• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

CaptainDelap

Corporal
44 Badges
Apr 15, 2018
25
0
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Victoria 2
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Magicka 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Divine Wind
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • For the Motherland
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
In Ireland, the dev team have got some things wrong, specifically in the kingdoms around the pale. Most of these owed allegiance to the English crown. Either they should be made vassals, marches, or some other similar status. Kildare should also be basically unchallenged in dominance over this region, especially in comparison to Ormond.
Anyone else see any more inaccuracies in Ireland? I hope the devs will fix these! :D
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
In Ireland, the dev team have got some things wrong, specifically in the kingdoms around the pale. Most of these owed allegiance to the English crown. Either they should be made vassals, marches, or some other similar status. Kildare should also be basically unchallenged in dominance over this region, especially in comparison to Ormond.
Anyone else see any more inaccuracies in Ireland.? I hope the devs will fix these! :D
Do you really want to try unify Ireland while either trapped as a march (and having to fight England to be free first) or with half your necessary lands under England (and again, requiring fighting England for the sake of a couple of tiny provinces)?

Additionally, they nominally owed allegiance but it was hardly enforced and none of them actually paid any lip service to England. Eu4 lacks a system for "Acknowledges you kicked their face in the past but wouldn't so much as move to hand you water while you're dying of thirst" so independence is fine.

Lastly, Kildare only became the undisputed power by the end of the 15th century. Game starts mid-15th century.
 
Do you really want to try unify Ireland while either trapped as a march (and having to fight England to be free first) or with half your necessary lands under England (and again, requiring fighting England for the sake of a couple of tiny provinces)?

Additionally, they nominally owed allegiance but it was hardly enforced and none of them actually paid any lip service to England. Eu4 lacks a system for "Acknowledges you kicked their face in the past but wouldn't so much as move to hand you water while you're dying of thirst" so independence is fine.

Lastly, Kildare only became the undisputed power by the end of the 15th century. Game starts mid-15th century.
Some kind of semi-march status would be nice. It wouldn't be ALL the Irish minors. Just Kildare, Ormond and maybe some others.
 
Last edited:
Some kind of semi-march status would be nice.
Best that EU4 can offer is tributary and that would require events to keep Ireland and England acting somewhat normal rather than just Ireland paying England 1 gold every year to bugger off.
 
The earldoms were nominally fiefs, in a similar way to how Burgundy, Brittany and Provence were. With current EUIV mechanics it is considerably more accurate to depict them as independent, even if it misses certain nuances such as the Earl of Kildare being the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.
 
The earldoms were nominally fiefs, in a similar way to how Burgundy, Brittany and Provence were. With current EUIV mechanics it is considerably more accurate to depict them as independent, even if it misses certain nuances such as the Earl of Kildare being the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.
It would be more acurate if they were tributary
 
Do you really want to try unify Ireland while either trapped as a march (and having to fight England to be free first) or with half your necessary lands under England (and again, requiring fighting England for the sake of a couple of tiny provinces)?

Additionally, they nominally owed allegiance but it was hardly enforced and none of them actually paid any lip service to England. Eu4 lacks a system for "Acknowledges you kicked their face in the past but wouldn't so much as move to hand you water while you're dying of thirst" so independence is fine.

Lastly, Kildare only became the undisputed power by the end of the 15th century. Game starts mid-15th century.

This is essentially why Ireland is the way it is in EU4. Even a tributary relationship would be excessively formal to represent English "rule" over Ireland in 1444.