There were many people between Louis the Younger of Italy and Otto the Great that called themselves emperor while just controlling north Italy.Can't wait for an HRE update that removes this absurdity that is the "Empire of Italia".
- 2
There were many people between Louis the Younger of Italy and Otto the Great that called themselves emperor while just controlling north Italy.Can't wait for an HRE update that removes this absurdity that is the "Empire of Italia".
Not while coexisting with the HRE. Because Italy is an integral part of the foundations of the HRE. It should not be something you can just leave and ignore. Once the HRE is formed, as opposed to just Germania, northern Italy should become part of its de jure.There were many people between Louis the Younger of Italy and Otto the Great that called themselves emperor while just controlling north Italy.
Italy had more autonomy than the rest of the empire because of the alps making it more difficult to govern effectively. After Fredrick Barbarossa was unsuccessful in asserting imperial authority by force, northern Italy became de facto independent. Plus, independence factions don't always just look at de jure setup. Low cultural acceptance can impact factions that attempt to break away.Not while coexisting with the HRE. Because Italy is an integral part of the foundations of the HRE. It should not be something you can just leave and ignore. Once the HRE is formed, as opposed to just Germania, northern Italy should become part of its de jure.
Idea: Germany or Italy could be more rebellious based on where your capital is. If you set up in Germany, Italy gets rebellious, and vice versa.Italy had more autonomy than the rest of the empire because of the alps making it more difficult to govern effectively. After Fredrick Barbarossa was unsuccessful in asserting imperial authority by force, northern Italy became de facto independent. Plus, independence factions don't always just look at de jure setup. Low cultural acceptance can impact factions that attempt to break away.
Not a bad suggestion.Idea: Germany or Italy could be more rebellious based on where your capital is. If you set up in Germany, Italy gets rebellious, and vice versa.
The geography update in a map painter game would be kicking over the entire hornets' nest ...Idea: Germany or Italy could be more rebellious based on where your capital is. If you set up in Germany, Italy gets rebellious, and vice versa.
It would be a bit more complex, but different levels of authority for different regions would represent the situation better.The geography update in a map painter game would be kicking over the entire hornets' nest ...
I remember that Medieval II Total War had a "distance from capital" modifier, where further-out provinces were more rebellious. Maybe something like that could be implemented here? It would certainly make it harder for players to blob the world.It would be a bit more complex, but different levels of authority for different regions would represent the situation better.
In Rome I Total War too! (They share quite a lot mechanically)I remember that Medieval II Total War had a "distance from capital" modifier, where further-out provinces were more rebellious. Maybe something like that could be implemented here? It would certainly make it harder for players to blob the world.
Technically, the Italian vassals will be more likely to form independence factions due to not being dejure. But in practice, that's easy to play around, and can even be beneficial in some situations (since it means disgruntled vassals will be spread into more factions, making each individual factions weaker).Idea: Germany or Italy could be more rebellious based on where your capital is. If you set up in Germany, Italy gets rebellious, and vice versa.