Sorry if there's already a general discussion thread for Granada, but I couldn't see any. I can think of two big topics for discussion:
What should we do about Granada's tech-group?
At the moment they would drop to Orthodox in 1427 and then get back to Latin with the Shepherd King, but these tech-group changes have been commented out. Should we put them back? Also, should we ever make Granada's tech-group suffer even if the Malwas don't take over, eg if they become very expansionist and narrow-minded?
Granada's expansion strategies
After finishing off the Iberians, Granada basically has three routes to expansion: northwards into France, southwards into Africa, or peaceful colonialism, and this is reflected in dynastic choices. The current setup is that the peaceful colonial route is default and easy, the African route is non-default, but still pretty easy, and the French route is extremely difficult and requires Granada to make huge sacrifices. I'm wondering about the relative rewards of these routes, especially given the new Gibraltar-Tangiers connection.
IMO, the difficulty of the French route is about right. However, the Yahwar peaceful route seems a bit weak, while the Moroccan route is now really easy, and with a land connection it gives quite substantial rewards when you consider that much of Africa is Arabic or Berber, even more is Sunni, and most of the rest is Pagan, so easily assimilated. The only danger is the West African Trade Bubble, but that will be avoided by any competent player, who can easily get Infra 7, Trade 6 by 1675.
What should we do about Granada's tech-group?
At the moment they would drop to Orthodox in 1427 and then get back to Latin with the Shepherd King, but these tech-group changes have been commented out. Should we put them back? Also, should we ever make Granada's tech-group suffer even if the Malwas don't take over, eg if they become very expansionist and narrow-minded?
Granada's expansion strategies
After finishing off the Iberians, Granada basically has three routes to expansion: northwards into France, southwards into Africa, or peaceful colonialism, and this is reflected in dynastic choices. The current setup is that the peaceful colonial route is default and easy, the African route is non-default, but still pretty easy, and the French route is extremely difficult and requires Granada to make huge sacrifices. I'm wondering about the relative rewards of these routes, especially given the new Gibraltar-Tangiers connection.
IMO, the difficulty of the French route is about right. However, the Yahwar peaceful route seems a bit weak, while the Moroccan route is now really easy, and with a land connection it gives quite substantial rewards when you consider that much of Africa is Arabic or Berber, even more is Sunni, and most of the rest is Pagan, so easily assimilated. The only danger is the West African Trade Bubble, but that will be avoided by any competent player, who can easily get Infra 7, Trade 6 by 1675.