Cordoba

[ForzaA]

Can't find a Cordoba thread anywhere :wacko:

Anyway, Cordoba has two (very) short lived leaders, 1 explorer, 1 conquistador, that live TOO short imho.

the explorer I sent out right away from Andalusia, did not discover a single seazone (sent south towards Canaries) ..
the conquistador, started off in Toledo, I marched him to Andalusia, where I swapped his troops for cavalry.. boarded ships, headed towards canaries, he died before his troops could land.
They both need atleast a month (possibly a few) more, or they just need to be removed.

 

[MattyG]

Already changed in Beta 6 which will come out in about two days.


But, hey, thanks!

 

[Culise]

Resurrection! Since, as with ForzaA, I only saw this Cordoba thread.

With the confirmation in the Bug Testing thread that the Arabic culture for Cordoba is intended as-is (though I am still curious about that, since a player could conceivably see reward in taking the Cordoban military on a little war against the Caliphate and Egypt for any same-culture provinces they can grab - it may be best to just go with Andalusi alone at game start, or if that's impossible, perhaps lose Arabic with the Mutazelite heresy), I'm wondering if the inheritance of Morocco or the rise of the Moroccan Sa'did dynasty (probably the former, since the annexation of Morocco is a result of the peaceful integration of the two nations into one) couldn't give Cordoba Maghrebi culture so that those lands don't remain a bit hostile, and to reflect an acceptance and integration of those lands nobility into the Cordoban government over the past centuries. Of course, if the Moroccan dynasties are overthrown by the Malwas and flee for North Africa, this should also certainly cost Cordoba the culture again.

EDIT: Oh, and something else...why are there two Balearic events?

event = {
	id = 410820
	random = no
	country = CRD
	name = "Cordoba's claim on the Baleares"
	desc = "The Almohads conquered the Baleares in 1202 in the days of Caliph Al-Nasir. The islands had been a feud of the Almoravid family of the Banu Ganiya, who had prosperous commercial ties with a number of countries in Southern Italy. The island contained a great many Muslims of Andalusian background, and the island been part of the Ummayed Caliphate for a while. Cordoba's claim on the island was accepted by most muslim countries, except for the Sultanate of Tlemscen, which considered the Belearic islands part of her legitimate inheritance of her Almohadi past."
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1480 }
	offset = 90
	deathdate = { day = 30 month = december year = 1500 }


	action_b ={
		name = "Push our claim"
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = SIC value = -25 }
		command = { type = addcore which = 821 }
		command = { type = relation which = ALD value = -100 }
		command = { type = naval value = 250 }
		command = { type = ADM which = -1 value = 60 }
		command = { type = MIL which = -1 value = 60 }
		command = { type = transports which = -1 value = 5 }
		command = { type = cash value = -75 }
	}
	action_c ={
		name = "No, it is not worth it"
		command = { type = relation which = ALD value = 75 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = SIC value = 25 }
	}
}

event = {
	id = 410751
	random = no
	country = CRD
	trigger = {
		NOT = { owned = { province = 821 data = -1 } }
		NOT = { owned = { province = 821 data = ALM } }
		atwar = no
		stability = 0
		ai = no #ai version below
	}
	name = "Cordoba's claim on the Baleares"
	desc = "The Almohads conquered the Baleares in 1202 in the days of Caliph Al-Nasir. The islands had been a feud of the Almoravid family of the Banu Ganiya, who had prosperous commercial ties with a couple of countries in Southern Italy. The island contained a great number of Muslims of Andalusian background, and had been part of the Ummayed Caliphate for a while. Cordoba's claims on the island was considered valid by most except the Sultanate of Tlemscen, which considered the Belearic islands part of her legitimate inheritance of her Almohadi past."
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1480 }
	offset = 90
	deathdate = { day = 30 month = december year = 1500 }

	action_a  ={
		name = "Prepare for war"
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = SIC value = -25 }
		command = { type = addcore which = 821 }
		command = { type = relation which = ALD value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = NAF value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = BEA value = -100 }
		command = { type = badboy value = 1 }
		command = { type = cash value = -75 }
	}
	action_b ={
		name = "No, it is not worth it"
		command = { type = relation which = ALD value = 75 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = SIC value = 25 }
	}
}

There's also an AI-only version of the second event that's also predicated on a low BB, but...hmm, this probably should have gone in Bug Testing, no? Plus, both events still point to ALD when they should be changed to NAF, which is certainly a bug.

 

[MattyG]

Probably a matter of me meaning to go back and work on that and then forgetting to.

I wll look more closely at the files and events and make changes so it all makes sense.

Thanks for drawing my attention to it! Where would we be without all you eagle-eyed players!