Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Getting rid of ugly dark colouring

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
unmerged(51378)

unmerged(51378)

Field Marshal
Dec 5, 2005
2.893
0
Hello.

When I downloaded Interregnum and I played it (some time ago), I noticed there was some sort of really fugly dark colouring on the provinces. Has this changed sine then? If not, can I remove it? I would love to actually play this mod, but I loathed the colouring so much that I just can't stand it.

Thanks in advance.
 
You can easily replace it (I think someone else posted how you can do that, I think the file that you switch is colorscales.scv...either that or I've played too much starcraft. Replace it with the vanilla version.
 
Orimazd, NOBODY expects the Spanish inquisition.

I am going to revert to the Vanilla colourscales. This was made by Ryazan, I think, for his 437 mod, and Calipah liiked it, so I added it. I'm not sold on it myself, so lets revert.
 
orimazd said:
I expected the Spanish inquisition, though. Nobody else did.

But then again, I was the producer.
Click to expand...

So, that makes you ... the POPE!
 
People who lack taste!
 
:p I wholeheartedly agree with Calipah. And that doesn't happen often, so it must be true!
 
At the risk of bringing this thread back to the top, I suggest replacing the vanilla colorscales with lordbarkingdog's colorscales, as posted by ayeshteni. I installed it to my interregnum files and liked what I saw when I loaded as brittany. Though britanny is a boring nation to play.
 
orimazd said:
At the risk of bringing this thread back to the top, I suggest replacing the vanilla colorscales with lordbarkingdog's colorscales, as posted by ayeshteni. I installed it to my interregnum files and liked what I saw when I loaded as brittany. Though britanny is a boring nation to play.
Click to expand...


Why boring?

Can you provide a link to the thread please.
 
orimazd said:
http://www.europa-universalis.com/forum/showthread.php?t=256046

There's the colorscale link; and Britanny had pretty much no events. I got all my cores and more (minus languedoc) without any sort of trouble.
Click to expand...


Which 'path' did you chose? There ought to have been parliamentary events, the province culture change events, the Klodigists and the reformation, plus the marriage of Ana. And that's all in the first 140 years ...
 
I didn't play to 140 years, actually. Maybe 60 or 80. I got a little past the inheritance of Normandy, and by then I had annexed Wessex and vassalized the entirety of the british isles minus Eire.
 
orimazd said:
I didn't play to 140 years, actually. Maybe 60 or 80. I got a little past the inheritance of Normandy, and by then I had annexed Wessex and vassalized the entirety of the british isles minus Eire.
Click to expand...


How many events do you expect for a country? I mean no disrespect with such a question.

The problem with the wealthy parts of western Europe is that in SP, becomming an uber-powerful state is very easy and for experienced players makes for dull play, because you know already that you have 'won'
 
MattyG said:
How many events do you expect for a country? I mean no disrespect with such a question.

The problem with the wealthy parts of western Europe is that in SP, becomming an uber-powerful state is very easy and for experienced players makes for dull play, because you know already that you have 'won'
Click to expand...

that's exactly why I play the Kingdom of Jerusalem, yes.

At least the Caliphate/Mameluke alliance is a challenge ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back