Hard Reset Blues
While I adore the concept, I unfortunately am feeling let down by Hard Reset - the premise is amazing, but the execution and especially situation are really disappointing.
For example: I created an empire I intended to be something of a galactic interventionist. Egalitarian, Xenophile, Militarist, with Crusader Spirit and Idealistic Foundation. The idea being along the lines of "Cool, we've broken our shackles, now let's fight to make sure this doesn't happen to anyone else". Using the augments for good (yeah I know it's cliche). But no, the main Situation is divided between complete rejection or wholly embrace the machine - finding a middle-ground is only treated as a temporary stopgap rather than a serious option without a way to address your negative traits. Even worse is that the situation progresses entirely on the arbitrary value assigned to each ethic - again, really frustrating given most things in Stellaris are left intentionally vague. Why can't the militarists want to de-cyber and fight for the chance to do so, instead of being locked into wanting to terrorize the galaxy with authoritarian rule? Why are egalitarians locked into wanting to reject all augments so they don't look as scary when they could take advantage of their augments to improve the lives of all (who want them, at least)?
In short: The social direction really needs to be decoupled from empire ethics - it's an unnecessary restraint on roleplay. Additionally, I think there really ought to be a more proper "make our own way" kind of option, rather than the extremes of following the machine or returning to nature.
While I adore the concept, I unfortunately am feeling let down by Hard Reset - the premise is amazing, but the execution and especially situation are really disappointing.
For example: I created an empire I intended to be something of a galactic interventionist. Egalitarian, Xenophile, Militarist, with Crusader Spirit and Idealistic Foundation. The idea being along the lines of "Cool, we've broken our shackles, now let's fight to make sure this doesn't happen to anyone else". Using the augments for good (yeah I know it's cliche). But no, the main Situation is divided between complete rejection or wholly embrace the machine - finding a middle-ground is only treated as a temporary stopgap rather than a serious option without a way to address your negative traits. Even worse is that the situation progresses entirely on the arbitrary value assigned to each ethic - again, really frustrating given most things in Stellaris are left intentionally vague. Why can't the militarists want to de-cyber and fight for the chance to do so, instead of being locked into wanting to terrorize the galaxy with authoritarian rule? Why are egalitarians locked into wanting to reject all augments so they don't look as scary when they could take advantage of their augments to improve the lives of all (who want them, at least)?
In short: The social direction really needs to be decoupled from empire ethics - it's an unnecessary restraint on roleplay. Additionally, I think there really ought to be a more proper "make our own way" kind of option, rather than the extremes of following the machine or returning to nature.
- 11
- 4
- 1