typical razzias and skirmishes becoming the enduring characteristic of the marginalized conflict until 1248, when sparodic uprisings in Valencia forced King James to invest a portion of his troops to deal with the Mudejar revolts in the north. Al-Nasir gambled with the oppourtunity and successfully drove the Aragonese from Murcia and Alicante by the autumn of 1249. An uneasy peace was concluded between Aragon and the growing Nasrid state.

Stopping to draw breath after the terrible and destructive wars against the Christian States, Al-Nasir laboured unceasingly to consolidate his conquests and stabalize his rule over a vast Kingdom. He raised a large army and intiated a series of reforms that were aimed at centralizing the administration and forming a bureacracy linking the various provinces of the realm. After a decade of peace, Muhammad felt secure enough to persue further expansion aimed at reconquering the still densly populated Muslim towns and villages of the border. The Mudejar insurrection of 1264, though mostly limited to the Moors of La Mancha, Valencia and Extremadura, successfully ousted Christian rule from Alanye, Badajoz, Merdina, Medellan, the Sierra Morena, Denia and Xativa. Prior to the revolt, Muhammad had organized an alliance that included the Zayyanids of Tlemcen and Hafsids of Tunis(Both of whom were at odds with the Merdinands) and sycronized with the uprising, attacked - on both land and sea - the Christians of Aragon and Castile. Majorca, Ibiza and Palma, in that order, were captured by Muslim cossairs supported by the Zayyanid navy. The settlements that revolted in Old Castile soon came under assault from a Christian counter attack which managed to retake the Sierra Morena and the cities of the Guadiana. Al-Ahmer, now in command of a large army supported by his Zayyanid and Hafsid allies, defeated the disorganized Christians in several encounters(Alfonso X, the successor of Ferdinand III was still sternly opposed by the nobles in many quarters of his kingdom) and reoccupied the Mudejar towns of La Mancha as well as Badajoz. In the East, Muhammad II, the son of Al-Ahmer, led a large force to relieve the Muslims of Denia and Xativa. With volunteers pouring in from the countryside Muhammad not only retook the lower 'Banafsaj' but sieged Valencia herself, which he entered amidst great pomp and celebration from the local Mudejars in 1269.

The Christians of Iberia looked at alarm with the waning cause of Christ, as Toledo herself, a Christian city since 1085, was threatened following Al-Ahmer's conquest of Alcobra(1269) and Mora(1270). Neither Alfonso X of Castile or the dying James I of Aragon could halt the Moorish reconquesta. Luckily for them however, Muhammad Al-Ahmer died in October 18 1270 when a Christian zealot in Moorish robes stabbed him during a Ramadan Festivel held near Pedroynon.

The drive towards the heart of Iberia melted away, and the Zayyanids and Hafsids abandoned their allies due to renewed Merined expansion in North Africa. The Christians regrouped and staged a new offensive aimed at retaking the south. Whilst Castillian efforts were frustrated by Muhammad II and only achieved piecemeal pincing along the border, the Aragonese proved more successful, culminating in their recapture of Valencia in 1274. Muhammad II opened diplomatic channels with the Christians and concluded a truce that was broken twice in his 30 years of rule. However, his Military endeavors saw no great shifts along the border. His reign was devoted to strengthening the administration and overseeing Muslim resettlement across the frontier. He died in 1302.

14 Century

Amongst the nine Nasrid monarchs who ruled during the 14th century, two are worthy of notice - Yusuf I(1333-1354) and Muhammad V(1354-1391).

Yusuf I(1333-1354)

By the time Yusuf I ascended the throne the Nasrid Kingdom was at it's peak. Agriculture and trade had prospered greatly following the chaos & economic decline of the past century, and the Military of Nasrid Spain had become a much feared force in the peninsula. The long border stretching from Alcala del Sol(South of Lisbon) across the Guadiana river to Xativa was defended by a line of fortifications raised during the reigns of Muhammad III, Ismail I and Muhammad IV respectively and the Christian spirit devoted to the reconquesta seemed to have died down. Free of the internal unrest and the political opposition of rival claimants of which his predecessors suffered, Yusuf I was in a position to renew Nasrid expansion in Iberia(It is important to note that Yusuf I was obsessed with Gunpowder, and used Cannons extensively throughout his campaigns. His utilization of cannons proved decisive in defeating the Christians). He crossed the Guadiana in 1335 and attacked the towns of Guadalope and Trujillo simultanously, capturing them both in a matter of days. His invasion had caught Castile with surprise, and before a proper reaction could be mounted, Yusuf was aleady assaulting the walls of Talavera. Another force approached from the south east commanded by the brilliant general Nasir Al-Din Al-Qishtalli. Rapidly making its way north to Toledo the Qishtalli army left the walls of Santa Maria, Ucles and Huete battered and overrun. As the Moors converged on Toledo in the Autumn of 1336, King Alfonso XI appealed to Navarre, Aragon, and Portugal for aid.

The arrayed Christian armies merged in Segovia and marched to deal with the Moorish threat on Toledo. In an air reminiscent to the much famed battle of Navas de Tolosa that was fought a century ago, the Christians & Muslims clashed in an climatic encounter.'La Perdida de Espana' or 'The loss of Spain' in Anglophile sources forever crushed Christian arms in Iberia and restored Muslim rule once more to Toledo in 1336 - 251 years after the Christian take over.


To be continued....
 
Ok, I realized that the Ummayed thing was going to change alot of things...so I made this suggested History for Nasrid Spain...How does it sound?
 
MattyG said:
The mameluke files ... you asked me to send them back to you a few months ago so you could work on them again. And I haven't heard from you since! :( So, if you have sent something in the last four months, I did not receive it.

When you have the new material done for Al-Andalus it will be my please to update the files.

And, dear friend, will you one day complete Morocco? :D

I did resend you!A large file up to the rise of the Republic :eek:

Damn, and I seemed to have deleted it on my comp as well... :mad:

I am working on the new material of al-Andalus and will send it to you soon. As for Morocco.....well, inshallah one day! :D
 
Greetings!

I'm new to this!! Just came across your "quick history lesson", which I really enjoyed. Makes a change from reading about it in Spanish!! Would be really interested to know what your sources are/were. ARe you researching from the Arabic? - hope so.

Did you ever produce that other stuff on Al-Andalus,as I would love to read it.

Thanks
Tamarindos
 
Tamarindos,

Hopefully calipah will read your post. He's busy with studies these days and only checks in ocassionally.

Calipah is a genuine student of the muslim world of north africa and Iberia, but especially Iberia, meaning Al-Andalus. He's from Saudi Arabia, so yes a lot of his sources will have been from the original Arabic. A while back he finally got to visit Spain and was not disappointed with it's beauty. Calipah is also wonderfully fluent in English and speaks and writes with more eloquence than 95% of native speakers.

Hopefully you will get a chance to review the new Al-Andalus file and see what we have done with the alternative history. But there is a piece missing. A big piece, which is the world of non-Muslim Iberia. Galicia, Leon, Catalunya and Navarre are all pretty two-domensional at this stage. Any cool ideas on their alternate histories would be much appreciated.

Matty
 
Tamarindos said:
I'm new to this!! Just came across your "quick history lesson", which I really enjoyed. Makes a change from reading about it in Spanish!! Would be really interested to know what your sources are/were. ARe you researching from the Arabic? - hope so.

Did you ever produce that other stuff on Al-Andalus,as I would love to read it.

Thanks
Tamarindos

Thank you! Yes, I research in Arabic but also in English. I havent yet continued my fanciful work on al-Andalus - might resume once the semester ends though. Im aiming to compile the history of al-Andalus up to 2007 :p