Hey Everyone,
Just putting this out there to see others opinions and reasonings. What direction you think CK3 is going in compared to its predecessor CK2 and in comparison with other Grand Strategy games in PDX's lineup.
In my opinion the Role-Playing element has taken the stage over CK2 which I can't say has made CK3 worse as a result just "different", in a way were it seems now it's lacking in other areas because of it.
Maybe an elephant in the room was CK3 was determined to be an easier gateway game for more casual minded players to slowly transition them to other more complex titles in the catalog? Would it have been better to just make a newer title if that was the case?
Or maybe not.
Maybe things will get fleshed out more in due time.
Is the Grand Strategy Genre changing as a whole?
Thank you for my Ted talk.
Just putting this out there to see others opinions and reasonings. What direction you think CK3 is going in compared to its predecessor CK2 and in comparison with other Grand Strategy games in PDX's lineup.
In my opinion the Role-Playing element has taken the stage over CK2 which I can't say has made CK3 worse as a result just "different", in a way were it seems now it's lacking in other areas because of it.
Maybe an elephant in the room was CK3 was determined to be an easier gateway game for more casual minded players to slowly transition them to other more complex titles in the catalog? Would it have been better to just make a newer title if that was the case?
Or maybe not.
Maybe things will get fleshed out more in due time.
Is the Grand Strategy Genre changing as a whole?
Thank you for my Ted talk.
Last edited:
- 1
- 1