I am wondering how Poland will be split up and if we could get a screenshot of Poland and the rest of Central/Eastern Europe...
AlexanderG said:There is no Poland. It is divided between the Pagans, the Germans and the Russians as it always was. Poland is a 20th century creation of British Imperialists.![]()
you are riggggghtkristoff said:Very funnyAs well as Spain was always divided between Basques, Catalonians, Castilians, Arabs and is a creation of Francisco Franco.
HolisticGod said:Kristoff,
That comparison is a bit daft, as Spain was, in fact, always divided between Basques, Catalonians, Castilians and Arabs, and as a nation state is at the very least the product of the Civil War, if not (unpleasently) Franco himself.
QUOTE]
Well, that's what I exactly ment. Thanx for support, HolisticGod.![]()
I didn't want to be harsh, I'm just not going to read peacefully such things about my country. There are so many false and stupid myths about Poland out there, that you have to react. Poland was fully independent for over 900 years since it was estabilished in the X century. Nowadays we have like 2-3% minorities, considering them Germans, Lithuanians, Ukrainians ect. Throughout history we were rather not divided but a dividing party (Poland held to vast territories in today's Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus). Bah, I'm sure you know it.
those terriotys were gained when poland entered a union with lithuania, creating Poland-Lithuania (Rzeczpospolita Oboja Narodów).Poland held to vast territories in today's Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus
AlexanderG said:There is no Poland. It is divided between the Pagans, the Germans and the Russians as it always was. Poland is a 20th century creation of British Imperialists.![]()
HolisticGod said:Blom,
Under one rule, yes, but in four thrones. Charles V held around forty titles constituting Sovereignty over Spain, and until Felipe II came to power this was not, at least by Catalonians, Basques and the great cities of the south, regarded as a permanent arrangement.
Nation-States are something else entirely. France, for example, became one during the Revolution, Austria and Prussia during the Napoleonic Wars, Russia under Catherine the Great, England perhaps earliest of all under Elizabeth or even after the War of the Roses, Holland in the course of gaining its independence (and even then, only parts of it were truly "national").
I think there's a much stronger argument for, ironically, those countries with weak central governments-meaning weak monarchs-like Poland and England and Scotland and Ireland than the traditional autocracies. Parliaments and Ministries drawn from across a Sovereign's territories had a profoundly unifying affect on their constituents.
Somethin' about gettin' together...
Dzoser said:I hope that's only joke.
Belissarius said:ahhh from everything I've read about nation states France is considered the first nation state and it was considered a nation state years before the revolution. I havent read any work that considers france a non-nation state after the 100 years war. Can you site any works that back up your assurtions that england and not france is the first nation state?
TheLotus said:I don't know what's more amusing, Alexander's joke or the amount of people taking him seriously. :rofl:
Really, though, more insulting than myths about Poland is the total ignoring of Lithuania's existence as an equal partner in the Commonwealth.![]()