• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

MattyG

Attention is love.
15 Badges
Mar 23, 2003
3.690
1
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Deus Vult
  • Diplomacy
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
Please post comments here about the current distrubution of nations on the Interregnum 2 map.

Note that some comments have already been posted here.

The map can be downloaded from http://www.mediafire.com/?f0znx1nyzmx


Note again that India and China and parts of SE Asia have not been divided. Waiting on Siafu and feedback on Garbeons proposal for India.
 
Garbon said:
Hi,

What's the difference between your Purépecha state and you're Tarascan state? Aren't they the same thing?


Yes.

My bad.

See orimazd's posting in the thread he was not supposed to post his comments in ... such a naughty boy.
 
Garbon said:
I can confirm that this was indeed the intention.


Awesome!

Got a province.csv for me yet ... :eek:

Love your map.
 
MattyG said:
Yes.

My bad.

See orimazd's posting in the thread he was not supposed to post his comments in ... such a naughty boy.
Is your wife going to punish me? Please say yes!

/post is reserved for about an hour later when i have time to post my cacoal place stuff

/now is good

But first:

Yes. oops. And the name of the state was Michhuàquê. I will update the game accordingly.
Yes, let us call them "Those who have fish!"

Would be pretty funny actually.

You have missed the arrow I have on the map indicating that I put the Cholula in the wrong province, that they ought to have been in the province named Cholula. Paint is an unforgiving program where nothing can be removed or undone.
I see it now. Was kinda faint but the whole map was pretty new to me.

So, the Azteca to Mexico province, yes???
Si senor! What happened to putting the Mayans in north west south america? ame rationale as with not getting all of Haiti?

I know that when I play as the Maya...or when I did, anyways, I was big on colonizing the antilles and then everywhere else in sight that wasn't colonized already. Will they be able to see the islands, florida, and north west south america at least?

Moving on to Cacoal, I can't make them look rounded out without making them big, but my original intention basically was to give them Amapa, Marajo, Tembe, and Jacunda. However, I don't know where the gold province Mato Grosso got moved to in this map, which complicates things.

And considering how much people of this day actually got around, they should know the sea lanes leading up to the Mayan capital, and maybe their cuban provinces as well. Thor Heyerdahl showed that people in little boats got a lot further around than we originally thought, and there is plenty of pottery evidence of Jomon (ancient Japanese) contact with Ecuador or Bolivia or something like that, from thousands of years ago. There are also some awesome boats in Egypt which were build to sail oceans, buried at the Osirion I think, from not so many thousands of years ago, so yeah. People got around more than we originally thought they did, so we should show that kinda.

I also suggest giving Cacoal knowledge of the entire Amazon river provinces, though definitely not controlling them. Perhaps having trading posts in Coropa, Munduruku, and Apanta, though, with fortresses because the natives will probably revolt at the drop of a hat if they are set up anything like in Vanilla.
/reads Graham Hancock, but ignores the batshit insane ideas
 
Last edited:
Just d/led the .rar'ed map, and I have to say that I'm impressed :)

However, there's one thing that's bothering me a little--in Interregnum 1, the Baleares were owned by Tlemscen, while on this map, they seem to have changed hands and become part of Al-Andalus. What was your reasoning on this change?
 
Specialist290 said:
Just d/led the .rar'ed map, and I have to say that I'm impressed :)

However, there's one thing that's bothering me a little--in Interregnum 1, the Baleares were owned by Tlemscen, while on this map, they seem to have changed hands and become part of Al-Andalus. What was your reasoning on this change?

It was a change that Calipah requested. he didn't really say why, but that region is kinda his 'baby' and I largely defer to him.

Personally, I liked it as part of Tlescen too.
 
It's culturally more Andalusi than North African, and it makes perfect sense that the Nasrids would reclaim it as part of the Cordovan heritage.
 
Calipah said:
It's culturally more Andalusi than North African, and it makes perfect sense that the Nasrids would reclaim it as part of the Cordovan heritage.


Yes, but ....

That doesn't mean that own it at game start.

It can have andalusi culture but be currently part of Tlemscen. Gives something for Al-Andalus to aim for!!!
 
Makes it easier for Tlemscen to have something to aim for--they can become the Mujadids, irght? Genoa and/or Sicily would be more interested in picking a fight, and a well-played Tlemscen will find themselves turning bright english red in such a situation, at the right time.