• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Jojonium

Captain-General
23 Badges
Feb 24, 2020
28
59
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV
GOD'S HAND MADE WONDERS, GODS HAND MADE ME
- A NORMAN SICILY AAR

p036_1_00.jpg


PREFACE
Hello everyone. This is my second attempt at a CK3 After Action Report. The first one was also a Hauteville AAR, which I had attempted 2 years ago. Unfortunately, it has been discontinued due to time management, me getting burned out, and the inclusion of new DLCs and content that made it outdated. I am going to give the Hautevilles another shot, but this time I'm going to make it different, in that I'm going to skip forward to 1178 during the reign of William II or William "the Good". He was the last Norman king of Sicily until he was succeeded by the Hohenstaufens, who married William's designated heir Constance de Hauteville.

So what if things turned out differently? What if Hauteville rule was to continue for a few hundred more years? Let's find out. But first, we shall start with a prelude to get us up to date.

As with my first AAR, this one will be a historical record written in a similar format as George R.R. Martin's book Fire and Blood.
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
PROLOGUE

The Kingdom of Sicily was a kingdom like no other: where three peoples were conjoined under the southern sun and formed the jewel that lies between East and West. The island itself was no stranger to people from both sides, for it had been conquered by Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Goths, Lombards, and Saracens. It was said that the philosopher and mathematician Archimedes had made the island his home and had intended to spread his knowledge from there…before he was struck down by Roman invaders in his own home.

Even today, the people living south of Italy have always referred to themselves as Sicilians rather than Italians. But from an outsider’s perspective, it would be hard to tell what made these people uniquely Sicilian. In Palermo alone, the streets thronged with people of all walks of life. Normans, Lombards, Greeks and Arabs to name a few, all together in what could best be described as working harmony.

While the island’s rich history has certainly played a role in this hodgepodge of peoples, one should not ignore the surprising amount of tolerance exercised by the current ruling family of Normans, that being the Hautevilles.

As with many of their peers, the Hautevilles’ origins can be traced back to the Nordic raiders who settled down along the northern coast of France in what would one day become Normandy. Though they have long since cast aside their false gods and became followers of Christ, the Normans never abandoned their martial ways. Ever driven by ambition and thirst for battle, these men of fortune would depart from the stormy shores of Normandy in search of warmer pastures.

By the eleventh century, the Normans found their way to southern Italy, serving as sellswords to whoever offered the most coin. At the time, southern Italy was embroiled in a conflict between the Lombards and Eastern Romans of Constantinople, whose holdings in the region were a mere shadow of what they were under Emperor Justinian. These conflicts ensured the Normans were in no shortage of employment and, with their martial prowess and use of heavy cavalry, they quickly established themselves as skilled warriors. For their efforts, the Normans were allowed to keep some of their conquests, a mistake that their patrons would regret in the years to come.

Among these Norman mercenary bands was the Hauteville family, led by Tancred de Hauteville. Not much was known about them prior to their conquest of southern Italy. Some sources argue that they were among the many petty barons who eschewed their holdings in Normandy for pastures new, while others like Anna Komene have argued that they were nothing more than jumped-up cutthroats.

Regardless, Tancred and his sons quickly established themselves as one of the most powerful Norman families in southern Italy. After Tancred’s passing in 1041, the Hautevilles’ ascension was soon challenged by both the Germans and Eastern Romans. But under the leadership of Tancred’s sons, the Hautevilles eventually emerged triumphant over both empires. During one of these battles, they even took the Pope, Leo IX, hostage and forced him to acknowledge their territorial gains under the Duchy of Apulia and Calabria.


Robert Guiscard.png
Roger Bosso.png

Out of all of Tancred de Hauteville's sons,the most prominent of them were Robert Guiscard (left) and Roger Bosso (right).

Even as the Hautevilles were consolidating their holdings in the mainland, they have already set their eyes on neighbouring Sicily, which was occupied by the Saracen Muslims. The island’s fertile soil and sun-kissed fields made it ripe for farming, with grain, oranges, lemons, and olives being among its chief products. The capital city of Palermo was also a centre of commerce, thanks in part to Sicily’s strategic position in the Mediterranean.

Wanting to liberate the island in the name of Christendom, Pope Nicholas II granted the Hautevilles a lease to conquer Sicily, bestowing Tancred’s eldest surviving son, Robert Guiscard, the title of Duke of Sicily.



Battle of Cerami.jpg

Roger Bosso defeats the Muslim army at the Battle of Cerami.

In 1061, taking advantage of infighting among the Saracen occupiers, Robert and his younger brother Roger Bosso led the Norman invasion of Sicily, where they swiftly occupied Messina. Despite military support from the Zirid Sultanate in Africa, the Saracens were decisively defeated by the Normans at the Battle of Cerami in 1063.

Despite the Normans’ initial successes, however, the invasion would drag on for another ten years. Apart from resistance by local Saracens and Greeks, the Normans were forced to commit most of their troops in conquering the last remaining Eastern Roman holdings in Bari. But by January 1072, Palermo fell to the Normans after a five-month siege, bringing the island of Sicily under Christian rule once more.


Surrender of Palermo.jpg


Robert and Roger receiving the keys to Palermo from the surrendering Saracens.


With the conquest of Sicily complete, Robert Guiscard, ever hungry for more prizes and plunder, sets his sights eastward. The Eastern Roman Empire had lost most of its holding in Anatolia to the Seljuk Turks, with its territories in Greece and the Balkans looking ripe for conquest.

It is regrettable that we will be unable to delve further into the attempted Norman conquest of the Balkans. But for the sake of brevity, the Normans, despite initial successes on the battlefield, were eventually pushed out of the Eastern Roman Empire after a decisive defeat at the Battle of Larissa in 1083. The seventy-year-old Robert Guiscard would succumb to an illness in 1085 while attempting to mount a second invasion of Greece.

While Robert warred with the Eastern Romans, Roger would rule over Sicily in his brother’s stead, becoming its de facto ruler long before he inherited the title of Duke of Sicily upon Robert’s death. Roger died in June 1101, leaving behind two legitimate sons. However, the elder son Simon would pass away in 1106 before he reached his majority, leaving the younger son Roger as the sole inheritor of his father’s lands and titles.

Only five years old when his father died, Roger II was more a scholar than a warrior. His mother and regent, Adelaide del Vasto, allowed courtiers of Greek and even Arab descent to instruct him in languages, literature, mathematics and the arts. Although Roger II preferred to dabble in the quill and parchment rather than the sword and lance, he still excelled at the latter all the same, something that his enemies would grievously fail to take into account.

In June 1127, when Roger was thirty-two, William – the grandson of Robert Guiscard – died without an heir. Roger thus found himself in possession of the vast majority of southern Italy, which soon stirred much discontent and fear among his vassals who have long resented the Hautevilles. The petty barons found support from Pope Honorius II, who too wanted to see the end of Norman rule in Italy. However, Roger soon dissuaded the nobles of any thought of rebellion with a few strokes of the quill, promising many of them elevated titles and positions in court. But this merely forestalled the inevitable conflict brewing between him and the papacy.

After the death of Honorius II in 1130, two candidates were nominated as his successors – Innocent II and Anacletus II. Innocent’s candidacy was championed France, England and even the German Emperor. Outvoted by his rival, Anacletus found support from Roger on the promise that he recognise Roger as King of Sicily. Thus, on Christmas Day of 1130, Roger was crowned in Palermo with a paper bull of approval by the antipope.



Roger II mosaic.png


Mosaic of Roger II being crowned King of Sicily by Jesus Christ.


This did not sit well with Innocent, who called a crusade against Anacletus and his “half-heathen king”. The monarchs of France, England and Germany mustered their armies against Roger. Even the Emperor of Constantinople provided the armies with financial support, hoping to see Norman hegemony eradicated once and for all. Roger’s discontented vassals, under the leadership of Ranulf of Capua, took advantage of Innocent’s condemnation to rise up against their liege lord. But Roger’s forces, under the command of his son Roger the Younger, would hold out against the invaders for several years while managing to bring the rebels to heel. The passing of Anacletus in January 1138 did not deter Roger’s ambitions. As a papal army led by Innocent himself entered Sicily the following summer, they were ambushed and smashed by Roger the Younger’s forces at Galuccio. The pope was taken prisoner and on 25 July 1139, he was forced to acknowledge Roger as “Rex Siciliae ducatus Apuliae et principatus Capuae”, finally uniting the Norman conquests into a single kingdom.

The remaining years of Roger II’s reign saw the Kingdom of Sicily’s dominions expand southwards into the North African coast from Tripoli to Cape Bona. Roger had also become a great patron of Greek and Arab artists, architects and scholars, with the geographer Idrisi and the historian Nilus Doxopatrius being some of his more famous clients. Roger also employed labourers from the West and craftsmen from the East, commissioning pieces of art and architecture. But all paled in comparison to the Capella Palatina, a grand chapel with its Norman doors, Sarcenic arches, and Byzantine mosaics adorned with Arab scriptures.


Capella Palatina.png


The interior of the Capella Palatina.

Roger II’s first wife was Princess Elvira of Castille, whom he married in 1117 when he was still the Count of Sicily. As Castille had a sizeable Muslim population itself, Elvira was as much of a fervent patron of the Islamic arts as her husband was. However, tragedy struck in 1135 when both King and Queen came down with an illness. While Roger survived, his wife was not as fortunate and she passed away on the 6th of February. The loss was a devastating blow to Roger, who reclused himself in his chambers for so long that many courtiers wondered if he had died. Roger would not marry for another fourteen years, after he had outlived four of his six children.

Roger II himself would eventually die in Palermo on the 26th of February 1154 at fifty-eight years old. Thus ends the first and possibly the greatest of the Sicilian kings.

The successor to Roger’s prosperous kingdom was his third and sole surviving son William, whom many scholars of his time would condescendingly – and perhaps unfairly – refer to as William “the Wicked” or “the Bad”. For during the majority of his reign, William was besotted by numerous rebellions by the barons under his rule, who saw his ascension as a sign of weakness of Hauteville hegemony.

But for all his faults, many of which may be attributed to his inability to measure up to his father’s legacy, William was as much a warrior as his Norman forebearers. He rallied his armies to quash the revolts, leaving the affairs of state to his officials. The most notable of these officials was Maio of Bari before his murder at the hands of discontented barons in November 1160, allegedly for plotting to assassinate the king, though such claims were more than likely unfounded. After his death, it was William’s wife, Margaret of Navarra who ruled in her husband’s place.

William would eventually succeed in suppressing the rebellions, but this came at the cost of his father’s African conquests, which were eventually lost to the expanding Almohadi Caliphate from Maghreb. The remaining years of William’s rule were relatively peaceful, if somewhat mundane, and he eventually passed away in 1166. His surviving heir William, now William II, succeeded him.

The death of William “the Wicked” would throw the burgeoning kingdom into a period of uncertainty. The kingdom had lost its African possessions and the revolts against his rule was evident that Hauteville dominion over southern Italy was far from secure.

This is where our story truly begins…
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 3Love
Reactions:
Welcome back to the Forum, @Jojonium . Hope this AAR goes better than your first attempt.

I very much like this preface. Great historical context. As a reader, I do wonder is this where you actually start your CK3 campaign? Or was there some game play before you came to this point?

A few other notes, if I may, but not about the AAR but rather the Forum, itself. I hope you will find readers here, as the CK3 sub-forum is one of the most active spots in the entire Forum. I would suggest though commenting on other AARs sometimes, if you have an interest, as that may draw folks to your AAR.

Other ways to attract folks to your AAR would be to include links to it in your signature. Also, you may wish to advertise your AAR in the Inkwell.

If you'd like to research writing topics there's the SolAARium and the fAARq, which are excellent resources.

Also, feel free to interact with other writers in the main part of the AARland forum.

Good luck to you. Looking forward to seeing more of this in 2025.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Welcome back to the Forum, @Jojonium . Hope this AAR goes better than your first attempt.

I very much like this preface. Great historical context. As a reader, I do wonder is this where you actually start your CK3 campaign? Or was there some game play before you came to this point?

A few other notes, if I may, but not about the AAR but rather the Forum, itself. I hope you will find readers here, as the CK3 sub-forum is one of the most active spots in the entire Forum. I would suggest though commenting on other AARs sometimes, if you have an interest, as that may draw folks to your AAR.

Other ways to attract folks to your AAR would be to include links to it in your signature. Also, you may wish to advertise your AAR in the Inkwell.

If you'd like to research writing topics there's the SolAARium and the fAARq, which are excellent resources.

Also, feel free to interact with other writers in the main part of the AARland forum.

Good luck to you. Looking forward to seeing more of this in 2025.
Hi @Chac1

Thanks for the advice on how to advertise my AAR, especially since it’s only my second one in a long time.

As for the prologue, it’s actually historical context for the years between 1066 and 1178. So all these events you see here in the prologue are actually what happened. Of course from here on out it will be original material based on my current Hauteville playthrough.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Sounds fun! Good luck on your Norman adventures @Jojonium. Those rebellious vassals sound like a persistent problem. I wonder if CK3 models that well.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
William II (1153 - 1213)

Prologue: Youth and Regency

1024px-Dedication_mosaic_-_Cathedral_of_Monreale_-_Italy_2015_(crop).jpg

William II of Sicily​

William II was born in Palermo on December 1153, the third of four children of William I “the Wicked” and Margeret of Navarre. A third-born son, Prince William had not been expected to sit on the throne, which was to be inherited by either of his older brothers Roger and Robert. William thus spent the first eight years of his childhood in relative idleness and comfort, unlike Roger and Robert who both received their parents’ full attention.

But alas, even the most perspicacious plans may often go awry in the most unexpected of ways. In 1160, when William was only seven, his second brother Robert passed away from a sudden illness. His eldest brother Roger would meet the same fate the following year and William was now next in line to the throne.

The loss of his two eldest sons was a devastating blow to King William and his dynasty, for the Hauteville family had started tearing itself apart like vultures over a carcass. Simon de Hauteville, bastard son of William I’s brother, Roger II, had attempted to seize the Sicilian throne for himself in 1161. Simon was assisted by Tancred of Lecce, the usurpers managed to detain the king and his family in the royal palace, and had the support of the citizens of Palermo to crown a new king. But the army remained loyal to William and managed to liberate the king from captivity, snatching victory from the jaws of defeat. The coup d’etat was put down, and the ringleaders were exiled for the remainder of William’s rule.

Barbershop_Count_Tancred_of_Cosenza_1178_10_01_0000.png
Barbershop_Count_Tancred_of_Cosenza_1178_10_01_0001.png

Simon and Tancred Hauteville, the ringleaders of the coup against William I of Sicily.​

William II was only twelve years old when his father died in 1166. Still in his minority, the regency fell upon the Queen Mother Margaret. The Queen Mother was a capable administrator, having assisted her husband in ruling the kingdom while he fought on campaign, and she was loved by the common folk of Palermo for both her tolerance and fairness.

Barbershop_King_William_II_of_Sicily_1179_08_07_0000.png

William II with his mother, Margaret of Navarre.​

Margaret’s regency was not without controversy, however. Fearful of the local nobility and their long history of treachery, the Queen Regent began surrounding herself with courtiers from France and her homeland of Navarre. Though the local barons resented the growing presence of foreigners in the royal court, discontent merely amounted to whispers at best and rumblings at worst.

But in 1167, Margaret made the fateful decision to install her cousin Stephen du Perche as archbishop of Palermo. Resentful of an outsider taking control over a local ecclesiastical estate, the clergy sided with the nobles against the Queen Regent. Accusations were levied against Margeret and her foreign allies, the most scandalous of which was that she was having an extramarital affair with Stephen. Unable to deflect these rumours without causing further conflict, Margaret had no choice but to remove her foreign courtiers, and the remainder of her regency carried on in relative mundanity.
 
Last edited:
  • 5Like
Reactions:
William II (1153 - 1213)

Chapter I: Ascending the Throne

The young king William finally reached his majority in 1171, where he was crowned in the Capella Palatina. Although his mother had taken great pains to educate William II in following his father and grandfather’s example, the young king found matters of state boring and preferred to indulge himself in feasts and other pleasures. But unlike his sullen father, William had a generous, amiable nature that endeared him to the local barons, who would leave each feast with a better opinion of the king than when they arrived.

20250102203649_1.jpg

But the first major challenge to William II’s reign was the matter of succession. His younger brother and heir, Prince Henry of Capua, would pass away from an illness, the same fate that befell their older brothers. Marriage proposals were sent all across Europe, though William already had his eye on the eldest daughter of Emperor Manuel of Constantinople. The betrothal ultimately failed to come through, however, much to the young king’s consternation.

In the end, the bride of his choosing was Joan of England. Although she was William’s junior by nearly twelve years and had yet to reach her majority, she was by no means an impractical match. Joan was the seventh child of the English king Henry II and Eleanor, Duchess of Aquitaine. Apart from gaining a powerful ally in England, Aquitaine was the richest and most fertile province in France. Both King and Queen would make for powerful allies for Sicily, who faced threats from all sides of her kingdom.

Barbershop_King_Henry_II_of_England_1178_10_01_0000.png

20250108222706_1.jpg
20250108222655_1.jpg

Joan of England's parents were King Henry II and Queen Eleanor, King of England and Duchess of Aquitaine, respectively.​

To the east, William’s diplomatic relations with the Emperor of Constantinople had cooled after the latter rejected William’s marriage proposal to his eldest daughter Maria. The Eastern Romans had also long resented the Hautevilles for stealing its southern Italian holdings, and the attempted conquest of the Balkans by Robert Guiscard remained fresh in their minds.

To the north was the German Emperor Frederick Barbarossa of the Hohenstaufen dynasty. Frederick continued to cling on to his ambitions of conquering all of Italy, having previously feuded with William’s father and grandfather in the past.

Finally, to the south was the growing Almohadi Caliphate, which had swallowed up the Kingdom of Sicily’s African holdings during the reign of William I, who was too preoccupied dealing with German and Greek-sanctioned rebellions to defend them from the Muslim threat.

Europe_1178.jpg

Europe in 1178 AD.
The next few years of William II’s reign will prove decisive for the future of House de Hauteville. Nevertheless, Sicily was still a prosperous kingdom even after the loss of its African conquests. Its fertile fields produced a variety of goods, while Palermo remained an important centre of trade between the West and the East even with the emergence of other trade ports such as Pisa or even nearby Amalfi. William had also inherited a battle-hardened army, seasoned from years of battling foreign incursions and upstart vassals.
 
Last edited:
  • 4Like
Reactions:
the remainder of her regency carried on in relative mundanity.
Mundanity for her and her son, but I'm sure the scheming lords got up to much mischief.
The next few years of William II’s reign will prove decisive for the future of House de Hauteville.
Let's hope so. There are threats on all sides, and even within his own court.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
William II (1153-1213)

Chapter II: The English Princess

The first few years of William II’s reign were relatively peaceful and uneventful. However, much of the kingdom’s cosmopolitan identity that thrived under Roger II had become a relic of the past. Migrations from the West saw Catholic population outnumber the Greek Orthodox and Muslim peoples, many of whom were pushed out of Palermo and into the south-eastern tip of Sicily.

20250109213934_1.jpg
20250109215320_1.jpg

Left: Sicily's cultural demographic in 1178
Right: Sicily's cultural demographic in 1213, near the end of William II's reign​

William’s betrothed finally came of age in the winter of 1181. Although the wedding was met with delay when Joan unexpectedly came down with a fever, the English princess managed to recover and arrived safely in Sicily in the autumn of 1182. Chroniclers report that as soon as Joan disembarked the ship alongside her parents, they were met with rapturous applause. Commoners had flocked by the hundreds – perhaps even by the thousands – to meet their new queen.

Wedding Ceremony 1.jpg

The ceremony was a happy and lavish affair as guests from all across Europe came to pay their respects to the bride and groom. Joan took note of the candied figs served at the feast, and they had become a favourite treat of hers since.

20250102212250_1.jpg
20250102212453_1.jpg

It was said that just before the procession, King Henry had muttered something in William’s ear that made the Sicilian king’s face go pale. However, the young king’s mother saw her son’s disconcernment and took him into a nearby room. What mother and son said to each other, none would ever know, but the young king left the room far more relaxed than he had been just moments before earlier.

20250102212927_1.jpg

The celebrations would last for seven days and nights, but in the days following the bedding ceremony, rumours that the marriage had not been consummated began spreading among the guests. However, these are nothing more than salacious court gossip, for numerous eyewitness accounts reported that both the bride and groom appeared happy in each other’s company. Further disproving these rumours was the announcement of Queen Joan’s pregnancy in the spring of 1183.

20250102213518_1.jpg

Of course, the wedding was not a wholly happy occasion. William’s uncle King Antso VI of Navarre had fallen overboard his ship on 2nd April 1182 as he was en route to Sicily, where was swallowed by waves. No one knew as to how the Navarrese king fell overboard. His wife, Constance (who was also William’s aunt by blood), claimed foul play was involved and that someone deliberately pushed him overboard. But sailors manning the ship the couple were travelling testified that the king had been drunk that night and had gone up to the deck to sober up, only to lose his footing in his stupor.

That had not been the end of the Navarrese royal family’s problems, for shortly after the wedding, it was discovered that Margaret had an affair with King Henry’s scribe, a commoner named Peter. A liaison for solace, some have speculated, for the Queen Mother had only learned of her brother’s death.

A girl named Elbira was born out of this affair. Despite her status as a bastard, William ensured his half-sister had a place in court, albeit away from the prying eyes of his vassals. As for the Queen Mother, whatever influence she still had in court was snuffed out by the scandal, and she would live the rest of her days ignominiously until her death on 2nd October 1200.

Turning back to the subject of William’s marriage, the royal couple’s affection for each other was well-known. Unlike her pleasure-loving husband, however, Joan was a cunning woman with a scalding wit, with some saying that she was very much like her mother, the Duchess of Aquitaine, in that regard. Together, they would sire seven children, two sons and five daughters, to the relief of many in court. Had the Queen failed to sire even a daughter, one could only dread what the future holds for the Hauteville dynasty.
 
Last edited:
  • 4Like
Reactions:
I have to say, I really liked the contextualization chapter, it's pretty well structured and does a pretty good job introducing the scenario of 12th-century Sicily to the audience.

Joan was a cunning woman with a scalding wit, with some saying that she was very much like her mother, the Duchess of Aquitaine, in that regard.

It is wise to have someone to ground the rather sybarite nature of the king.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Of course, the wedding was not a wholly happy occasion. William’s uncle King Antso VI of Navarre had fallen overboard his ship on 2nd April 1182 as he was en route to Sicily, where was swallowed by waves. No one knew as to how the Navarrese king fell overboard. His wife, Constance (who was also William’s aunt by blood), claimed foul play was involved and that someone deliberately pushed him overboard. But sailors manning the ship the couple were travelling testified that the king had been drunk that night and had gone up to the deck to sober up, only to lose his footing in his stupor.
This could be a whole AAR right here.

Good to see the dynasty;s future secured with an heir and a spare. Hopefully, no more diseases hit the realm.
 
  • 1
Reactions:

William II (1153 - 1213)

Chapter III: Peace and Plagues

20250102215413_2.jpg

During William’s reign, the ever-present threat in the West loomed over his kingdom. The Almohadi Caliphate, now under the rule of Caliph Yusuf “the Righteous” II, had conquered the Kingdom of Castille in 1184, gaining a massive foothold in Iberia.

But the main threat to William’s rule was neither foreign invaders nor rebellious vassals, but a plague known as the Aetolian Pox. According to written texts from the Medical School of Salerno, the main carriers were the Greek sailors and merchantmen who landed in Sicily’s port cities and harbor towns. These travellers then frequented the brothels and inns, where they passed the pox on to others.

In 1186, a year since the Aetolian pox made its presence known in Sicily, more than a thousand people had died from the plague. The capital of Palermo, as the centre of trade between East and West, was hit the hardest, though the royal family was thankfully spared from the epidemic on account of the king’s security measures.

20250102222525_1.jpg

But another problem soon emerged. By May, the Aetolian pox had whipped the common folk into a frenzy, for they had come to believe that it was divine punishment from God. Riots soon broke out in the streets of every province. Shops were broken in and looted, carts were overturned, and houses set ablaze. William sent his marshal and trusted bodyguard, Robert de Rohan, as well as five hundred men-at-arms, to restore order. A curfew was soon imposed with those violating it threatened to be put to death.

No sooner had the contagion abated did the king order for the construction of hospices to shelter and treat the sick and weary. More cynical critics of William argued the king merely intended for these quarters to isolate these poor souls, lest another plague like the Aetolian pox cast its blight upon the Kingdom of Sicily.

Despite the ravages of the plague, the kingdom continued to prosper. A county fair was held at Bari in the spring of 1188, with the king granting the charter to the mayor of Tripani due to the latter’s experience in financial matters. Among the various products sold included spices from the Levant, mechanical marvels from the Abbasid Caliphate, and silks from Cathay. King William, always fond of extravagant fabrics and envious of Constantinople’s control over the silk market, purchased dozens of rolls to sell. Sadly, the investiture bore little fruit, for the kingdom’s best weavers could never measure up to the Greeks.

20250103225129_1.jpg

King William would see more success in his architectural investments as his grandfather Roger II had done. He ordered the construction of roads in Malta, for the island fortress was sorely lacking in roads. The king also established a market town in Calatafimi, whose hills would one day be renowned for their olive farms. He also leased out the port city of Taranto to the Knights Templar as a naval base in exchange for a hefty sum of coin.


cb96c414-75bf-471a-9d73-042937bf27ea.jpg

With the royal treasury now bursting with coin like never before, William commissioned a hunting lodge that rivalled even the royal palace, the Palazzo dei Normani, in beauty and grandeur. The building, named the Zisa Palace, was originally planned by William's father before his untimely passing. Built by Italian stonemasons and designed by Saracen craftsmen based on the designs of the extinct Fatimid empire, the Zisa Palace was the crowning achievement of King William. There, he would spend most of his days rather than in the Palazzo dei Normani.

In Trani, the former seat of the Hautevilles before the conquest of Sicily, William established an academy to train soldiers. It was where most of the Norman army was stationed with the purpose of quelling any riots (or rebellions) in the Italian mainland, though a sizable garrison would remain in Palermo to protect the royal family.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
According to written texts from the Medical School of Salerno, the main carriers were the Greek sailors and merchantmen who landed in Sicily’s port cities and harbor towns.
An unfortunate easy scapegoat in such dark times, especially given the rivalry between Sicily and Byzantium.
No sooner had the contagion abated did the king order for the construction of hospices to shelter and treat the sick and weary. More cynical critics of William argued the king merely intended for these quarters to isolate these poor souls, lest another plague like the Aetolian pox cast its blight upon the Kingdom of Sicily.
It's probably a bit of both. It depends on how well funded the hospices are. William seems more willing to spend his gold on fairs, silks, and palaces. All good things, mind you. But there are more pressing priorities with a plague on.
 
Last edited:
  • 1
Reactions:
An unfortunate easy scapegoat in such dark times, especially given the rivalry between Sicily and Byzantium.

It's probably a bit of both. It depends on how well funded there hospices are. William seems more willing to spend his gold on fairs, silks, and palaces. All good things, mind you. But there are more pressing priorities with a plague on.
Don't want to spoil too much, but the plague will be a persistent problem for him down the road. (Idk why the plague mechanic was especially aggressive in this playthrough)
 
  • 1
Reactions:
William II (1153 - 1213)

Chapter IV: Progenies and Pacts - The Children of William II
Barbershop_King_William_II_of_Sicily_1210_03_09_0001.png
The royal family of Sicily, 1201 (Left to right: Edith, Margaret, Constance, Catherine, Queen Joan, King William II, Roger, Nicolas, Ida, and Eleanor)

It is here that we dedicate a chapter to the many children of King William and Queen Joan, and the betrothals that William arranged for them. Each and every one of them represented the future of the Hauteville dynasty, whose numbers were reduced to less than ten due to diseases and infighting. As their children grew up, the king and queen began planning several advantageous betrothals to strengthen the kingdom’s ties to the rest of Europe.

The most important of these children was William’s eldest son and heir, Roger, named after the esteemed founder of their kingdom. Born on 21st October 1184, Roger proved to be very much unlike his father. He was a curious and studious young man driven by a sense of responsibility to uphold his family's legacy, with his tutors often remarking on his diligence in both scholarly and martial pursuits. He was known to rise before dawn to study administrative records, followed by hours of training in swordsmanship and horsemanship. Yet, even as a boy, Roger exhibited an innate sense of justice that earned him the admiration of the court. He was quick to arbitrate disputes between his many siblings, demonstrating a natural ability to balance fairness with firmness.


20250104175426_1.jpg

At nine years old, he was sent to ward and squire under the King of England. But it was not Henry II who now sat on the English throne. The Curtmantle had succumbed to a stroke in 1187, dying at fifty-four years old. His eldest son and heir, Henry the Younger, had predeceased him by four years earlier from an illness, leaving his younger brother Richard to take the crown.

images.jpg


Portrait of King Richard of England​

From the accounts of chroniclers in the English and Aquitainian courts, Richard was described to have been a warrior born and bred, but also proud to a fault. Yet a man of such stature would serve as a good example for the heir of Sicily. Under the watchful eye of his formidable uncle, Roger's character was tempered in the fires of chivalry and martial valour. Richard saw potential in his nephew and personally oversaw his training in the art of war, instilling in him a deep respect for the code of knighthood and the glory of the battlefield. It was during Roger’s wardship that his father made plans to betroth him to Richard’s second and the prettiest of his daughters, Constance (who was also Roger’s first cousin from his mother’s side), thereby reinforcing the ties between the thrones of England and Sicily.

But Roger was not the eldest child, for that honor went to Princess Eleanor who was born on the 22nd of September 1183. A sickly girl, to the point that William and Joan had initially feared she would not survive the year, the princess would grow up into an intelligent and confident young woman who effortlessly charmed those around her.


20250104174321_1.jpg

Eleanor would be promised to multiple men in her lifetime. The first was Prince Andras of Hungary, a diligent and temperate young man and heir to the Hungarian throne. Such a match would gain William a powerful ally against the Germans in the north and the Greeks in the East. However, the marriage would never come to pass. Andras’s father was King Bela III, who did not earn the moniker of “the Quarreler” without reason. After a dispute of unknown cause, Bela III had his son placed under house arrest for several years. Not even news of Eleanor’s majority, or the missives sent by William, could change the stubborn king’s mind or heart.

Wroth at this turn of events, Eleanor’s parents broke off the betrothal by 1204 and instead found a match in Reginald Redvers, the gregarious Duke of Cornwall. But the marriage was soon short-lived, for Reginald would die a year later from smallpox, shortly before he and Eleanor’s daughter Petrolina was born.

Eleanor would find her second husband in Gwalchmai Aberffraw, younger brother of King Godwyn of Wales. Together they had a daughter named Sioned on 29 April 1211. But once again, in a cruel twist of fate, Gwalchimai’s life would be claimed by the same disease that killed Eleanor’s first husband on October 1210.

Two consecutive deaths made it difficult for William to find a new husband for Eleanor, with some in court wondering if she was cursed. But the princess took matters into her own hands, and she claimed Gwalchimai’s brother Siwauna as her third husband. Siwauna himself was a widower, having been married to King Richard’s second daughter Agnes (herself a cousin of Eleanor’s) until she died in the captivity of her father’s enemies. Some claimed that as Siwauna retreated into his chambers to mourn his wife’s passing, he found Eleanor waiting for him, and the rest was history.


20250106210447_2.jpg

Although bastard-born, Godwyn usurped the throne from his half-brother Einion.​


It is here that we temporarily digress from the main subject at hand to discuss the King of Wales and his brothers. Although they were the sons of the previous Welsh king Daffyd ap Crissant of House Abberfraw, they were merely sons of one of his mistresses. His trueborn son, Einion, had risen up against his father and executed him in a bloody coup. That was when the deceased king’s bastard sons challenged their treacherous half-brother for the throne. Einion found no allies in court, most of whom would rather side with a bastard than a kinslayer and kingslayer, and his reign was soon short-lived. Once Einion was at his mercy, King Godwyn chose not to taint his name by committing the same sins his half-brother had in seizing the throne. Instead, he merely had Einion blinded and banished from England.

Returning to the subject of William’s children, his third child Catherine was born on September 11th, 1186. A lusty girl since she was only a babe, Catherine was bolder than her older sister that it bordered on arrogance. She had little patience for those who disagreed with her, and her strong-willed nature earned her both admirers and rivals within the court. Though she was born a princess, she would eventually rise as a queen herself, which we shall discuss in greater detail later on.

Another daughter was born on the 4th of April 1188, whom William named Margaret after his own beloved mother. Perhaps it is fitting that much like the Queen Mother, Margaret proved to be the most obedient and dutiful of William’s children, never indulging in the vices of her older sisters.


20250106212010_1.jpg

The marriage of Princess Margaret and the Archon of Sardinia

She was wed to the Archon of neighbouring Sardinia, a nobleman from the Lacon-Gunale family named Pascalle, in 1204. Together they had a daughter named Susanna, but the marriage did not last long. Pascalle had been caught having an affair with a daughter of one of his vassals, whose repute would not be worth mentioning here. It did not take much convincing from Margaret for the Pope to annul the marriage. But in exchange for Pascalle’s acquiescence, Margaret was forbidden from seeing her daughter, for Susanna was still Pascalle’s heir. To add insult to injury, Pascalle would go on to take his lover as his second wife. Some chroniclers speculate that he did this less out of affection, but out of added spite against Margaret and her family. Margaret would not wed another man, instead remaining in her father’s court where she served him (and later her brother) dutifully.


20250106210447_3.jpg

The betrothal of Berthwallt Aberffraw and Constance de Hauteville.​

William’s fifth child and fourth daughter Constance (not to be confused with Prince Roger’s betrothed) was born on the 23rd of November 1190. Out of all of William’s children, Constance’s character remains the hardest to discern. Chroniclers often described her as a woman who kept to herself, yet her words would alays be honeyed whenever she spoke. Like her older sister Eleanor, she would wed another of Godwyn’s younger brothers, Prince Berthwallt.

A fifth daughter named Ida would follow Constance three years later on the 13th of February 1193. Beautiful and generous in equal measure, many young knights and squires were soon fawning over her and doing her every bidding, though the princess never abused her power over them. Unlike her siblings who married into foreign nobility, Ida was instead betrothed to one of the king’s vassals, Count Gilbert Sanseverino of Camarda, and they had four children together.

It would be another five years before Queen Joan became pregnant again, and on the 11th of October 1198, a daughter named Edith was born. A shy and subdued girl, Edith was nevertheless adored by those around her. Less than two years later, on January 4, William would at last have his second son and a spare to the throne should anything happen to Roger. Nicolas was his name, made at Queen Joan’s behest in honour of a deceased nephew of hers from the House of Bourgogne. The prince was a wild child, just as bold as his older brother Roger but twice as fierce. Yet his closest companion was the demure Princess Edith, who he would follow wherever she went.

King William’s youngest children would not have their betrothals made during his reign. Nevertheless, the king was able to secure alliances that would protect his kingdom’s borders in both the West (England and Wales) and the East (Jerusalem).

But in an ironic twist of fate, these alliances would soon drag the Norman kingdom into new conflicts that would define the remaining years of William II.
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
That's a lot of kids, wow! But it does look like one big happy family, not something you usually find in medieval nobility. No conflicts or kinslaying here.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
That's a lot of kids, wow! But it does look like one big happy family, not something you usually find in medieval nobility. No conflicts or kinslaying here.
Yeah, it was a pain for me writing this section because of the sheer number of kids I had. Ironic since William and Joan failed to have any kids in real life, which was what contributed to the end of the Hautevilles when William appointed his aunt Constance (who was married to the Hohenstaufens) as his heir.
 
William II (1153 - 1213)

Chapter V: Intervention in the Holy Land
In 1193 AD, after over twenty years of peace, the Kingdom of Sicily finally found itself at war again. But instead of fighting against invading Arabs, Germans, Greeks or even its own rebellious vassals, the Norman army would be fighting on the rugged hills and sandy dunes of the Levant.

The Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem was ruled by Baldwin IV. Once a diligent and noble man of stature, leprosy had wasted away his body to a shadow of its former self. He had no children because of his condition, and thus declared his sister Sibylla as his heir.

1280px-Schlacht_von_Montgisard_2.jpg

Baldwin IV defeated a Saracen force led by Sultan Salah al-Din at the Battle of Montgisard in 1177 AD, despite being afflicted with leprosy.
For almost a century, the Kingdom of Jerusalem had weathered several invasions by the Saracens, who sought to bring the Holy Land back into the Mohammedan fold. In the north were the Abbasids. Though they were a shadow of the empire that dominated the Mohamedan world two hundred years prior, they remain a persistent threat to the Holy Land from their capital in Bagdhad. To the south was another Mohammaden dynasty known as the Ayubbids, led by a man named Salah al-Din who had overthrown the old Fatimid yoke and proclaimed himself Sultan of Egypt and Syria. But the Sultan’s reign would be short-lived, for he would die on April of 1179 of camp fever, an ignominuous end for a would-be conqueror. His lands were divvied up amongst families, who soon squabbled over who would inherit Salah al-Din’s empire.

Baldwin finally succumbed to his condition on February 14, 1179, and his sister ascended his throne. Sibylla proved to be as capable as her brother, despite being of the fairer sex, with many giving her the moniker of “the Righteous” for her sense of duty and justice. But more importantly, she had three children with her second husband Guy de Lusignan, all of whom were eligible for marriage.

King William thus saw an opportunity. Although he was no means a devout Christian, courting an alliance with Jerusalem would extend his family’s influence and legitimise his rule in the eyes of the pope, who his family had feuded with since the beginning of the Norman conquests. A marriage pact was thus arranged in 1193, with his second daughter Catherine betrothed to Sibylla’s son and heir Francois de Lusignan. In exchange, William was to provide military aid to Jerusalem, which was currently under assault by the fractured remnants of Salah al-Din’s empire, now under the tenuous leadership of Salah al-Din’s younger brother.

20250103233209_1.jpg

And so, eight thousand and six hundred soldiers set sail for the Holy Land on their longships. Unlike his Norman forebearers, William was no warrior and command of the army instead fell upon Nicefuru di Nicusa, a seasoned knight of admirable character. Our first-hand account detailing William’s war in Jerusalem comes from a scribe in the service of Nicefuru, who laid bare his experiences in the Holy Land. Although Nicefuru was an accomplished commander and warrior, he was illiterate and thus required his scribe to read him orders and correspondences.

20250104113005_2.jpg

Nicefuru di Nicusa served as the chief commander of the Norman army in Jerusalem.

The Norman army landed on the shores of the Levant, where they clashed with an Egyptian host on the 23rd of February 1194, in what would be known as the Battle of Ghazza. Among the prisoners taken was the eldest son of Salah al-Din himself. On the 18th of September, the Norman army would score another victory against the Mohammedans who were attempting to besiege the city of Arabella.

But in spite of these victories, the situation soon became dire for Jerusalem. Most of the Egyptian army was now besieging the Holy City itself with an estimated ten thousand soldiers. Trebuchets and other siege machines were set up within a day and began bombarding the city’s walls.

20250104103110_1.jpg

To make matters worse, the Abbasids of Baghdad would also declare war on Jerusalem, believing that the kingdom’s forces would be too preoccupied with the war in the south to protect its northern borders. They were correct, for the Abbasid armies soon overran Syria, plundering towns and enslaving the civilians.

In November, the Norman army attempted to break the siege of the Holy City, catching the Egyptian invaders by surprise after a night’s march. Although outnumbered, Nicefuru had assumed that the armies of Jerusalem would come to reinforce them, having dispatched messengers to inform his allies of the attack. He was sorely mistaken.

8992.jpg

A Norman lancer strikes down a Saracen rider at the Battle for Jerusalem, 1194 AD.

The Norman cavalry had struck first, attacking the Egyptians' encampment and setting fire to their siege engines. Exhilarated by their success, however, the Norman cavalry had charged too far, and the Egyptians were able to rally their forces and launched a countercharge, their mounted archers loosing devastating volleys upon the Norman horsemen. Seeing that no reinforcements would come, Nicefuru ordered the remainder of his army to retreat northwards to the port city of Tyre. Twelve hundred Normans lost their lives in this battle.

20250104102808_1.jpg

It was in Tyre that Nicefuru would learn, to his fury, of the reason behind the Jerusalem army’s failure to reinforce him. They had moved north to stop the Abbasid advance in Syria, meaning that Nicefuru could not count on them for help.

Nevertheless, the Normans' attack had the intended effect of breaking the siege of Jerusalem. Without their siege engines, the Egyptians might as well be throwing their men against Jerusalem’s walls, so they retreated back to Egypt to resupply and rearm. But the First Battle for Jerusalem, as it was called, showed that the Normans could not hope to match the combined Egyptian army and their deadly horse archers in an open battle.

Thus, in a commendable display of cunning, Nicefuru paid for Tyre’s ships to sail his army towards the Nile Delta. By 1195, the Egyptians had already resupplied their armies and made another attempt to capture the Holy City, but this left their territories unprotected from the Normans, who landed on the Nile Delta with little opposition. They requisitioned food and supplies from nearby towns and villages, never laying a finger on the grateful populace. Those towns and villages that resisted, on the other hand, were put to the torch.

20250104104334_1.jpg

With food, supplies, and plunder in tow, the Normans moved north up the coast and towards the Holy City, now under siege by the Egyptians once again. Rather than confront the numerically superior Egyptians as he did before, Nicefurru instead traversed with his army through the Judean Mountains, assisted by a local guide who knew of a goat track in his childhood. Using the same strategy used by the Saracens against the crusader armies in the past, Nicefuru divided his light cavalry into smaller bands of outriders. They harassed the Egyptians’ supply lines and communications, retreating back into the safety of the mountains.

Nicefuru would finally have his chance for a decisive battle on September 7, 1196. The Egyptians had split off a third of their army in order to track down the elusive Norman force, while the rest continued their siege of the Holy City. This was a fatal error on their part, for as they passed through the city of Hebron, the seven thousand-strong Norman army fell upon them, with Nicefuru and a contingent of armoured horsemen leading the charge. Blocked off from the main army, the Egyptians instead attempted to flee southward with the Normans hot on their heels. Despite a desperate rearguard action by the Egyptians in what would be known as the Slaughter of Baidha-Petra, Nicefuru eventually caught up with the fleeing army by April 1197. The Egyptian army, already pushed to the brink by exhaustion and starvation, broke and fled. The Normans were victorious, even claiming one of the enemy’s banners, which they proceeded to burn on a pyre as a celebration of their victory.

20250104111820_1.jpg
20250104113005_1.jpg

Nicefuru would receive more good news, for Queen Sibylla had sent missives to Alodia. Nothing much is known about this enigmatic kingdom located further down the Nile River, other than that they had adopted the Egyptian teachings of Christianity, distinct from those in Rome and Constantinople. But they were Christians nonetheless, which made them a valuable ally against the Mohammedans. Queen Sibylla, more pragmatic than pious, managed to sway the king with promises of a marriage pact between their king and her eldest daughter, and their children would adopt the Christian faith of Alodia. And so, six thousand warriors and horsemen thus sailed across the Red Sea, where they met with Nicefurru’s army.

Swelled to a force of over thirteen thousand men, the combined army marched towards Jerusalem where the Egyptians, finally aware of the fate that befell the host they had dispatched, abandoned their siege of the Holy City a second time to meet the oncoming threat bearing down on them. Both armies met on the 9th of June 1197 in the Negev Desert. The Egyptian forces attempted to strike the first blow, when the desert sun was shining in their enemy’s faces. They sent their horse archers to encircle their enemy, showering a hail of arrows upon them. But the Normans and Alodian infantry quickly formed a formidable defence, their heavy armour protecting them from the worst of the onslaught. The Alodians also had mounted archers of their own, and they responded with arrows of their own and with much greater success. What followed was a clash of infantry as Norman and Alodian swordsmen threw themselves at Saracen spears and sabres. Both sides fought valiantly and fiercely, until Nicefurru and a contingent of knights charged into the enemy’s centre. The Egyptians soon lost their heart for battle and fled.

20250104113404_1.jpg

The First Battle at Negev was the turning point of the war, for while the allied army lost a thousand men, they inflicted twice as many casualties upon the enemy. But more importantly, defeat had caused the Egyptian coalition to scatter. Together they had been the bane of the Normans, but piecemeal they were as harmless as lambs to the slaughter. Several more skirmishes followed with the Second Battle at Negev in November 1197 and the Second Battle of Ghazza the following month, which were so inconsequential that Nicefuru’s scribe only made a passing mention of them in his accounts, other than that they resulted in the Normans triumphant.

But the Sultan of the Delta had managed to rally his forces for a last-ditch offensive into the heartland of the Kingdom of Heaven. The invaders were soon intercepted by the Norman-Alodian army five miles from the Holy City. Had the Egyptians still possessed their deadly mounted cavalry, which had been annihilated in the First Battle at Negev, they might have had a chance of victory. But they did not.

20250104114746_1.jpg

20250104114746_1.jpg
Realising that the battle was lost, the Sultan of Delta finally sued for peace on February 1198, bringing an end to the war. The Normans had lost roughly three thousand men, but it was the treacherous desert heat, rather than Saracen spears and arrows, that did most of the killing. Nevertheless, they brought back home with them many treasures and prisoners of war. Many of these captives were scribes and freeriders, who soon found their services needed in William’s court. Their writings, alongside those of Nicefuru’s scribe, served as valuable firsthand accounts of the war in the Holy Land.

20250104115545_1.jpg

While the Norman army returned home to regroup and resupply, Queen Sibylla’s war with the Abassids had finally swung in her favour. Her armies had pushed back the Abassids out of Syria and into their own lands. By April 1199, William pledges support for Sibylla in her war and his army sets sail for the Holy Land once more.

20250106203930_1.jpg

Unfortunately, little is known about the Normans’ involvement in Syria. Not even Nicefuru’s scribe, whose accounts had provided much insight into the Palestinian front, wrote much about his experiences there. What can be agreed upon, however, was that the Abassids would sue for peace in late September of 1201.

20250106204915_1.jpg

What followed was a few years of peace. However, in 1202, the Kingdom of Sicily was soon struck by a plague appropriately named Beelzebub’s Fever. The first symptoms of the disease was a rash on the chest and back that would later spread to the arms and legs. The fever came afterwards, which leave the afflicted burning to the touch. While not as devastating as the Aetolian Pox that came two decades prior, many succumbed to its effects. Not even the royal family was safe from the contagion. Princesses Catherine and Edith were the first to fall ill, though none caused as much an uproar than the king himself, who found himself burning with fever. Only through the valiant efforts of his court physician Esther that the king managed to survive.

20250106210927_1.jpg

20250106210934_1.jpg

Perhaps out of desperation, William attempted to introduce leechings as suggested by his physicians and scholars. But their failure to stop the plague’s advance, not to mention the mounting deaths of his friends and courtiers, dealt a heavy blow to the king’s confidence and he soon reclused himself in his chambers, while his wife Joan took charge of the kingdom’s affairs.

By the time Beelzebub’s Fever had receded, the Kingdom of Sicily would find itself thrust into another war.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
the Ayubbids, led by a man named Salah al-Din who had overthrown the old Fatimid yoke and proclaimed himself Sultan of Egypt and Syria. But the Sultan’s reign would be short-lived, for he would die on April of 1179 of camp fever, an ignominuous end for a would-be conqueror. His lands were divvied up amongst families, who soon squabbled over who would inherit Salah al-Din’s empire.
That's good for Jerusalem... (and Sicily due to the alliance)