running at full speed, it is ridiculously slower than the regular doomsday.
i'm running core 0.25 and dd 1.2.
i'm running core 0.25 and dd 1.2.
The AI tries to send either naval units or convoys to a non-existing port, and keeps retrying it apparently. As CORE has more naval units than DD it affects CORE rather badly. I really have no clue why DD itself doesn't appear to be suffering from it - it's a Vanilla bug after all.GeneralHannibal said:How does such a small thing make a difference?
That's good to hear.kel varnsen said:ok, was a lot better when i started a new game. guess it works then...
Hagar said:The AI tries to send either naval units or convoys to a non-existing port, and keeps retrying it apparently. As CORE has more naval units than DD it affects CORE rather badly. I really have no clue why DD itself doesn't appear to be suffering from it - it's a Vanilla bug after all.
After applying the fix CORE was about 25% slower than regular DD IIRC.
DD itself isn't too stable, so that might be causing it. I do suspect a memory leak is the problem, probably goes for all Paradox games really. Just set your autosave to montly, and you won't suffer too much from it.Nomble said:Still getting lots of crash to desktop with CORE. It's a real shame![]()
Hagar said:DD itself isn't too stable, so that might be causing it. I do suspect a memory leak is the problem, probably goes for all Paradox games really. Just set your autosave to montly, and you won't suffer too much from it.
What's your internal memory like?
DarkSoul1984 said:Ran through a log I created for it.....
The problem is with the US convoys in my game.
Naval units automatically went to Pearl, but as soon as they put a unit on Hawaii, oh dear lord. The convoys referenced it a lot.
One quick fix I could think of would be to change the error threshold, so if it doesn't work on the first try, give up, but that requires messing with the .exe most likely, which I'm not about to do.
The situation might vary depending on the current game, so I am gonna test it out some more.
dec152000 said:Hi,
Obviouslly you know more about technical programing than I do. Could you be a bit more specific about what exactly you saw during your checks that was causing the problems. I do write code for CORE but it's just a self taught hobby so when you start getting into the workings of the code I need very specific explanations.
mm